Blueprint of a smokescreen: Introducing the validated climate disinformation corpus for behavioural research on combating climate disinformation

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Blueprint of a smokescreen: Introducing the validated climate disinformation corpus for behavioural research on combating climate disinformation. / Spampatti, Tobia; Brosch, Tobias; Mumenthaler, Christian et al.
in: British Journal of Psychology, 2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f6eb2b69873642a990ec12cff7875e6e,
title = "Blueprint of a smokescreen: Introducing the validated climate disinformation corpus for behavioural research on combating climate disinformation",
abstract = "Behavioural science research has the potential to develop evidence-based strategies to fight disinformation about climate science and climate mitigation action; however, this research has yet to be conducted systematically with validated sets of climate disinformation stimuli. Here, we present the Climate Disinformation Corpus, a collection of climate disinformation statements designed to systematize experimental research testing future disinformation interventions. Using computational social science techniques, we gathered climate disinformation stimuli from the social media platform Twitter/X. We identified 78 statements containing disinformation about the existence, the causes, the consequences of climate change, the reliability and objectivity of climate scientists, and arguing for the delay of climate policies. The Climate Disinformation Corpus showed good heterogeneity across 15 validation measures (e.g., perceived persuasiveness, perceived trustworthiness, and sharing intentions) in a validation study involving a representative sample of N = 503 British participants. Furthermore, the climate disinformation statements were correlated with four individual differences measures related to belief in climate science and support for climate actions, congruently with theoretical expectations. We conclude with practical suggestions on implementing the Climate Disinformation Corpus in disinformation research according to different research questions.",
keywords = "climate disinformation, misinformation, social media, Psychology",
author = "Tobia Spampatti and Tobias Brosch and Christian Mumenthaler and Hahnel, {Ulf J.J.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s). British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society.",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1111/bjop.70012",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blueprint of a smokescreen

T2 - Introducing the validated climate disinformation corpus for behavioural research on combating climate disinformation

AU - Spampatti, Tobia

AU - Brosch, Tobias

AU - Mumenthaler, Christian

AU - Hahnel, Ulf J.J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society.

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Behavioural science research has the potential to develop evidence-based strategies to fight disinformation about climate science and climate mitigation action; however, this research has yet to be conducted systematically with validated sets of climate disinformation stimuli. Here, we present the Climate Disinformation Corpus, a collection of climate disinformation statements designed to systematize experimental research testing future disinformation interventions. Using computational social science techniques, we gathered climate disinformation stimuli from the social media platform Twitter/X. We identified 78 statements containing disinformation about the existence, the causes, the consequences of climate change, the reliability and objectivity of climate scientists, and arguing for the delay of climate policies. The Climate Disinformation Corpus showed good heterogeneity across 15 validation measures (e.g., perceived persuasiveness, perceived trustworthiness, and sharing intentions) in a validation study involving a representative sample of N = 503 British participants. Furthermore, the climate disinformation statements were correlated with four individual differences measures related to belief in climate science and support for climate actions, congruently with theoretical expectations. We conclude with practical suggestions on implementing the Climate Disinformation Corpus in disinformation research according to different research questions.

AB - Behavioural science research has the potential to develop evidence-based strategies to fight disinformation about climate science and climate mitigation action; however, this research has yet to be conducted systematically with validated sets of climate disinformation stimuli. Here, we present the Climate Disinformation Corpus, a collection of climate disinformation statements designed to systematize experimental research testing future disinformation interventions. Using computational social science techniques, we gathered climate disinformation stimuli from the social media platform Twitter/X. We identified 78 statements containing disinformation about the existence, the causes, the consequences of climate change, the reliability and objectivity of climate scientists, and arguing for the delay of climate policies. The Climate Disinformation Corpus showed good heterogeneity across 15 validation measures (e.g., perceived persuasiveness, perceived trustworthiness, and sharing intentions) in a validation study involving a representative sample of N = 503 British participants. Furthermore, the climate disinformation statements were correlated with four individual differences measures related to belief in climate science and support for climate actions, congruently with theoretical expectations. We conclude with practical suggestions on implementing the Climate Disinformation Corpus in disinformation research according to different research questions.

KW - climate disinformation

KW - misinformation

KW - social media

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105011065927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bjop.70012

DO - 10.1111/bjop.70012

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 40682248

AN - SCOPUS:105011065927

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship
  2. The power of philology between sacralisation and poetic and aesthetic semi-secularisation
  3. A high power dye laser pumped by a crowbar mode flashlamp
  4. Mechanisms of short-term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands
  5. Requests in Informal Conversations
  6. Supportive Mental Health Self-Monitoring among Smartphone Users with Psychological Distress
  7. Tree species richness strengthens relationships between ants and the functional composition of spider assemblages in a highly diverse forest
  8. WhatsApp und das prozessuale Interface
  9. Broadening the scope of ecosystem services research
  10. Positive Adolescent Career Development
  11. Process parameter assessment on the dissimilar deposition of AA2024-T351 on AA7475-T761 by friction surfacing
  12. Energy management for inductive power transmission
  13. Recycling-oriented fabrication of soft robots
  14. Special issue on Responsible Management Learning:
  15. Pricing effects when competitors arrive
  16. Every single word
  17. Can learning to move foster sustainable development? A systematic literature review examining the potential of sport and physical activity in the context of environmental and sustainability education
  18. Variation in gaze following across the life span
  19. Existential Graphs as Ontographic Media
  20. Empathy and Donation Behavior Toward Happy and Sad Chimpanzees
  21. Rationality and Sin
  22. The relational sociology of eco-innovation
  23. BETWEEN SPECIFITY AND CONTEXT. SOCIAL ART HISTORY REVISITED
  24. States and traits