Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: People and Nature, Jahrgang 2, Nr. 3, 09.2020, S. 643-659.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Biocultural approaches to sustainability
T2 - A systematic review of the scientific literature
AU - Hanspach, Jan
AU - Jamila Haider, Lisbeth
AU - Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
AU - Stahl Olafsson, Anton
AU - Gulsrud, Natalie M.
AU - Raymond, Christopher M.
AU - Torralba, Mario
AU - Martín-López, Berta
AU - Bieling, Claudia
AU - García-Martín, María
AU - Albert, Christian
AU - Beery, Thomas H.
AU - Fagerholm, Nora
AU - Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel
AU - Drews-Shambroom, Annika
AU - Plieninger, Tobias
N1 - J.H., I.D.‐R. and A.D.‐S. were funded through a social–ecological junior research group grant by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF; 01UU1903). E.O.‐R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (IJCI‐2017‐34334).
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Current sustainability challenges demand approaches that acknowledge a plurality of human–nature interactions and worldviews, for which biocultural approaches are considered appropriate and timely. This systematic review analyses the application of biocultural approaches to sustainability in scientific journal articles published between 1990 and 2018 through a mixed methods approach combining qualitative content analysis and quantitative multivariate methods. The study identifies seven distinct biocultural lenses, that is, different ways of understanding and applying biocultural approaches, which to different degrees consider the key aspects of sustainability science—inter- and transdisciplinarity, social justice and normativity. The review suggests that biocultural approaches in sustainability science need to move from describing how nature and culture are co-produced to co-producing knowledge for sustainability solutions, and in so doing, better account for questions of power, gender and transformations, which has been largely neglected thus far. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
AB - Current sustainability challenges demand approaches that acknowledge a plurality of human–nature interactions and worldviews, for which biocultural approaches are considered appropriate and timely. This systematic review analyses the application of biocultural approaches to sustainability in scientific journal articles published between 1990 and 2018 through a mixed methods approach combining qualitative content analysis and quantitative multivariate methods. The study identifies seven distinct biocultural lenses, that is, different ways of understanding and applying biocultural approaches, which to different degrees consider the key aspects of sustainability science—inter- and transdisciplinarity, social justice and normativity. The review suggests that biocultural approaches in sustainability science need to move from describing how nature and culture are co-produced to co-producing knowledge for sustainability solutions, and in so doing, better account for questions of power, gender and transformations, which has been largely neglected thus far. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
KW - bio-cultural
KW - conservation
KW - knowledge
KW - social–ecological systems
KW - Sustainable Development Goals
KW - transformation
KW - values
KW - Ecosystems Research
KW - Biology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091232439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/bb2754a4-bf07-3f1a-9a72-3eddaf130489/
U2 - 10.1002/pan3.10120
DO - 10.1002/pan3.10120
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:85091232439
VL - 2
SP - 643
EP - 659
JO - People and Nature
JF - People and Nature
SN - 2575-8314
IS - 3
ER -