Assessing inherent vulnerability of farming communities across different biogeographical zones in Himachal Pradesh, India

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

Vulnerability assessment is an important step in developing adaptation strategies. For biogeographically vital and extremely heterogeneous regions like Himalaya, assessing vulnerability as an inherent characteristic becomes crucial. The present study assesses the inherent vulnerability (IV) for farming communities of Himachal Pradesh as a function of sensitivity and adaptive capacity using social and ecological indicators, group-decision methods, and Geographical Information System (GIS) tools. Data for 13,877 villages in three different biogeographical zones (Lower Himalaya (LH), Middle Himalaya (MH), Trans-Himalaya Tibetan Plateau (THTP)) was collected from secondary sources. Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) was applied to weigh the social and ecological indicators. Weighted indicators were finally aggregated to generate the final inherent vulnerability index (IVI). The IVI values for different biogeographical zones (LH 0.35 ± 0.13, MH 0.42 ± 0.14 and THTP 0.30 ± 0.17) reveal that geographical location of zones played a decisive role in distribution of IV. MH showed the highest vulnerability due to fragile inherent biophysical and socio-economic conditions. The findings of this study will aid in better resource management for farming communities to enhance the agriculture capabilities of vulnerable zones. The findings of this study also have inference for developing adaptation strategies for present stressors in the region.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer100506
ZeitschriftEnvironmental Development
Jahrgang33
Anzahl der Seiten17
ISSN2211-4645
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 01.03.2020
Extern publiziertJa

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Kai Neubauer

Publikationen

  1. Künstlerische Repräsentationen des Holocaust in Wien und Berlin
  2. The ironies of autonomy
  3. Predicting individual plant performance in grasslands
  4. Remote? Präsenz? Hybrid? Blended?
  5. Solarpflicht durch Bundesgesetz
  6. Förderkartei 3./4. Schuljahr
  7. Lebhafte Artefakte
  8. Social Contexts in Team Formation:
  9. Post-dispersal seed predation of three grassland species in a plant diversity experiment
  10. Reformulation and common grounds
  11. Grenzen von „Serious Games for Health“
  12. A poor international standard for trap selectivity threatens carnivore conservation
  13. Akteur – Individuum – Subjekt
  14. The legal framework and an overview of electoral legislation
  15. Management in neuem Licht
  16. Einsatzfelder betrieblicher Umweltinformationssysteme anhand des EMA Frameworks
  17. Repayment of Cross-Border Shareholder Loans
  18. Stil als Zeichen
  19. 1. Einleitung
  20. § 19
  21. Formen des Kontakts
  22. Adaptation of the Brine Shrimp Artemia Salina (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) to Filter-Feeding
  23. Kommentierung von Art. 16a Grundgesetz: Asylrecht
  24. Real-Time-Advertising
  25. Optimierter Fahrereinsatz: Einsatzplanung im ÖPV mit Operations-Research-Methoden
  26. Zur Auseinandersetzung mit der Gender-Perspektivität
  27. Förderung des Wohlbefindens durch „Gamification“
  28. Photochemical reactions of brominated diphenylethers in organic sovents and adsorbed on silicon dioxide in aqueous suspension
  29. Extrusion benchmark 2009 experimental analysis of deflection in extrusion dies
  30. Strangpressen von Profilen mit variabler Wandstärke
  31. Sustainability Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
  32. Fusionsprotein und dessen Verwendungen
  33. Sattelfest beim Sattelfest?
  34. Exports, Imports and Profitability
  35. The proposed adjustment of Germany's renewable energy law
  36. Ökologisierung von Finanzmärkten
  37. Erleben, Verstehen, Vergleichen
  38. Anmerkungen zur naturrechtlichen Begründung geistigen Eigentums
  39. Geschichten der Disco
  40. Öffentliche Nachhaltigkeitssteuerung
  41. “Dann verfügen wir über Instrumente…”: Äußerungsbefugnisse von Mitgliedern der EU-Kommission
  42. Diverging perceptions by social groups on cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green