Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: a post-Ostrom research agenda
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Jahrgang 44, 01.06.2020, S. 26-34.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing understanding of natural resource governance
T2 - a post-Ostrom research agenda
AU - Cumming, Graeme S.
AU - Epstein, Graham
AU - Anderies, John Marty
AU - Apetrei, Cristina-Ioana
AU - Baggio, Jacopo Alessandro
AU - Bodin, Örjan
AU - Chawla, S.
AU - Clements, Hayley S.
AU - Cox, Michael E.
AU - Egli, Lukas
AU - Gurney, Georgina G.
AU - Lubell, Mark N.
AU - Magliocca, Nicholas R.
AU - Morrison, Tiffany H.
AU - Müller, Birgit
AU - Seppelt, Ralf
AU - Schlüter, Maja
AU - Unnikrishnan, Hita
AU - Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
AU - Weible, Christopher M.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Institutions are vital to the sustainability of social-ecological systems, balancing individual and group interests and coordinating responses to change. Ecological decline and social conflict in many places, however, indicate that our understanding and fostering of effective institutions for natural resource management is still lacking. We assess theoretical and methodological challenges facing positivist institutional analysis, focusing on natural resource governance according to Ostrom's social-ecological systems (SES) framework. Rather than adding more variables, progress requires a clearer, more consistent approach to selecting, defining and measuring institutional elements; stronger links between theory and empirical research; a greater focus on mechanisms and causality; and the development and application of new methods, including quantitative approaches. Strengthening the connections between theory, models, and data suggests several promising avenues for advancing institutional analysis through the study of relationships between institutional structure, process, function, context, and outcomes.
AB - Institutions are vital to the sustainability of social-ecological systems, balancing individual and group interests and coordinating responses to change. Ecological decline and social conflict in many places, however, indicate that our understanding and fostering of effective institutions for natural resource management is still lacking. We assess theoretical and methodological challenges facing positivist institutional analysis, focusing on natural resource governance according to Ostrom's social-ecological systems (SES) framework. Rather than adding more variables, progress requires a clearer, more consistent approach to selecting, defining and measuring institutional elements; stronger links between theory and empirical research; a greater focus on mechanisms and causality; and the development and application of new methods, including quantitative approaches. Strengthening the connections between theory, models, and data suggests several promising avenues for advancing institutional analysis through the study of relationships between institutional structure, process, function, context, and outcomes.
KW - Sustainability Governance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084076083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/cdce2a64-4a65-32e1-ba20-0bf71e733f74/
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:85084076083
VL - 44
SP - 26
EP - 34
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
SN - 1877-3435
ER -