A comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services: Integrating supply, demand and interest in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

A comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services: Integrating supply, demand and interest in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve. / Castillo-Eguskitza, Nekane; Martín-López, Berta; Onaindia, Miren.
in: Ecological Indicators, Jahrgang 93, 10.2018, S. 1176-1189.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{84e2f098b675470fb2deca6bf33dfd0b,
title = "A comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services: Integrating supply, demand and interest in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve",
abstract = "Integrated assessment of ecosystem services involves the recognition of value pluralism and the inclusion of the different components of ecosystem services, ranging from supply to social demand and interest. Supply refers to the capacity of ecosystems to provide services, while demand refers to the allocation of money or willingness to obtain a particular service and interest to the importance assigned to services. Yet, a comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services which integrates these three components is still unexplored. This paper proposes a methodological approach to examine (mis)matches, i.e. differences or similarities in quality or quantity, when analysing the supply, demand and interest components of ecosystem services. We assessed twelve ecosystem services in four different units socioeconomically and environmentally similar of the social-ecological system of the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve in Northern Spain. Results showed that the different ecosystem services components provide divergent but complementary information regarding their value. We also found that the information obtained is consistent across different spatial units with similar socio-economic characteristics, suggesting that the mismatch patterns among ecosystem services components are more related to the set of ecosystem services assessed than the socio-economic characteristics and land uses of the area of study. Our findings strengthen arguments of former calls for integration of the biophysical, monetary and socio-cultural values addressed by the supply, demand and interest components of ecosystem services.",
keywords = "Integrated assessment, Operationalization, Mismatches, Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve, Ecosystems Research, Biology, Sustainability Science",
author = "Nekane Castillo-Eguskitza and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Miren Onaindia",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.004",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "1176--1189",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services

T2 - Integrating supply, demand and interest in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve

AU - Castillo-Eguskitza, Nekane

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Onaindia, Miren

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Integrated assessment of ecosystem services involves the recognition of value pluralism and the inclusion of the different components of ecosystem services, ranging from supply to social demand and interest. Supply refers to the capacity of ecosystems to provide services, while demand refers to the allocation of money or willingness to obtain a particular service and interest to the importance assigned to services. Yet, a comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services which integrates these three components is still unexplored. This paper proposes a methodological approach to examine (mis)matches, i.e. differences or similarities in quality or quantity, when analysing the supply, demand and interest components of ecosystem services. We assessed twelve ecosystem services in four different units socioeconomically and environmentally similar of the social-ecological system of the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve in Northern Spain. Results showed that the different ecosystem services components provide divergent but complementary information regarding their value. We also found that the information obtained is consistent across different spatial units with similar socio-economic characteristics, suggesting that the mismatch patterns among ecosystem services components are more related to the set of ecosystem services assessed than the socio-economic characteristics and land uses of the area of study. Our findings strengthen arguments of former calls for integration of the biophysical, monetary and socio-cultural values addressed by the supply, demand and interest components of ecosystem services.

AB - Integrated assessment of ecosystem services involves the recognition of value pluralism and the inclusion of the different components of ecosystem services, ranging from supply to social demand and interest. Supply refers to the capacity of ecosystems to provide services, while demand refers to the allocation of money or willingness to obtain a particular service and interest to the importance assigned to services. Yet, a comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services which integrates these three components is still unexplored. This paper proposes a methodological approach to examine (mis)matches, i.e. differences or similarities in quality or quantity, when analysing the supply, demand and interest components of ecosystem services. We assessed twelve ecosystem services in four different units socioeconomically and environmentally similar of the social-ecological system of the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve in Northern Spain. Results showed that the different ecosystem services components provide divergent but complementary information regarding their value. We also found that the information obtained is consistent across different spatial units with similar socio-economic characteristics, suggesting that the mismatch patterns among ecosystem services components are more related to the set of ecosystem services assessed than the socio-economic characteristics and land uses of the area of study. Our findings strengthen arguments of former calls for integration of the biophysical, monetary and socio-cultural values addressed by the supply, demand and interest components of ecosystem services.

KW - Integrated assessment

KW - Operationalization

KW - Mismatches

KW - Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Biology

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048397920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/71e3b3a6-79d6-360f-baae-6f97246f3fb4/

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.004

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 93

SP - 1176

EP - 1189

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -

DOI