Understanding Communal Orientation in Men

Projekt: Forschung

Projektbeteiligte

  • Block, Katharina (Koordinator*in)
  • Martiny, Sarah E. (Partner*in)
  • Meeussen, Loes (Partner*in)
  • Olsson, Maria (Partner*in)
  • Schmader, Toni (Partner*in)
  • Schuster, Carolin (Partner*in)
  • Van Grootel, Sanne (Partner*in)
  • Van Laar, Colette (Partner*in)
  • Die Arktische Universität von Norwegen

Beschreibung

“We’ve begun to raise daughters more like sons, but few have the courage to raise our sons more like our daughters.”
― Gloria Steinem, Iconic Feminist

Social scientists in many countries have been concerned about gender equality for decades. In many developed nations, research and educational programs now seek to remedy women’s underrepresentation in science, technology, and leadership positions. But gender equality is not only a women’s issue. Men’s roles are also constrained by the norms, beliefs, values, and institutions of their societies. Many countries are now starting to recognize that gender inequality in healthcare, early education, and domestic roles (referred to as HEED roles) is an important issue. For example, in 2010, the European Commission stated that “Gender equality needs the active contribution, support and participation of men and policies should also address gender-related inequalities that affect boys/men”.

As social scientists, we believe that men’s relatively lower involvement in care-oriented roles is best understood in the context of cultural norms, values, and beliefs that can vary across nations.

We are recruiting social scientists in a unique cross-national collaboration. Our goal is to sample young men and women from a large number of countries to better understand the social-psychological factors that predict men’s interest in taking on care-oriented roles and occupations.
AkronymUCOM
StatusAbgeschlossen
Zeitraum01.11.1731.12.18

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. The Low-Code Phenomenon: Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Research
  2. Understanding Partnering Strategies in the Low-Code Platform Ecosystem
  3. Duration of Organizational Decision Processes in Organizations in View of Simulation Calculations
  4. Challenges and boundaries in implementing social return on investment
  5. Tree diversity and mycorrhizal type co-determine multitrophic ecosystem functions
  6. Is sensitivity for the complexity of mathematics teaching measurable?
  7. Wozu in Tönen denken?
  8. Formative Perspectives on the Relation Between CSR Communication and CSR Practices
  9. PID Controller Application in a Gimbal Construction for Camera Stabilization and Tracking
  10. Embarrassment as a public vs. private emotion and symbolic coping behaviour
  11. Comparing Empirical Methodologies in Pragmatics
  12. Are Acute Effects of Foam-Rolling Attributed to Dynamic Warm Up Effects? A Comparative Study
  13. Construct- and criterion-related validity of the German Core Self-Evaluations Scale
  14. Neural correlates of the enactment effect in the brain
  15. Mapping Khulan habitats - a GIS based approach.
  16. "Die Arbeit funktioniert"
  17. Student Game Design for Language Learning
  18. Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes
  19. Determinants and Outcomes of Dual Distribution:
  20. Guest Editors' Introduction
  21. Vector Fields Autonomous Control for Assistive Mobile Robots
  22. How can problems be turned into something good? The role of entrepreneurial learning and error mastery orientation
  23. Comparison of Backpropagation and Kalman Filter-based Training for Neural Networks
  24. Creative spaces in computer science
  25. Introduction to the challenges and chances regarding the utilization of nitrogen-rich by-products and waste streams
  26. Learning in the "Third Space"
  27. Process Analysis of Grounding Activities in Net-Based Cooperative Learning
  28. Unraveling Privacy Concerns in Complex Data Ecosystems with Architectural Thinking
  29. Which nudges get support - A Quantitative Analysis of the Dimensions Transparency and Dual Process Theory
  30. Integrating inductive and deductive analysis to identify and characterize archetypical social-ecological systems and their changes