Which function describes the species-area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Juergen Dengler
Aim The aims of this study are to resolve terminological confusion around different types of species–area relationships (SARs) and their delimitation from species sampling relationships (SSRs), to provide a comprehensive overview of models and analytical methods for SARs, to evaluate these theoretically and empirically, and to suggest a more consistent approach for the treatment of species–area data.

Location Curonian Spit in north-west Russia and archipelagos world-wide.

Methods First, I review various typologies for SARs and SSRs as well as mathematical models, fitting procedures and goodness-of-fit measures applied to SARs. This results in a list of 23 function types, which are applicable both for untransformed (S) and for log-transformed (log S) species richness. Then, example data sets for nested plots in continuous vegetation (n = 14) and islands (n = 6) are fitted to a selection of 12 function types (linear, power, logarithmic, saturation, sigmoid) both for S and for log S. The suitability of these models is assessed with Akaike’s information criterion for S and log S, and with a newly proposed metric that addresses extrapolation capability.

Results SARs, which provide species numbers for different areas and have no upper asymptote, must be distinguished from SSRs, which approach the species richness of one single area asymptotically. Among SARs, nested plots in continuous ecosystems, non-nested plots in continuous ecosystems, and isolates can be distinguished. For the SARs of the empirical data sets, the normal and quadratic power functions as well as two of the sigmoid functions (Lomolino, cumulative beta-P) generally performed well. The normal power function (fitted for S) was particularly suitable for predicting richness values over ten-fold increases in area. Linear, logarithmic, convex saturation and logistic functions generally were inappropriate. However, the two sigmoid models produced unstable results with arbitrary parameter estimates, and the quadratic power function resulted in decreasing richness values for large areas.

Main conclusions Based on theoretical considerations and empirical results, I suggest that the power law should be used to describe and compare any type of SAR while at the same time testing whether the exponent z changes with spatial scale. In addition, one should be aware that power-law parameters are significantly influenced by methodology.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Biogeography
Volume36
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)728-744
Number of pages17
ISSN0305-0270
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2009

    Research areas

  • Curve fitting, goodness-of-fit, logarithmic function, macroecology, model selection, power function, saturation function, sigmoid function, species sampling relationship, species-area relationship
  • Biology

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. A mixed-method approach to post-retirement career planning
  2. Company reputation and its influence on consumer trust in response to ongoing CSR communication
  3. Forschungsethik in der Kindheitsforschung
  4. Einleitung
  5. THE SOVIET CRACKDOWN ON LITHUANIAN PARTISAN MOVEMENTS (1946–1956) – A GENOCIDE?
  6. Wasser und nachhaltige Chemie
  7. Reversing a tree regeneration crisis in an endangered ecoregion
  8. The Influence of Political Engagement on Artistic Reputation. Self-Evaluations of Artists.
  9. Qualitätssicherung in der Lehrerbildung
  10. The organizational a priori
  11. "There is no alternative"
  12. Biorefineries in Germany
  13. Empirische Methoden
  14. Innovation is not enough
  15. Perspective taking does not moderate the price precision effect, but indirectly affects counteroffers to asking prices
  16. Engaging with Three Predicaments of Transnational Migration Research in the Postcolonial Condition
  17. Ein gemeinsamer europäischer Referenzrahmen für Sprachen oder für Englisch?
  18. Thermodynamic models
  19. Steuerliche Gewinnermittlung bei Unternehmen
  20. Crop diversity effects on temporal agricultural production stability across European regions
  21. Article 30 Review Clause
  22. Vergleichen, messen, schätzen
  23. MOLGEN-CID
  24. Technikfolgenabschätzung - eine Einführung
  25. Art 156: Establishment of the Authority
  26. The Mission (Im)possible of Climate Action through Quixotic Institutional Work
  27. Role of Acinetobacter for Biodegradability of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds
  28. Publicum
  29. Loving the mess
  30. Habitat continuity matters
  31. Evolution and transformation of early modern cosmological knowledge