Variation in nectar quality across 34 grassland plant species

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Floral nectar is considered the most important floral reward for attracting pollinators. It contains large amounts of carbohydrates besides variable concentrations of amino acids and thus represents an important food source for many pollinators. Its nutrient content and composition can, however, strongly vary within and between plant species. The factors driving this variation in nectar quality are still largely unclear. We investigated factors underlying interspecific variation in macronutrient composition of floral nectar in 34 different grassland plant species. Specifically, we tested for correlations between the phylogenetic relatedness and morphology of plants and the carbohydrate (C) and total amino acid (AA) composition and C:AA ratios of nectar. We found that compositions of carbohydrates and (essential) amino acids as well as C:AA ratios in nectar varied significantly within and between plant species. They showed no clear phylogenetic signal. Moreover, variation in carbohydrate composition was related to family-specific structural characteristics and combinations of morphological traits. Plants with nectar-exposing flowers, bowl- or parabolic-shaped flowers, as often found in the Apiaceae and Asteraceae, had nectar with higher proportions of hexoses, indicating a selective pressure to decelerate evaporation by increasing nectar osmolality. Our study suggests that variation in nectar nutrient composition is, among others, affected by family-specific combinations of morphological traits. However, even within species, variation in nectar quality is high. As nectar quality can strongly affect visitation patterns of pollinators and thus pollination success, this intra- and interspecific variation requires more studies to fully elucidate the underlying causes and the consequences for pollinator behaviour.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPlant Biology
Volume24
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)134-144
Number of pages11
ISSN1435-8603
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2022

Bibliographical note

The German Science Foundation (DFG) funded the Jena Experiment (DFG-FOR 1451/2) and SDL (LE 2750/1-1). We thank all members of the Jena Experiment community, who helped in maintaining the experiment throughout many years. Especially, we would like to thank our coordinator Anne Ebeling, our technical assistant Gerlinde Kratzsch and the gardeners, particularly Ute Köber and Silke Hengelhaupt, who also helped with flower bagging. Further thanks go to Stephanie Schröder who helped with nectar sampling. M. Heil and three anonymous reviewers provided useful input on an earlier version of the manuscript. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge Angela Gronert for performing analyses with HPLC and Richard Bolek for his useful advice.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Plant Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of German Society for Plant Sciences, Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.

    Research areas

  • Flower morphology, flowering grassland plants, Jena Experiment, nectar macronutrients, phylogeny
  • Ecosystems Research

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Diana Pili-Moss

Publications

  1. Characterization of the deformation state of magnesium by electrical resistance
  2. Umgang mit Heterogenität im Mathematikunterricht
  3. Notting Hill Gate 6
  4. A Review of Empirical Studies Concerning the Relationship Between Environmental and Economic Performance
  5. Discursive Tropes of Aggression Against Queer-Sexuality in Nigerian Standup Comedy
  6. Strongly diverging population genetic patterns of three skipper species
  7. Editorial
  8. Gnade
  9. Effects of prescribed burning on plant available nutrients in dry heathland ecosystems
  10. The German Environmental Information Act under the microscope
  11. § 171
  12. Text und Technik
  13. Explaining Age and Gender Differences in Employment Rates: A Labor Supply Side Perspective
  14. "Wir wissen nicht, was wir tun sollen" - Expertisierte Raumaneignung und -konstruktion
  15. Leistungsbeurteilung
  16. Syntheses of retipolide E and ornatipolide, 14-membered biaryl-ether macrolactones from mushrooms
  17. Soil and plant nitrogen pools as related to plant diversity in an experimental grassland
  18. Religion als performative Praxis im Jugendalter
  19. Temporality
  20. How Does it Pay to Be Green?
  21. Evaluation der Implementation konzeptuell unterschiedlicher Maßnahmen zur Leseförderung in der Sekundarstufe I
  22. Management von Biodiversität in Schutzgebieten
  23. Betriebliches Umweltmanagement
  24. Renewable Energy - Opportunities for production and use of electrical power for farmers under conditions of the renewable energy act in germany
  25. Informationsfeld Zeitverwendung
  26. Nuda Veritas?
  27. Rausch als "ästhetischer Zustand"
  28. Why more West than East German firms export
  29. Inszenierungen – Present tense incarnate im Fremdsprachenunterricht
  30. Agrifood Tourism, Rural Resilience, and Recovery in a Postdisaster Context: Insights and Evidence From Kaikoura-hurunui, New Zealand
  31. Wie führen Schulleitungen?
  32. KDD - Kriminaldauerdienst
  33. Affekte, Urteile und die Teilnahmemotivation
  34. Assessing a financial incentive for reducing length of stay of psychiatric inpatients
  35. Illusion Fortschritt - Wissen und Vergessen in der Pädagogik
  36. Meanings of democracy
  37. Fluchtbewegung in Variationen
  38. „Sippschaft eines interimistischen Zeitalters“
  39. Kooperationspartner, Netzwerke, Stakeholder im Bereich der Elternarbeit
  40. Sustainable Development Funds