Unmasking entrepreneurial life satisfaction: a deeper look at self-reported well-being

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Unmasking entrepreneurial life satisfaction: a deeper look at self-reported well-being. / Weldert, Maximilian; Heinemann, Henrik; Gielnik, Michael M. et al.
In: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 2025.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{18c3645b90fa4796bfefab072b2ad5b1,
title = "Unmasking entrepreneurial life satisfaction: a deeper look at self-reported well-being",
abstract = "Purpose – Well-being is a crucial outcome of entrepreneurial engagement; however, previous studies might have overlooked the potential impact of impression management on self-reported life satisfaction, which seems particularly relevant for entrepreneurs given their need to present themselves as resilient and successful to attract investors, customers, and other stakeholders. To address this gap, we integrate alternative measures to validate entrepreneurs' self-reports of life satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a sample of 235 entrepreneurs, measured at two points, one of which involved a stimulated investor meeting and 257 non-entrepreneurs, measured at a single time point, we examine the extent to which impression management influences self-reported life satisfaction. We assess the validity of self-reported life satisfaction by comparing it with peer ratings and objective quality-of-life indicators. Findings – Our results show that self-reported life satisfaction was substantially influenced by impression management, although this effect was not exclusive to entrepreneurs. Furthermore, while self-reported life satisfaction among non-entrepreneurs was well predicted using objective quality-of-life indicators – such as frequent time with family and friends, health status and income satisfaction – this approach explained significantly less variance among entrepreneurs. Originality/value – Understanding how self-reported life satisfaction corresponds to the reality of entrepreneurs is crucial as both theoretical and practical implications rely on the measurement of this singular variable. Our findings highlight that either entrepreneurs exhibit a certain positivity bias in their self-reports or other quality-of-life indicators may be decisive for their life satisfaction than for non-entrepreneurs, so that researchers must integrate different perspectives to decipher the relationship between entrepreneurship and self-reported well-being.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurship, Impression management, Life satisfaction, Well-being, Management studies",
author = "Maximilian Weldert and Henrik Heinemann and Gielnik, {Michael M.} and Philipp Sch{\"a}pers",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 Emerald Publishing Limited",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1108/IJEBR-03-2025-0357",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research",
issn = "1355-2554",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unmasking entrepreneurial life satisfaction

T2 - a deeper look at self-reported well-being

AU - Weldert, Maximilian

AU - Heinemann, Henrik

AU - Gielnik, Michael M.

AU - Schäpers, Philipp

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 Emerald Publishing Limited

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Purpose – Well-being is a crucial outcome of entrepreneurial engagement; however, previous studies might have overlooked the potential impact of impression management on self-reported life satisfaction, which seems particularly relevant for entrepreneurs given their need to present themselves as resilient and successful to attract investors, customers, and other stakeholders. To address this gap, we integrate alternative measures to validate entrepreneurs' self-reports of life satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a sample of 235 entrepreneurs, measured at two points, one of which involved a stimulated investor meeting and 257 non-entrepreneurs, measured at a single time point, we examine the extent to which impression management influences self-reported life satisfaction. We assess the validity of self-reported life satisfaction by comparing it with peer ratings and objective quality-of-life indicators. Findings – Our results show that self-reported life satisfaction was substantially influenced by impression management, although this effect was not exclusive to entrepreneurs. Furthermore, while self-reported life satisfaction among non-entrepreneurs was well predicted using objective quality-of-life indicators – such as frequent time with family and friends, health status and income satisfaction – this approach explained significantly less variance among entrepreneurs. Originality/value – Understanding how self-reported life satisfaction corresponds to the reality of entrepreneurs is crucial as both theoretical and practical implications rely on the measurement of this singular variable. Our findings highlight that either entrepreneurs exhibit a certain positivity bias in their self-reports or other quality-of-life indicators may be decisive for their life satisfaction than for non-entrepreneurs, so that researchers must integrate different perspectives to decipher the relationship between entrepreneurship and self-reported well-being.

AB - Purpose – Well-being is a crucial outcome of entrepreneurial engagement; however, previous studies might have overlooked the potential impact of impression management on self-reported life satisfaction, which seems particularly relevant for entrepreneurs given their need to present themselves as resilient and successful to attract investors, customers, and other stakeholders. To address this gap, we integrate alternative measures to validate entrepreneurs' self-reports of life satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a sample of 235 entrepreneurs, measured at two points, one of which involved a stimulated investor meeting and 257 non-entrepreneurs, measured at a single time point, we examine the extent to which impression management influences self-reported life satisfaction. We assess the validity of self-reported life satisfaction by comparing it with peer ratings and objective quality-of-life indicators. Findings – Our results show that self-reported life satisfaction was substantially influenced by impression management, although this effect was not exclusive to entrepreneurs. Furthermore, while self-reported life satisfaction among non-entrepreneurs was well predicted using objective quality-of-life indicators – such as frequent time with family and friends, health status and income satisfaction – this approach explained significantly less variance among entrepreneurs. Originality/value – Understanding how self-reported life satisfaction corresponds to the reality of entrepreneurs is crucial as both theoretical and practical implications rely on the measurement of this singular variable. Our findings highlight that either entrepreneurs exhibit a certain positivity bias in their self-reports or other quality-of-life indicators may be decisive for their life satisfaction than for non-entrepreneurs, so that researchers must integrate different perspectives to decipher the relationship between entrepreneurship and self-reported well-being.

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Impression management

KW - Life satisfaction

KW - Well-being

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105024462273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJEBR-03-2025-0357

DO - 10.1108/IJEBR-03-2025-0357

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105024462273

JO - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research

JF - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research

SN - 1355-2554

ER -