Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Standard
In: Ambio, Vol. 50, No. 1, 01.2021, p. 74-84.
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education
AU - Walsh, Zack
AU - Böhme, Jessica
AU - Wamsler, Christine
N1 - Open access funding provided by Lund University. Thanks to Thomas Bruhn and Brooke Lavelle for providing feedback on drafts. In addition, we thank the three anonymous reviewers whose critical feedback helped improve and clarify this manuscript.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Relational thinking has recently gained increasing prominence across academic disciplines in an attempt to understand complex phenomena in terms of constitutive processes and relations. Interdisciplinary fields of study, such as science and technology studies (STS), the environmental humanities, and the posthumanities, for example, have started to reformulate academic understanding of nature-cultures based on relational thinking. Although the sustainability crisis serves as a contemporary backdrop and in fact calls for such innovative forms of interdisciplinary scholarship, the field of sustainability research has not yet tapped into the rich possibilities offered by relational thinking. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to identify relational approaches to ontology, epistemology, and ethics which are relevant to sustainability research. More specifically, we analyze how relational approaches have been understood and conceptualized across a broad range of disciplines and contexts relevant to sustainability to identify and harness connections and contributions for future sustainability-related work. Our results highlight common themes and patterns across relational approaches, helping to identify and characterize a relational paradigm within sustainability research. On this basis, we conclude with a call to action for sustainability researchers to co-develop a research agenda for advancing this relational paradigm within sustainability research, practice, and education.
AB - Relational thinking has recently gained increasing prominence across academic disciplines in an attempt to understand complex phenomena in terms of constitutive processes and relations. Interdisciplinary fields of study, such as science and technology studies (STS), the environmental humanities, and the posthumanities, for example, have started to reformulate academic understanding of nature-cultures based on relational thinking. Although the sustainability crisis serves as a contemporary backdrop and in fact calls for such innovative forms of interdisciplinary scholarship, the field of sustainability research has not yet tapped into the rich possibilities offered by relational thinking. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to identify relational approaches to ontology, epistemology, and ethics which are relevant to sustainability research. More specifically, we analyze how relational approaches have been understood and conceptualized across a broad range of disciplines and contexts relevant to sustainability to identify and harness connections and contributions for future sustainability-related work. Our results highlight common themes and patterns across relational approaches, helping to identify and characterize a relational paradigm within sustainability research. On this basis, we conclude with a call to action for sustainability researchers to co-develop a research agenda for advancing this relational paradigm within sustainability research, practice, and education.
KW - Complexity
KW - New materialism
KW - Posthumanism
KW - Process philosophy
KW - Relationality
KW - Systems theory
KW - Sustainability Science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081331428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/22ef0543-87d3-3ff5-a3fd-08a2f6bac57b/
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-020-01322-y
DO - 10.1007/s13280-020-01322-y
M3 - Scientific review articles
C2 - 32112294
AN - SCOPUS:85081331428
VL - 50
SP - 74
EP - 84
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
SN - 0044-7447
IS - 1
ER -