Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models. / Moschner, Sandra Luisa; Fink, Alexander A.; Kurpjuweit, Stefan et al.
In: Business Horizons, Vol. 62, No. 5, 01.09.2019, p. 637-647.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Moschner, SL, Fink, AA, Kurpjuweit, S, Wagner, SM & Herstatt, C 2019, 'Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models', Business Horizons, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 637-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.006

APA

Vancouver

Moschner SL, Fink AA, Kurpjuweit S, Wagner SM, Herstatt C. Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models. Business Horizons. 2019 Sept 1;62(5):637-647. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.006

Bibtex

@article{0b86195f560d449da8272ca6ef8e9cb1,
title = "Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models",
abstract = "Corporate accelerator programs—accelerators managed by or directly sponsored by one or multiple established firms—are becoming an integral part of startup ecosystems and an important startup engagement vehicle for established firms. Previous research focused either on independent accelerators or on corporate accelerator programs that one established firm operates internally. However, new accelerator models emerged recently, making the corporate accelerator phenomenon more diverse. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the different types of corporate accelerators, along with their objectives and characteristics in order for managers to better understand which type best fits their organization. Our insights on corporate accelerators emerged from secondary data and interviewees from companies and accelerator programs. We used these insights to categorize the programs into four corporate accelerator models that vary according to number of participants and the accelerator's management structure and explain how companies can select the right model for their objectives.",
keywords = "Corporate accelerator, Established firm, New venture, Open innovation, Startup, Management studies",
author = "Moschner, {Sandra Luisa} and Fink, {Alexander A.} and Stefan Kurpjuweit and Wagner, {Stephan M.} and Cornelius Herstatt",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "637--647",
journal = "Business Horizons",
issn = "0007-6813",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models

AU - Moschner, Sandra Luisa

AU - Fink, Alexander A.

AU - Kurpjuweit, Stefan

AU - Wagner, Stephan M.

AU - Herstatt, Cornelius

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Corporate accelerator programs—accelerators managed by or directly sponsored by one or multiple established firms—are becoming an integral part of startup ecosystems and an important startup engagement vehicle for established firms. Previous research focused either on independent accelerators or on corporate accelerator programs that one established firm operates internally. However, new accelerator models emerged recently, making the corporate accelerator phenomenon more diverse. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the different types of corporate accelerators, along with their objectives and characteristics in order for managers to better understand which type best fits their organization. Our insights on corporate accelerators emerged from secondary data and interviewees from companies and accelerator programs. We used these insights to categorize the programs into four corporate accelerator models that vary according to number of participants and the accelerator's management structure and explain how companies can select the right model for their objectives.

AB - Corporate accelerator programs—accelerators managed by or directly sponsored by one or multiple established firms—are becoming an integral part of startup ecosystems and an important startup engagement vehicle for established firms. Previous research focused either on independent accelerators or on corporate accelerator programs that one established firm operates internally. However, new accelerator models emerged recently, making the corporate accelerator phenomenon more diverse. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the different types of corporate accelerators, along with their objectives and characteristics in order for managers to better understand which type best fits their organization. Our insights on corporate accelerators emerged from secondary data and interviewees from companies and accelerator programs. We used these insights to categorize the programs into four corporate accelerator models that vary according to number of participants and the accelerator's management structure and explain how companies can select the right model for their objectives.

KW - Corporate accelerator

KW - Established firm

KW - New venture

KW - Open innovation

KW - Startup

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067486755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.006

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85067486755

VL - 62

SP - 637

EP - 647

JO - Business Horizons

JF - Business Horizons

SN - 0007-6813

IS - 5

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Reviewing the Field of External Knowledge Search for Innovation
  2. Das Land ist ruhig – noch! Notizen zu einer Durchquerung
  3. Evidence that non-social autism traits in the general population are correlated with spatial processing of biological motion
  4. Microfoundations of open innovation in schools: overcoming teachers’ not-invented-here syndrome with transformational leadership and leader-member-exchange
  5. THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF THE CHEMISTRY FIELD IN BRAZIL.
  6. Polizeigewalt
  7. Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models
  8. Barriers to user innovation
  9. Free revealing in open innovation
  10. Glue Embolization of Gastroesophageal Varices during Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Improves Survival Compared to Coil-only Embolization—A Single-Center Retrospective Study
  11. Práticas integrativas e complementares no sistema único de saúde do brasil
  12. Thinking with Laughter: Notes on Walter Benjamin’s Humour
  13. Über die allmähliche Verfertigung des Selbst beim Schreiben
  14. Monopsonistic Labour Markets
  15. Structuring success: How issue-packaging agendas foster better joint outcomes in multi-issue negotiations
  16. How to use analogies for breakthrough innovations
  17. Developing innovations based on analogies
  18. Investigating Learning Assistance by Demonstration for Robotic Wheelchairs
  19. The freedom-fighters
  20. The iceberg of science identity
  21. The teaching area
  22. The vegan trend and the microfoundations of institutional change
  23. Looking for a Needle in a Haystack
  24. Entrepreneurial Members in Online Innovation Communities Blessing or Curse?
  25. Market research for radical innovations - lessons from a lead user project in the field of medical products
  26. Staatliche Gewalt
  27. From a Multicultural to Multinatural Science Education
  28. Gender diversity in academic publishing—comment on Galak and Kahn (2021)
  29. Digitale Transformation gestalten
  30. Virtual Reality Elterngesprächstraining
  31. System Orientation as an Enabler for Sustainable Frugal Engineering