The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control. / Sanden, Joachim; Bachmann, Sascha Dominik.
SSRN Social Science Research Network, 2014. (Social Science Research Network).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

Sanden, J & Bachmann, SD 2014 'The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control' Social Science Research Network, SSRN Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2440717

APA

Sanden, J., & Bachmann, S. D. (2014). The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control. (Social Science Research Network). SSRN Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2440717

Vancouver

Sanden J, Bachmann SD. The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control. SSRN Social Science Research Network. 2014 May 22. (Social Science Research Network). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2440717

Bibtex

@techreport{b6e01dfba4704de5aa7f4543adb9465e,
title = "The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control",
abstract = "The right to {\textquoteleft}security of person{\textquoteright} is well recognised under Human Rights Law, e.g. Art. 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (UDHR), Art. 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 (ICCPR) and under Art. 2, 3 and 5(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950 (ECHR). The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg recognised a right to be protected by the state against violations by third parties (Enhorn v. Sweden [2005] E.C.H.R. 56529/00). Therefore, the obligation of the state (and the corresponding right of the citizen) to secure an individual{\textquoteright}s personal integrity is wider than traditionally thought. Does this right translate into a (positive) right against the state (vertical effect) to protect the citizen{\textquoteright}s health against potential attacks by third (private) parties? Consequently, a State would have to provide a certain level of protection against risks to the individual, from another private party (horizontal effect).Using the examples of the Escherichia coli (E. coli O157) outbreak in Surrey in August 2009 and the EHEC-O104:H4 outbreak 2011 in Germany by Fenugreek Sprouting seeds, this presentation discusses potential human rights implications of food safety hazards across the food chain (see the European crisis management according to Art. 10 of EC regulation 178/2002 and the U.K. Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, the Public Health (Infectious Disease) Regulations 1988 and the Food Safety Act 1990). We will also touch upon potential legal vacuums and loopholes around public and civil safety and security when dealing with new health and environmental threats such as Avian or Swine influenza (flu), which can lead – especially if used as a potential means of bioterrorism – to a national health and security crisis and even mutate into an international pandemic. Consequently, any emergency responses by a state can also directly affect human rights. ",
keywords = "Health sciences, Public Health, Pandemics, Swine Flu, Emergency Measure, European Convention of Human Rights, Law, Environmental planning, Politics",
author = "Joachim Sanden and Bachmann, {Sascha Dominik}",
year = "2014",
month = may,
day = "22",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.2440717",
language = "English",
series = "Social Science Research Network",
publisher = "SSRN Social Science Research Network",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "SSRN Social Science Research Network",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control

AU - Sanden, Joachim

AU - Bachmann, Sascha Dominik

PY - 2014/5/22

Y1 - 2014/5/22

N2 - The right to ‘security of person’ is well recognised under Human Rights Law, e.g. Art. 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (UDHR), Art. 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 (ICCPR) and under Art. 2, 3 and 5(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950 (ECHR). The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg recognised a right to be protected by the state against violations by third parties (Enhorn v. Sweden [2005] E.C.H.R. 56529/00). Therefore, the obligation of the state (and the corresponding right of the citizen) to secure an individual’s personal integrity is wider than traditionally thought. Does this right translate into a (positive) right against the state (vertical effect) to protect the citizen’s health against potential attacks by third (private) parties? Consequently, a State would have to provide a certain level of protection against risks to the individual, from another private party (horizontal effect).Using the examples of the Escherichia coli (E. coli O157) outbreak in Surrey in August 2009 and the EHEC-O104:H4 outbreak 2011 in Germany by Fenugreek Sprouting seeds, this presentation discusses potential human rights implications of food safety hazards across the food chain (see the European crisis management according to Art. 10 of EC regulation 178/2002 and the U.K. Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, the Public Health (Infectious Disease) Regulations 1988 and the Food Safety Act 1990). We will also touch upon potential legal vacuums and loopholes around public and civil safety and security when dealing with new health and environmental threats such as Avian or Swine influenza (flu), which can lead – especially if used as a potential means of bioterrorism – to a national health and security crisis and even mutate into an international pandemic. Consequently, any emergency responses by a state can also directly affect human rights.

AB - The right to ‘security of person’ is well recognised under Human Rights Law, e.g. Art. 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (UDHR), Art. 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 (ICCPR) and under Art. 2, 3 and 5(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950 (ECHR). The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg recognised a right to be protected by the state against violations by third parties (Enhorn v. Sweden [2005] E.C.H.R. 56529/00). Therefore, the obligation of the state (and the corresponding right of the citizen) to secure an individual’s personal integrity is wider than traditionally thought. Does this right translate into a (positive) right against the state (vertical effect) to protect the citizen’s health against potential attacks by third (private) parties? Consequently, a State would have to provide a certain level of protection against risks to the individual, from another private party (horizontal effect).Using the examples of the Escherichia coli (E. coli O157) outbreak in Surrey in August 2009 and the EHEC-O104:H4 outbreak 2011 in Germany by Fenugreek Sprouting seeds, this presentation discusses potential human rights implications of food safety hazards across the food chain (see the European crisis management according to Art. 10 of EC regulation 178/2002 and the U.K. Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, the Public Health (Infectious Disease) Regulations 1988 and the Food Safety Act 1990). We will also touch upon potential legal vacuums and loopholes around public and civil safety and security when dealing with new health and environmental threats such as Avian or Swine influenza (flu), which can lead – especially if used as a potential means of bioterrorism – to a national health and security crisis and even mutate into an international pandemic. Consequently, any emergency responses by a state can also directly affect human rights.

KW - Health sciences

KW - Public Health

KW - Pandemics

KW - Swine Flu

KW - Emergency Measure

KW - European Convention of Human Rights

KW - Law

KW - Environmental planning

KW - Politics

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8d60017d-8124-34ca-95d1-966fc7be662a/

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.2440717

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.2440717

M3 - Working papers

T3 - Social Science Research Network

BT - The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control

PB - SSRN Social Science Research Network

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Julian Müller

Publications

  1. Methan - das unterschätzte Klimagas
  2. Environmental management accounting: development, context, contribution and outlook
  3. The Right to Liberty and Security, Public Health and Disease Control
  4. Migration in der Adoleszenz
  5. Das Ethos reiner Fraulichkeit
  6. Geochemical Assessment of Sediment Quality Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Ennore Creek, North of Chennai, SE Coast of India.
  7. Understanding Cross-Country Differences in Exporter Premia
  8. How To (…) Things That Don’t Exist
  9. There Will Come Soft Rains / Ray Bradbury
  10. The Relevance of Collegial Video-Based Reflection on Teaching for the Development of Reflection-Related Attitudes
  11. The Quality of the KombiFiD-Sample of Enterprises from Manufacturing Industries
  12. 2. Methoden-Muster: Gestaltung von Beziehungen, Kontaktpflege, Klima
  13. Polite rejections
  14. Wind
  15. Plant functional traits and community assembly along interacting gradients of productivity and fragmentation
  16. Prior Entry and Temporal Attention
  17. A transdisciplinary framework for university-industry collaboration in establishing a social business model
  18. Factorial Validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS)
  19. "Der siebente Brunnen". Fred Wanders Versuch einer anderen Darstellung der Shoah in der DDR-Literatur
  20. European Management Styles: Gaining Insights from Stereotypes
  21. Physical self-concept and physical activity enjoyment in elementary school children
  22. Flexibility, dual labour markets, and temporary employment – Empirical evidence from German establishment data
  23. Patterns of ecosystem services supply across farm properties: Implications for ecosystem services-based policy incentives
  24. NFDI4DS Gateway and Portal