The reputation costs of executive misconduct accusations: Evidence from the #MeToo movement
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 38, No. 1, 101196, 01.03.2022.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The reputation costs of executive misconduct accusations
T2 - Evidence from the #MeToo movement
AU - Bouzzine, Yassin Denis
AU - Lueg, Rainer
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/3/1
Y1 - 2022/3/1
N2 - In this study, we examine how sexual harassment accusations against executives affect the stock returns of the affiliated organization. Taking a reputation cost perspective, we identify 98 sexual harassment accusations during 2016–2019, of which 25 directly target organizational executives. We employ an event study methodology to detect abnormal stock reactions for the affiliated organization. The results indicate that #MeToo accusations substantially harmed the stock returns of the organization despite the accusation relating to an individual’s misconduct. We discover significant results only for executives who are employed at the parent organization. Therefore, we first provide evidence that misconduct by individuals matters for organizations. We demonstrate that executive misconduct becomes particularly relevant when the executive assumes a leading position at the parent organization. This finding has important implications for future research and practitioners.
AB - In this study, we examine how sexual harassment accusations against executives affect the stock returns of the affiliated organization. Taking a reputation cost perspective, we identify 98 sexual harassment accusations during 2016–2019, of which 25 directly target organizational executives. We employ an event study methodology to detect abnormal stock reactions for the affiliated organization. The results indicate that #MeToo accusations substantially harmed the stock returns of the organization despite the accusation relating to an individual’s misconduct. We discover significant results only for executives who are employed at the parent organization. Therefore, we first provide evidence that misconduct by individuals matters for organizations. We demonstrate that executive misconduct becomes particularly relevant when the executive assumes a leading position at the parent organization. This finding has important implications for future research and practitioners.
KW - Management studies
KW - #MeToo
KW - Executive misconduct
KW - Sexual harassment accusations
KW - Reputation costs
KW - event study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122999094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0078bd77-c395-3314-8d93-c993ddfb48ef/
U2 - 10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101196
DO - 10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101196
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 38
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Management
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Management
SN - 0956-5221
IS - 1
M1 - 101196
ER -