The Non-Ratification Scenario: Legal and Practical Responses to Mixed Treaty Rejection by Member States

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

The Non-Ratification Scenario: Legal and Practical Responses to Mixed Treaty Rejection by Member States. / Kübek, Gesa.

In: European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2018, p. 21-40.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{246bf060b7ce413e87c4ba9757a23175,
title = "The Non-Ratification Scenario: Legal and Practical Responses to Mixed Treaty Rejection by Member States",
abstract = "The near-death of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) painfully illustrated that the conclusion mixed agreements, i.e. agreements that list the EU, its Member States and a third party as contractors, may be derailed by a negative vote of (sub-)national decision-makers. Such a non-ratification entails a problematic conundrum: Despite the requirement for national ratification under international law, a Member State violates the EU{\textquoteright}s legal principles of conferral and loyal cooperation when vetoing a mixed treaty in its entirety. The present article argues that the Member States are not competent to reject the EU exclusive parts of a mixed treaty in their own right. It suggests that the EU{\textquoteright}s and the Member States{\textquoteright} legal authority to ratify mixed agreements is contingent on who owns and who exercises treaty-making power for substantive components and outlines several practical ways to align national (non-)ratification with the EU{\textquoteright}s law on competences and procedure.",
keywords = "Law",
author = "Gesa K{\"u}bek",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "21--40",
journal = "European Foreign Affairs Review",
issn = "1384-6299",
publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Non-Ratification Scenario: Legal and Practical Responses to Mixed Treaty Rejection by Member States

AU - Kübek, Gesa

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The near-death of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) painfully illustrated that the conclusion mixed agreements, i.e. agreements that list the EU, its Member States and a third party as contractors, may be derailed by a negative vote of (sub-)national decision-makers. Such a non-ratification entails a problematic conundrum: Despite the requirement for national ratification under international law, a Member State violates the EU’s legal principles of conferral and loyal cooperation when vetoing a mixed treaty in its entirety. The present article argues that the Member States are not competent to reject the EU exclusive parts of a mixed treaty in their own right. It suggests that the EU’s and the Member States’ legal authority to ratify mixed agreements is contingent on who owns and who exercises treaty-making power for substantive components and outlines several practical ways to align national (non-)ratification with the EU’s law on competences and procedure.

AB - The near-death of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) painfully illustrated that the conclusion mixed agreements, i.e. agreements that list the EU, its Member States and a third party as contractors, may be derailed by a negative vote of (sub-)national decision-makers. Such a non-ratification entails a problematic conundrum: Despite the requirement for national ratification under international law, a Member State violates the EU’s legal principles of conferral and loyal cooperation when vetoing a mixed treaty in its entirety. The present article argues that the Member States are not competent to reject the EU exclusive parts of a mixed treaty in their own right. It suggests that the EU’s and the Member States’ legal authority to ratify mixed agreements is contingent on who owns and who exercises treaty-making power for substantive components and outlines several practical ways to align national (non-)ratification with the EU’s law on competences and procedure.

KW - Law

UR - http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EERR2018002

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045684320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 23

SP - 21

EP - 40

JO - European Foreign Affairs Review

JF - European Foreign Affairs Review

SN - 1384-6299

IS - 1

ER -