The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction.

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction. / Welzel, Christian Peter; Alexander, Amy.
Hamburg: Institute of Law and Economics (Hamburg), 2017. (ILE Working Paper Series; No. 10/2017).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

Welzel, CP & Alexander, A 2017 'The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction.' ILE Working Paper Series, no. 10/2017, Institute of Law and Economics (Hamburg), Hamburg. <https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ilewps:10>

APA

Welzel, C. P., & Alexander, A. (2017). The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction. (ILE Working Paper Series; No. 10/2017). Institute of Law and Economics (Hamburg). https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ilewps:10

Vancouver

Welzel CP, Alexander A. The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction. Hamburg: Institute of Law and Economics (Hamburg). 2017 Oct. (ILE Working Paper Series; 10/2017).

Bibtex

@techreport{82809a03177e443397d5ce6fc8ac374a,
title = "The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction.",
abstract = "In two widely read articles, Roberto Foa and Yascha Mounk reach the alarming conclusion that support for democracy is in a rapid generational decline. The remarkable point about this diagnosis is its emphasis on the Millennial generation{\textquoteright}s fading support for democracy and the claim that democratic support is steeply eroding in even the most mature democracies. The latter contention marks a significant turning point in the debate. Public discourse has taken a pessimistic tone since quite some time, bemoaning the apparently ubiquitous resurgence of authoritarianism outside the Western world. But the mature democracies of the West seemed to constitute an insurmountable firewall against the authoritarian offense. The novelty in Foa and Mounk{\textquoteright}s analysis is that it questions this very premise, resonating with growing concerns in the face of spreading populism. Indeed, Foa and Mounk imply that the generational erosion of democratic support is responsible for the populist turn throughout the electorates of mature democracies, especially among younger cohorts. In conclusion, Foa and Mounk suggest that democracy itself is in danger, including places where it seemed safest over many generations... ",
keywords = "Politics, Politische Kulturforschung, Gender and diversity",
author = "Welzel, {Christian Peter} and Amy Alexander",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
language = "English",
volume = "10",
series = "ILE Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Institute of Law and Economics (Hamburg)",
number = "10/2017",
address = "Germany",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Institute of Law and Economics (Hamburg)",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Myth of Deconsolidation

T2 - Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction.

AU - Welzel, Christian Peter

AU - Alexander, Amy

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - In two widely read articles, Roberto Foa and Yascha Mounk reach the alarming conclusion that support for democracy is in a rapid generational decline. The remarkable point about this diagnosis is its emphasis on the Millennial generation’s fading support for democracy and the claim that democratic support is steeply eroding in even the most mature democracies. The latter contention marks a significant turning point in the debate. Public discourse has taken a pessimistic tone since quite some time, bemoaning the apparently ubiquitous resurgence of authoritarianism outside the Western world. But the mature democracies of the West seemed to constitute an insurmountable firewall against the authoritarian offense. The novelty in Foa and Mounk’s analysis is that it questions this very premise, resonating with growing concerns in the face of spreading populism. Indeed, Foa and Mounk imply that the generational erosion of democratic support is responsible for the populist turn throughout the electorates of mature democracies, especially among younger cohorts. In conclusion, Foa and Mounk suggest that democracy itself is in danger, including places where it seemed safest over many generations...

AB - In two widely read articles, Roberto Foa and Yascha Mounk reach the alarming conclusion that support for democracy is in a rapid generational decline. The remarkable point about this diagnosis is its emphasis on the Millennial generation’s fading support for democracy and the claim that democratic support is steeply eroding in even the most mature democracies. The latter contention marks a significant turning point in the debate. Public discourse has taken a pessimistic tone since quite some time, bemoaning the apparently ubiquitous resurgence of authoritarianism outside the Western world. But the mature democracies of the West seemed to constitute an insurmountable firewall against the authoritarian offense. The novelty in Foa and Mounk’s analysis is that it questions this very premise, resonating with growing concerns in the face of spreading populism. Indeed, Foa and Mounk imply that the generational erosion of democratic support is responsible for the populist turn throughout the electorates of mature democracies, especially among younger cohorts. In conclusion, Foa and Mounk suggest that democracy itself is in danger, including places where it seemed safest over many generations...

KW - Politics

KW - Politische Kulturforschung

KW - Gender and diversity

M3 - Working papers

VL - 10

T3 - ILE Working Paper Series

BT - The Myth of Deconsolidation

PB - Institute of Law and Economics (Hamburg)

CY - Hamburg

ER -