1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. The hand of God or the hand of Maradona?...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

The hand of God or the hand of Maradona? Believing in free will increases perceived intentionality of others’ behavior

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

The hand of God or the hand of Maradona? Believing in free will increases perceived intentionality of others’ behavior. / Genschow, Oliver; Rigoni, Davide; Brass, Marcel.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 70, 01.04.2019, p. 80-87.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Genschow, O, Rigoni, D & Brass, M 2019, 'The hand of God or the hand of Maradona? Believing in free will increases perceived intentionality of others’ behavior', Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 70, pp. 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.004

APA

Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., & Brass, M. (2019). The hand of God or the hand of Maradona? Believing in free will increases perceived intentionality of others’ behavior. Consciousness and Cognition, 70, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.004

Vancouver

Genschow O, Rigoni D, Brass M. The hand of God or the hand of Maradona? Believing in free will increases perceived intentionality of others’ behavior. Consciousness and Cognition. 2019 Apr 1;70:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.004

Bibtex

@article{4c2ba563505e47fa9f3a6cae72b34afe,
title = "The hand of God or the hand of Maradona? Believing in free will increases perceived intentionality of others{\textquoteright} behavior",
abstract = "The question of whether free will actually exists has been debated in philosophy for centuries. However, how belief in free will shapes the perception of our social environment still remains open. Here we investigate whether belief in free will affects how much intentionality we attribute to other people. Study 1a and 1b demonstrate a weak positive relation between the strength of belief in free will and the perceived intentionality of soccer players committing handball. This pattern even holds for behavior that is objectively not intentional (i.e., when the player touches the ball accidentally). Going one step further, in Study 2 we find a weak correlation between belief in free will and perceiving intentions in very abstract geometrical shapes. These findings suggest that whether individuals believe in free will or not changes the way they interpret others{\textquoteright} behavior, which may have important societal consequences.",
keywords = "Belief in free will, Intention attribution, Interpersonal perception, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Davide Rigoni and Marcel Brass",
note = "Funding Information: This research was partially funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation{\textquoteright}s Philosophy and Science of Self-Control Project ( 15462 ). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Inc.",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.004",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "80--87",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The hand of God or the hand of Maradona? Believing in free will increases perceived intentionality of others’ behavior

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Rigoni, Davide

AU - Brass, Marcel

N1 - Funding Information: This research was partially funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation’s Philosophy and Science of Self-Control Project ( 15462 ). Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - The question of whether free will actually exists has been debated in philosophy for centuries. However, how belief in free will shapes the perception of our social environment still remains open. Here we investigate whether belief in free will affects how much intentionality we attribute to other people. Study 1a and 1b demonstrate a weak positive relation between the strength of belief in free will and the perceived intentionality of soccer players committing handball. This pattern even holds for behavior that is objectively not intentional (i.e., when the player touches the ball accidentally). Going one step further, in Study 2 we find a weak correlation between belief in free will and perceiving intentions in very abstract geometrical shapes. These findings suggest that whether individuals believe in free will or not changes the way they interpret others’ behavior, which may have important societal consequences.

AB - The question of whether free will actually exists has been debated in philosophy for centuries. However, how belief in free will shapes the perception of our social environment still remains open. Here we investigate whether belief in free will affects how much intentionality we attribute to other people. Study 1a and 1b demonstrate a weak positive relation between the strength of belief in free will and the perceived intentionality of soccer players committing handball. This pattern even holds for behavior that is objectively not intentional (i.e., when the player touches the ball accidentally). Going one step further, in Study 2 we find a weak correlation between belief in free will and perceiving intentions in very abstract geometrical shapes. These findings suggest that whether individuals believe in free will or not changes the way they interpret others’ behavior, which may have important societal consequences.

KW - Belief in free will

KW - Intention attribution

KW - Interpersonal perception

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062492951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.004

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 30856544

AN - SCOPUS:85062492951

VL - 70

SP - 80

EP - 87

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

ER -

Related by journal

Low working memory reduces the use of mental contrasting

Timur Sevincer, A., Schröder, A., Plakides, A., Edler, N. & Oettingen, G., 01.02.2024, In: Consciousness and Cognition. 118, 13 p., 103644.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research

The role of free will beliefs in social behavior: Priority areas for future research

Quinton, T. S., Trafimow, D. & Genschow, O., 01.10.2023, In: Consciousness and Cognition. 115, 8 p., 103586.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Free to blame? Belief in free will is related to victim blaming

Genschow, O. & Vehlow, B., 01.02.2021, In: Consciousness and Cognition. 88, 103074.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Other publications by the same author(s)

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., Pronizius, E., Broek, K. L. V. D., Vlasceanu, D., Constantino, S., Morais, M. J., Schumann, P., Rathje, S., Fang, K., Aglioti, S. M., Alfano, M., Alvarado-Yepez, A. J., Andersen, A., Anseel, F., Apps, M. A. J., Asadli, C., Awuor, F. J., Azevedo, F., Basaglia, P., Bélanger, J. J., Berger, S., Bertin, P., Białek, M., Bialobrzeska, O., Blaya-Burgo, M., Bleize, D. N. M., Bø, S., Boecker, L., Boggio, P. S., Borau, S., Bos, B., Bouguettaya, A., Brauer, M., Brick, C., Brik, T., Briker, R., Brosch, T., Buchel, O., Buonauro, D., Butalia, R., Carvacho, H., Chamberlain, S. A. E., Chan, H-Y., Chow, D., Chung, D., Cian, L., Cohen-Eick, N., Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Contu, D., Cristea, V., Cutler, J., D'Ottone, S., Keersmaecker, J. D., Delcourt, S., Delouvée, S., Diel, K., Douglas, B. D., Drupp, M. A., Dubey, S., Ekmanis, J., Elbaek, C. T., Elsherif, M., Engelhard, I. M., Escher, Y. A., Etienne, T. W., Farage, L., Farias, A. R., Feuerriegel, S., Findor, A., Freira, L., Friese, M., Gains, N. P., Gallyamova, A., Geiger, S. J., Genschow, O., Gjoneska, B., Gkinopoulos, T., Goldberg, B., Goldenberg, A., Gradidge, S., Grassini, S., Gray, K., Grelle, S., Griffin, S. M., Grigoryan, L., Grigoryan, A., Grigoryev, D., Gruber, J., Guilaran, J., Hadar, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., Halperin, E., Harvey, A. J., Haugestad, C. A. P., Herman, A. M., Hershfield, H. E., Himichi, T., Hine, D. W., Hofmann, W., Howe, L., Huaman-Chulluncuy, E. T., Huang, G., Ishii, T., Ito, A., Jia, F., Jost, J. T., Jovanović, V., Jurgiel, D., Kácha, O., Kankaanpää, R., Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Mintz, K. K., Kaya, I., Kaya, O., Khachatryan, N., Klas, A., Klein, C., Klöckner, C. A., Koppel, L., Kosachenko, A. I., Kothe, E. J., Krebs, R., Krosch, A. R., Krouwel, A. P. M., Kyrychenko, Y., Lagomarsino, M., Lamm, C., Lange, F., Cunningham, J. L., Lees, J., Leung, T. Y., Levy, N., Lockwood, P. L., Longoni, C., Ortega, A. L., Loschelder, D. D., Lu, J. G., Luo, Y., Luomba, J., Lutz, A. E., Majer, J. M., Markowitz, E., Marsh, A. A., Mascarenhas, K. L., Mbilingi, B., Mbungu, W., McHugh, C., Meijers, M. H. C., Mercier, H., Mhagama, F. L., Michalakis, K., Mikus, N., Milliron, S., Mitkidis, P., Monge-Rodríguez, F. S., Mora, Y. L., Moreau, D., Motoki, K., Moyano, M., Mus, M., Navajas, J., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, D. M., Nguyen, T., Niemi, L., Nijssen, S. R. R., Nilsonne, G., Nitschke, J. P., Nockur, L., Okura, R., Öner, S., Özdoğru, A. A., Palumbo, H., Panagopoulos, C., Panasiti, M. S., Pärnamets, P., Paruzel-Czachura, M., Pavlov, Y. G., Payán-Gómez, C., Pearson, A. R., Costa, L. P. D., Petrowsky, H. M., Pfattheicher, S., Pham, N. T., Ponizovskiy, V., Pretus, C., Rêgo, G. G., Reimann, R., Rhoads, S. A., Riano-Moreno, J., Richter, I., Röer, J. P., Rosa-Sullivan, J., Ross, R. M., Sabherwal, A., Saito, T., Sarrasin, O., Say, N., Schmid, K., Schmitt, M. T., Schoenegger, P., Scholz, C., Schug, M. G., Schulreich, S., Shreedhar, G., Shuman, E., Sivan, S., Sjåstad, H., Soliman, M., Soud, K., Spampatti, T., Sparkman, G., Spasovski, O., Stanley, S. K., Stern, J. A., Strahm, N., Suko, Y., Sul, S., Syropoulos, S., Taylor, N. C., Tedaldi, E., Tinghög, G., Huynh, L. D. T., Travaglino, G. A., Tsakiris, M., Tüter, İ., Tyrala, M., Uluğ, Ö. M., Urbanek, A., Valko, D., Linden, S. V. D., Schie, K. V., Stekelenburg, A. V., Vanags, E., Västfjäll, D., Vesely, S., Vintr, J., Vranka, M., Wanguche, P. O., Willer, R., Wojcik, A. D., Xu, R., Yadav, A., Zawisza, M., Zhao, X., Zhao, J., Żuk, D. & Bavel, J. J. V., 09.02.2024, In: Science Advances. 10, 6, 19 p., eadj5778.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Imitation as social influence

Genschow, O. & Oomen, D., 2024, (Accepted/In press) The research handbook on social influence. Edward Elgar Publishing

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

The spillover effect of mimicry: Being mimicked by one person increases prosocial behavior toward another person

Muniak, P., Genschow, O., Dolinski, D., Grzyb, T. & Kulesza, W., 01.07.2024, In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 113, 12 p., 104620.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Covert and overt automatic imitation are correlated

Cracco, E., Genschow, O. & Brass, M., 27.11.2023, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Do unbiased people act more rationally? - The case of comparative realism and vaccine intention

Izydorczak, K., Dolinski, D., Genschow, O., Kulesza, W., Muniak, P., Casara, B. G. S. & Suitner, C., 01.02.2023, In: Royal Society Open Science. 10, 2, 19 p., 220775.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

DOI