Testing the limits of jurisdiction in investor-state arbitration in svalbard’s waters: Peteris pildegovics and sia north star v. kingdom of norway

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c19a9996db384192b08a03792cdef224,
title = "Testing the limits of jurisdiction in investor-state arbitration in svalbard{\textquoteright}s waters: Peteris pildegovics and sia north star v. kingdom of norway",
abstract = "On 1 April 2020, the Latvian fishing company SIA North Star and its owner Peteris Pildegovics initiated an investor-State arbitration against Norway (Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway) at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). This case is not only Norway{\textquoteright}s first ever ICSID case, but also the first publicly known investor-State arbitration in which an operator of a fishing vessel has brought a claim against a coastal State for allegedly unlawful exercise of prescriptive and enforcement jurisdiction in relation to fisheries. The case raises intricate questions concerning the limits of jurisdiction ratione materiae and jurisdiction ratione personae of investment tribunals.",
keywords = "Law",
author = "Schatz, {Valentin J.}",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "25",
doi = "10.23865/arctic.v12.3372",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "167--171",
journal = "Arctic Review on Law and Politics",
issn = "2387-4562",
publisher = "Nordic Open Scholarly Publishing (NOASP)",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the limits of jurisdiction in investor-state arbitration in svalbard’s waters

T2 - Peteris pildegovics and sia north star v. kingdom of norway

AU - Schatz, Valentin J.

PY - 2021/8/25

Y1 - 2021/8/25

N2 - On 1 April 2020, the Latvian fishing company SIA North Star and its owner Peteris Pildegovics initiated an investor-State arbitration against Norway (Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway) at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). This case is not only Norway’s first ever ICSID case, but also the first publicly known investor-State arbitration in which an operator of a fishing vessel has brought a claim against a coastal State for allegedly unlawful exercise of prescriptive and enforcement jurisdiction in relation to fisheries. The case raises intricate questions concerning the limits of jurisdiction ratione materiae and jurisdiction ratione personae of investment tribunals.

AB - On 1 April 2020, the Latvian fishing company SIA North Star and its owner Peteris Pildegovics initiated an investor-State arbitration against Norway (Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway) at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). This case is not only Norway’s first ever ICSID case, but also the first publicly known investor-State arbitration in which an operator of a fishing vessel has brought a claim against a coastal State for allegedly unlawful exercise of prescriptive and enforcement jurisdiction in relation to fisheries. The case raises intricate questions concerning the limits of jurisdiction ratione materiae and jurisdiction ratione personae of investment tribunals.

KW - Law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114105188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.23865/arctic.v12.3372

DO - 10.23865/arctic.v12.3372

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85114105188

VL - 12

SP - 167

EP - 171

JO - Arctic Review on Law and Politics

JF - Arctic Review on Law and Politics

SN - 2387-4562

ER -

DOI