Taxing your cake and growing it too: public beliefs on the dual benefits of progressive taxation
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal of Public Policy, 2025.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Taxing your cake and growing it too
T2 - public beliefs on the dual benefits of progressive taxation
AU - Becker, Bastian
AU - Castanho Silva, Bruno
AU - Lierse, Hanna
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Political and economic elites often warn that taxes on the rich impair economic growth. Although such warnings have a long tradition in elite discourse, what the public believes about the effects of progressive taxation remains surprisingly understudied. This omission limits our understanding of a basic democratic mechanism, the congruence of elite and public opinion. To close this gap, we employ a conjoint experiment during the 2021 German national election on a representative quota sample. Participants compare policy packages that entail changes in income, inheritance, and corporate taxes and evaluate their impact on equality and growth. We find no evidence that the public believes that progressive taxes promote equality at the expense of growth. Instead, participants believe that progressive taxes are doubly beneficial, promoting both outcomes. Furthermore, such beliefs do not vary by ideology or economic status. Our findings suggest a more consensual view of progressive taxation that emphasizes positive synergies between economic growth and greater equality.
AB - Political and economic elites often warn that taxes on the rich impair economic growth. Although such warnings have a long tradition in elite discourse, what the public believes about the effects of progressive taxation remains surprisingly understudied. This omission limits our understanding of a basic democratic mechanism, the congruence of elite and public opinion. To close this gap, we employ a conjoint experiment during the 2021 German national election on a representative quota sample. Participants compare policy packages that entail changes in income, inheritance, and corporate taxes and evaluate their impact on equality and growth. We find no evidence that the public believes that progressive taxes promote equality at the expense of growth. Instead, participants believe that progressive taxes are doubly beneficial, promoting both outcomes. Furthermore, such beliefs do not vary by ideology or economic status. Our findings suggest a more consensual view of progressive taxation that emphasizes positive synergies between economic growth and greater equality.
KW - conjoint experiment
KW - growth
KW - inequality
KW - redistribution
KW - taxation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105021645901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0143814X25100858
DO - 10.1017/S0143814X25100858
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:105021645901
JO - Journal of Public Policy
JF - Journal of Public Policy
SN - 0143-814X
ER -
