Taboo metaphtonymy, gender, and impoliteness: how male and female Arab cartoonists think and draw
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Social Semiotics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 03.2024, p. 331-367.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Taboo metaphtonymy, gender, and impoliteness
T2 - how male and female Arab cartoonists think and draw
AU - Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - The debate about whether the sexes communicate and behave differently continues. The stereotype that women are not funny or that their language or behavior is more “ladylike” is very widespread and has been current for decades, if not centuries. Gender differences in politeness and humor were also frequently reported by early anthropologists, sociolinguists, and cognitivists, but many modern linguists are far from convinced by such findings. Examining multimodal communication, a development phase within many fields, may help us find evidence to support or undermine a sociocognitive hypothesis such as women are more polite or are naturally less funny than men. Using a corpus of political cartoons, this study identifies whether there are gender differences in the use of taboo language and humor, putting special emphasis on impolite metaphor and metonymy. The results of this research show no differences between male and female cartoonists in the use of taboo or impolite metaphors and metonymies. Rather, individual variations are reported. This analysis, then, offers a new window on an age-old question about how men and women think, communicate, and behave.
AB - The debate about whether the sexes communicate and behave differently continues. The stereotype that women are not funny or that their language or behavior is more “ladylike” is very widespread and has been current for decades, if not centuries. Gender differences in politeness and humor were also frequently reported by early anthropologists, sociolinguists, and cognitivists, but many modern linguists are far from convinced by such findings. Examining multimodal communication, a development phase within many fields, may help us find evidence to support or undermine a sociocognitive hypothesis such as women are more polite or are naturally less funny than men. Using a corpus of political cartoons, this study identifies whether there are gender differences in the use of taboo language and humor, putting special emphasis on impolite metaphor and metonymy. The results of this research show no differences between male and female cartoonists in the use of taboo or impolite metaphors and metonymies. Rather, individual variations are reported. This analysis, then, offers a new window on an age-old question about how men and women think, communicate, and behave.
KW - humor
KW - intercultural impoliteness
KW - male and female cartoonists
KW - taboo metaphtonymy
KW - Tabooness
KW - English
KW - Literature studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136934800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/d1c1e5e5-5d31-3028-b2da-6035ced50579/
U2 - 10.1080/10350330.2022.2113971
DO - 10.1080/10350330.2022.2113971
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85136934800
VL - 34
SP - 331
EP - 367
JO - Social Semiotics
JF - Social Semiotics
SN - 1035-0330
IS - 3
ER -