Success of collaboration for sustainable agriculture: a case study meta-analysis

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

More and better collaboration between farmers and other stakeholders has repeatedly been identified as a key strategy for sustainable agriculture. However, for collaboration to actually benefit sustainable agriculture certain conditions have to be met. In this paper, we scrutinize the conditions that support or hamper the success of collaborative efforts in the context of sustainable agriculture. For this purpose, we conducted an exploratory case study meta-analysis to consolidate insights from 30 case studies on local and regional collaborative groups for a more sustainable agriculture in the EU. Through multiple regression analysis, we evaluated which factors influence the ‘success’ of such collaboratives. Thereby, we measured success through five explicit and comprehensive success criteria. We found two external, five actor-related, and five organization and management-related factors to decisively influence the different success criteria. Overall, our results highlight that collaboration success requires defining priorities as for each of the success criteria a different set of factors is decisive. Although our results showed trade-offs between the achievement of social and economic goals, it is possible to pursue some success criteria simultaneously. Furthermore, our results give reason to be optimistic about the performance of collaboratives: internal factors, which are in the hand of the collaboratives, are likely to be of greater importance than uncontrollable external conditions. Additionally, conditions encountered at the outset of a collaborative matter less than the way these conditions develop toward later stages. Thus, rather than depending on external and predefined conditions, success largely depends on the agency within the collaboratives.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
Volume23
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)14619–14641
Number of pages23
ISSN1387-585X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10.2021

Bibliographical note

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work received funding by the ERA NET project MULTAGRI, supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under grant no. 033RA01B, and by the Innovation-Incubator at Leuphana University, TM 1.4 Graduate School.

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. An analysis of local institutions governing common pasture use for biodiversity and society in Transylvania, Romania
  2. Correction to
  3. Nanotechnology and Ethics
  4. Ertragsteuerrecht
  5. Zwischen Animismus und Animation – Krieg und (Virtual) Reality bei Harun Farocki
  6. Die neukonzipierte Lehre der Universität St. Gallen und ihr Kontextstudium als ein Weg zu nachhaltiger Bildung
  7. Inspektionsbasierte Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung
  8. Biocultural approaches to sustainability
  9. Effect of fetal calf serum on the corrosion behaviour of magnesium alloys
  10. Anpassung des Bodenschutzrechts an den Klimaschutz
  11. Fate and Effects of Little Investigated Scents in the Aquatic Environment
  12. The global economic crisis as a critical juncture?
  13. Walt O’Disney and the Little People
  14. Lautheitsurteil und akustischer Kontext
  15. BGH: Qualifikation einer mit einem Erbverzicht verbundenen Zuwendung als Schenkung (Anmerkung)
  16. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of green waste: An environmental and economic assessment of HTC coal in the metropolitan region of Berlin, Germany
  17. Corrigendum to ‘Cold season ammonia emissions from land spreading with anaerobic digestates from biogas production’ [Atmos. Environ. 84 (2014) 35–38]
  18. Fehler beim schätzen
  19. Gesundheit spielend fördern.
  20. Dialogorientierte Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung von Hochschulen : eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Leuphana-Universität Lüneburg
  21. Unterrichtsqualität durch Bildungsstandards
  22. Évaluation du potentiel allélopathique des composés hydrosolubles de l’orge (Hordeum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare) et du grand brome (Bromus diandrus Roth.) moyennant un bio-essai modifié