Scientific consensus on sustainability: The case of the natural step
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Sustainable Development, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2000, p. 180-190.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific consensus on sustainability
T2 - The case of the natural step
AU - Upham, Paul
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - The Natural Step (TNS) is internationally promoted as the basis of a scientific consensus on sustainability. TNS appears potentially consensual because it argues from a position of summary trends that are scientifically informed. However, comparison with other sustainability principles shows that this appearance is unjustified. Firstly, this is because sustainability principles vary widely in their implications and purpose. Secondly, TNS is ambiguous in its approach to risk assessment and controversial in its implied proposal for zero growth in the physical parameters of the human economy, biodegradable material excepted. Two concepts from the sociology of science are used to account for international corporate and public uptake of TNS, despite its ambiguity and highly precautionary message. These are the boundary object and anchoring devices. TNS illustrates how operationalization of sustainability theories unavoidably involves value judgements relating to the choice of features to be sustained, despite any scientific content that those theories may have. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
AB - The Natural Step (TNS) is internationally promoted as the basis of a scientific consensus on sustainability. TNS appears potentially consensual because it argues from a position of summary trends that are scientifically informed. However, comparison with other sustainability principles shows that this appearance is unjustified. Firstly, this is because sustainability principles vary widely in their implications and purpose. Secondly, TNS is ambiguous in its approach to risk assessment and controversial in its implied proposal for zero growth in the physical parameters of the human economy, biodegradable material excepted. Two concepts from the sociology of science are used to account for international corporate and public uptake of TNS, despite its ambiguity and highly precautionary message. These are the boundary object and anchoring devices. TNS illustrates how operationalization of sustainability theories unavoidably involves value judgements relating to the choice of features to be sustained, despite any scientific content that those theories may have. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
KW - Sustainability Science
KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033669493&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1099-1719(200011)8:4<180::AID-SD143>3.0.CO;2-R
DO - 10.1002/1099-1719(200011)8:4<180::AID-SD143>3.0.CO;2-R
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:0033669493
VL - 8
SP - 180
EP - 190
JO - Sustainable Development
JF - Sustainable Development
SN - 0968-0802
IS - 4
ER -