Scientific consensus on sustainability: The case of the natural step

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Scientific consensus on sustainability: The case of the natural step. / Upham, Paul.
In: Sustainable Development, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2000, p. 180-190.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Upham P. Scientific consensus on sustainability: The case of the natural step. Sustainable Development. 2000;8(4):180-190. doi: 10.1002/1099-1719(200011)8:4<180::AID-SD143>3.0.CO;2-R

Bibtex

@article{a9ce57ad65fd4ecbb0caef5d397abd29,
title = "Scientific consensus on sustainability: The case of the natural step",
abstract = "The Natural Step (TNS) is internationally promoted as the basis of a scientific consensus on sustainability. TNS appears potentially consensual because it argues from a position of summary trends that are scientifically informed. However, comparison with other sustainability principles shows that this appearance is unjustified. Firstly, this is because sustainability principles vary widely in their implications and purpose. Secondly, TNS is ambiguous in its approach to risk assessment and controversial in its implied proposal for zero growth in the physical parameters of the human economy, biodegradable material excepted. Two concepts from the sociology of science are used to account for international corporate and public uptake of TNS, despite its ambiguity and highly precautionary message. These are the boundary object and anchoring devices. TNS illustrates how operationalization of sustainability theories unavoidably involves value judgements relating to the choice of features to be sustained, despite any scientific content that those theories may have. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Sustainability sciences, Management &amp; Economics, Sustainability sciences, Communication",
author = "Paul Upham",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1002/1099-1719(200011)8:4<180::AID-SD143>3.0.CO;2-R",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "180--190",
journal = "Sustainable Development",
issn = "0968-0802",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific consensus on sustainability

T2 - The case of the natural step

AU - Upham, Paul

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The Natural Step (TNS) is internationally promoted as the basis of a scientific consensus on sustainability. TNS appears potentially consensual because it argues from a position of summary trends that are scientifically informed. However, comparison with other sustainability principles shows that this appearance is unjustified. Firstly, this is because sustainability principles vary widely in their implications and purpose. Secondly, TNS is ambiguous in its approach to risk assessment and controversial in its implied proposal for zero growth in the physical parameters of the human economy, biodegradable material excepted. Two concepts from the sociology of science are used to account for international corporate and public uptake of TNS, despite its ambiguity and highly precautionary message. These are the boundary object and anchoring devices. TNS illustrates how operationalization of sustainability theories unavoidably involves value judgements relating to the choice of features to be sustained, despite any scientific content that those theories may have. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

AB - The Natural Step (TNS) is internationally promoted as the basis of a scientific consensus on sustainability. TNS appears potentially consensual because it argues from a position of summary trends that are scientifically informed. However, comparison with other sustainability principles shows that this appearance is unjustified. Firstly, this is because sustainability principles vary widely in their implications and purpose. Secondly, TNS is ambiguous in its approach to risk assessment and controversial in its implied proposal for zero growth in the physical parameters of the human economy, biodegradable material excepted. Two concepts from the sociology of science are used to account for international corporate and public uptake of TNS, despite its ambiguity and highly precautionary message. These are the boundary object and anchoring devices. TNS illustrates how operationalization of sustainability theories unavoidably involves value judgements relating to the choice of features to be sustained, despite any scientific content that those theories may have. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management &amp; Economics

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033669493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1099-1719(200011)8:4<180::AID-SD143>3.0.CO;2-R

DO - 10.1002/1099-1719(200011)8:4<180::AID-SD143>3.0.CO;2-R

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:0033669493

VL - 8

SP - 180

EP - 190

JO - Sustainable Development

JF - Sustainable Development

SN - 0968-0802

IS - 4

ER -