Robust measurement of (heavy-tailed) risks: Theory and implementation
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 61, 01.12.2015, p. 183-203.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Robust measurement of (heavy-tailed) risks
T2 - Theory and implementation
AU - Schneider, Judith C.
AU - Schweizer, Nikolaus
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Every model presents an approximation of reality and thus modeling inevitably implies model risk. We quantify model risk in a non-parametric way, i.e., in terms of the divergence from a so-called nominal model. Worst-case risk is defined as the maximal risk among all models within a given divergence ball. We derive several new results on how different divergence measures affect the worst case. Moreover, we present a novel, empirical way built on model confidence sets (MCS) for choosing the radius of the divergence ball around the nominal model, i.e., for calibrating the amount of model risk. We demonstrate the implications of heavy-tailed risks for the choice of the divergence measure and the empirical divergence estimation. For heavy-tailed risks, the simulation of the worst-case distribution is numerically intricate. We present a Sequential Monte Carlo algorithm which is suitable for this task. An extended practical example, assessing the robustness of a hedging strategy, illustrates our approach.
AB - Every model presents an approximation of reality and thus modeling inevitably implies model risk. We quantify model risk in a non-parametric way, i.e., in terms of the divergence from a so-called nominal model. Worst-case risk is defined as the maximal risk among all models within a given divergence ball. We derive several new results on how different divergence measures affect the worst case. Moreover, we present a novel, empirical way built on model confidence sets (MCS) for choosing the radius of the divergence ball around the nominal model, i.e., for calibrating the amount of model risk. We demonstrate the implications of heavy-tailed risks for the choice of the divergence measure and the empirical divergence estimation. For heavy-tailed risks, the simulation of the worst-case distribution is numerically intricate. We present a Sequential Monte Carlo algorithm which is suitable for this task. An extended practical example, assessing the robustness of a hedging strategy, illustrates our approach.
KW - Divergence estimation
KW - Model risk
KW - Risk management
KW - Robustness
KW - Sequential Monte Carlo
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947423461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jedc.2015.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jedc.2015.09.010
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:84947423461
VL - 61
SP - 183
EP - 203
JO - Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
JF - Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
SN - 0165-1889
ER -