Rethinking megafauna
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Standard
In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B , Vol. 287, No. 1922, 20192643, 11.03.2020.
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking megafauna
AU - Moleón, Marcos
AU - Sánchez-Zapata, José A.
AU - Donázar, José A.
AU - Revilla, Eloy
AU - Martín-López, Berta
AU - Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Cayetano
AU - Getz, Wayne M.
AU - Morales-Reyes, Zebensui
AU - Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa
AU - Crowder, Larry B.
AU - Galetti, Mauro
AU - González-Suárez, Manuela
AU - He, Fengzhi
AU - Jordano, Pedro
AU - Lewison, Rebecca
AU - Naidoo, Robin
AU - Owen-Smith, Norman
AU - Selva, Nuria
AU - Svenning, Jens Christian
AU - Tella, José L.
AU - Zarfl, Christiane
AU - Jähnig, Sonja C.
AU - Hayward, Matt W.
AU - Faurby, Søren
AU - García, Nuria
AU - Barnosky, Anthony D.
AU - Tockner, Klement
PY - 2020/3/11
Y1 - 2020/3/11
N2 - Concern for megafauna is increasing among scientists and non-scientists. Many studies have emphasized that megafauna play prominent ecological roles and provide important ecosystem services to humanity. But, what precisely are 'megafauna'? Here, we critically assess the concept of megafauna and propose a goal-oriented framework for megafaunal research. First, we review definitions of megafauna and analyse associated terminology in the scientific literature. Second, we conduct a survey among ecologists and palaeontologists to assess the species traits used to identify and define megafauna. Our review indicates that definitions are highly dependent on the study ecosystem and research question, and primarily rely on ad hoc size-related criteria. Our survey suggests that body size is crucial, but not necessarily sufficient, for addressing the different applications of the term megafauna. Thus, after discussing the pros and cons of existing definitions, we propose an additional approach by defining two function-oriented megafaunal concepts: 'keystone megafauna' and 'functional megafauna', with its variant 'apex megafauna'. Assessing megafauna from a functional perspective could challenge the perception that there may not be a unifying definition of megafauna that can be applied to all eco-evolutionary narratives. In addition, using functional definitions of megafauna could be especially conducive to cross-disciplinary understanding and cooperation, improvement of conservation policy and practice, and strengthening of public perception. As megafaunal research advances, we encourage scientists to unambiguously define how they use the term 'megafauna' and to present the logic underpinning their definition.
AB - Concern for megafauna is increasing among scientists and non-scientists. Many studies have emphasized that megafauna play prominent ecological roles and provide important ecosystem services to humanity. But, what precisely are 'megafauna'? Here, we critically assess the concept of megafauna and propose a goal-oriented framework for megafaunal research. First, we review definitions of megafauna and analyse associated terminology in the scientific literature. Second, we conduct a survey among ecologists and palaeontologists to assess the species traits used to identify and define megafauna. Our review indicates that definitions are highly dependent on the study ecosystem and research question, and primarily rely on ad hoc size-related criteria. Our survey suggests that body size is crucial, but not necessarily sufficient, for addressing the different applications of the term megafauna. Thus, after discussing the pros and cons of existing definitions, we propose an additional approach by defining two function-oriented megafaunal concepts: 'keystone megafauna' and 'functional megafauna', with its variant 'apex megafauna'. Assessing megafauna from a functional perspective could challenge the perception that there may not be a unifying definition of megafauna that can be applied to all eco-evolutionary narratives. In addition, using functional definitions of megafauna could be especially conducive to cross-disciplinary understanding and cooperation, improvement of conservation policy and practice, and strengthening of public perception. As megafaunal research advances, we encourage scientists to unambiguously define how they use the term 'megafauna' and to present the logic underpinning their definition.
KW - apex predators
KW - body size
KW - functional traits
KW - keystone species
KW - large animals
KW - megaherbivores
KW - Ecosystems Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081042715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/30fb8296-9125-3fb9-b01b-2a7b1d7b9e51/
U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2019.2643
DO - 10.1098/rspb.2019.2643
M3 - Scientific review articles
C2 - 32126954
VL - 287
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B
SN - 0962-8452
IS - 1922
M1 - 20192643
ER -