Reconciling Analytics with Holistic Thinking in Business Sustainability Decision-Making

Research output: Journal contributionsConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

Standard

Reconciling Analytics with Holistic Thinking in Business Sustainability Decision-Making. / Benkert, Julia.
In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2019, No. 1, 01.08.2019.

Research output: Journal contributionsConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6fed2d5c1cbb4872baaabbe2c9dee01d,
title = "Reconciling Analytics with Holistic Thinking in Business Sustainability Decision-Making",
abstract = "One of the core questions with respect to business sustainability is how managerial decision-makers in organizations can be encouraged to make more sustainable choices. However, relevant decision-making dynamics, including the role of managerial values and attitudes, are still poorly understood. In prior research, the focus on firm practices as proxies for managers{\textquoteright} values and preferences has left the relevant antecedents of business sustainability decision-making largely unaddressed. In building on Keeney{\textquoteright}s value-focused thinking approach, this study provides a framework for capturing managers{\textquoteright} sustainability values systematically and precisely, which allows for their integration into formal analysis of business sustainability decision-making. Further, we also examine whether the prevalence of holistic thinking in organizational decision-making paradigms influences managers{\textquoteright} sustainability values. The reason for the focus on holistic thinking is that the concept of business sustainability is grounded in a holistic paradigm that emphasizes simultaneous interrelationships between environmental, social, and economic aspects of sustainability. We use data from a survey with executive managers in the procurement and supply chain functions based in Australia to test our hypotheses, and to establish a typology of managerial sustainability values with reference to decision-making for business sustainability.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Julia Benkert",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/ambpp.2019.17339abstract",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
issn = "0065-0668",
publisher = "Academy of Management (Briarcliff Manor, NY) ",
number = "1",
note = "79th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management - AOM 2019 : Understanding the Inclusive Organization, AOM 2019 ; Conference date: 09-08-2019 Through 13-08-2019",
url = "https://my.aom.org/program2019/, http://aom.org/Meetings/Past-Meetings/",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconciling Analytics with Holistic Thinking in Business Sustainability Decision-Making

AU - Benkert, Julia

N1 - Conference code: 79

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - One of the core questions with respect to business sustainability is how managerial decision-makers in organizations can be encouraged to make more sustainable choices. However, relevant decision-making dynamics, including the role of managerial values and attitudes, are still poorly understood. In prior research, the focus on firm practices as proxies for managers’ values and preferences has left the relevant antecedents of business sustainability decision-making largely unaddressed. In building on Keeney’s value-focused thinking approach, this study provides a framework for capturing managers’ sustainability values systematically and precisely, which allows for their integration into formal analysis of business sustainability decision-making. Further, we also examine whether the prevalence of holistic thinking in organizational decision-making paradigms influences managers’ sustainability values. The reason for the focus on holistic thinking is that the concept of business sustainability is grounded in a holistic paradigm that emphasizes simultaneous interrelationships between environmental, social, and economic aspects of sustainability. We use data from a survey with executive managers in the procurement and supply chain functions based in Australia to test our hypotheses, and to establish a typology of managerial sustainability values with reference to decision-making for business sustainability.

AB - One of the core questions with respect to business sustainability is how managerial decision-makers in organizations can be encouraged to make more sustainable choices. However, relevant decision-making dynamics, including the role of managerial values and attitudes, are still poorly understood. In prior research, the focus on firm practices as proxies for managers’ values and preferences has left the relevant antecedents of business sustainability decision-making largely unaddressed. In building on Keeney’s value-focused thinking approach, this study provides a framework for capturing managers’ sustainability values systematically and precisely, which allows for their integration into formal analysis of business sustainability decision-making. Further, we also examine whether the prevalence of holistic thinking in organizational decision-making paradigms influences managers’ sustainability values. The reason for the focus on holistic thinking is that the concept of business sustainability is grounded in a holistic paradigm that emphasizes simultaneous interrelationships between environmental, social, and economic aspects of sustainability. We use data from a survey with executive managers in the procurement and supply chain functions based in Australia to test our hypotheses, and to establish a typology of managerial sustainability values with reference to decision-making for business sustainability.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/429b112b-db8f-338f-a0de-b5476e7fecbb/

U2 - 10.5465/ambpp.2019.17339abstract

DO - 10.5465/ambpp.2019.17339abstract

M3 - Conference abstract in journal

VL - 2019

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

T2 - 79th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management - AOM 2019

Y2 - 9 August 2019 through 13 August 2019

ER -