Psychological distance modulates goal-based versus movement-based imitation

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Psychological distance modulates goal-based versus movement-based imitation. / Genschow, Oliver; Hansen, Jochim; Wänke, Michaela et al.
In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 45, No. 8, 08.2019, p. 1031-1048.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{055034b7dfc14562abf0aaae4dc093de,
title = "Psychological distance modulates goal-based versus movement-based imitation",
abstract = "In past research on imitation, some findings suggest that imitation is goal based, whereas other findings suggest that imitation can also be based on a direct mapping of a model's movements without necessarily adopting the model's goal. We argue that the 2 forms of imitation are flexibly deployed in accordance with the psychological distance from the model. We specifically hypothesize that individuals are relatively more likely to imitate the model's goals when s/he is distant but relatively more likely to imitate the model's specific movements when s/he is proximal. This hypothesis was tested in 4 experiments using different imitation paradigms and different distance manipulations. Experiment 1 served as a pilot study and demonstrated that temporal distance (vs. proximity) increased imitation of a goal relative to the imitation of a movement. Experiments 2 and 3 measured goal-based and movementbased imitation independently of each other and found that spatial distance (vs. proximity) decreased the rate of goal errors (indicating more goal imitation) compared with movement errors. Experiment 4 demonstrated that psychological distance operates most likely at the input-that is, perceptual-level. The findings are discussed in relation to construal level theory and extant theories of imitation.",
keywords = "Construal level, Goal, Imitation, Movement, Psychological distance, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Jochim Hansen and Michaela W{\"a}nke and Yaacov Trope",
note = "Funding Information: Oliver Genschow and Jochim Hansen contributed equally to this article and appear in alphabetical order as first authors. We thank Pinar Gezer, Sophie Graffius, Clarissa Gyssen, Josefine Kriwy, Maximilian L{\"u}dke, Johanna Mi-chelbach, Manuel Stabenow, Tania Valero-Sch{\"o}nh{\"o}ft, and Johanna Werz for their help creating the materials and conducting the experiments, as well as Chiara Jutzi, Stefan Rei{\ss}, and Thomas Scherndl for their help with the statistical analyses. This research was supported by grant P25307-G22 from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) awarded to Jochim Hansen. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 American Psychological Association.",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1037/xhp0000654",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1031--1048",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological distance modulates goal-based versus movement-based imitation

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Hansen, Jochim

AU - Wänke, Michaela

AU - Trope, Yaacov

N1 - Funding Information: Oliver Genschow and Jochim Hansen contributed equally to this article and appear in alphabetical order as first authors. We thank Pinar Gezer, Sophie Graffius, Clarissa Gyssen, Josefine Kriwy, Maximilian Lüdke, Johanna Mi-chelbach, Manuel Stabenow, Tania Valero-Schönhöft, and Johanna Werz for their help creating the materials and conducting the experiments, as well as Chiara Jutzi, Stefan Reiß, and Thomas Scherndl for their help with the statistical analyses. This research was supported by grant P25307-G22 from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) awarded to Jochim Hansen. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 American Psychological Association.

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - In past research on imitation, some findings suggest that imitation is goal based, whereas other findings suggest that imitation can also be based on a direct mapping of a model's movements without necessarily adopting the model's goal. We argue that the 2 forms of imitation are flexibly deployed in accordance with the psychological distance from the model. We specifically hypothesize that individuals are relatively more likely to imitate the model's goals when s/he is distant but relatively more likely to imitate the model's specific movements when s/he is proximal. This hypothesis was tested in 4 experiments using different imitation paradigms and different distance manipulations. Experiment 1 served as a pilot study and demonstrated that temporal distance (vs. proximity) increased imitation of a goal relative to the imitation of a movement. Experiments 2 and 3 measured goal-based and movementbased imitation independently of each other and found that spatial distance (vs. proximity) decreased the rate of goal errors (indicating more goal imitation) compared with movement errors. Experiment 4 demonstrated that psychological distance operates most likely at the input-that is, perceptual-level. The findings are discussed in relation to construal level theory and extant theories of imitation.

AB - In past research on imitation, some findings suggest that imitation is goal based, whereas other findings suggest that imitation can also be based on a direct mapping of a model's movements without necessarily adopting the model's goal. We argue that the 2 forms of imitation are flexibly deployed in accordance with the psychological distance from the model. We specifically hypothesize that individuals are relatively more likely to imitate the model's goals when s/he is distant but relatively more likely to imitate the model's specific movements when s/he is proximal. This hypothesis was tested in 4 experiments using different imitation paradigms and different distance manipulations. Experiment 1 served as a pilot study and demonstrated that temporal distance (vs. proximity) increased imitation of a goal relative to the imitation of a movement. Experiments 2 and 3 measured goal-based and movementbased imitation independently of each other and found that spatial distance (vs. proximity) decreased the rate of goal errors (indicating more goal imitation) compared with movement errors. Experiment 4 demonstrated that psychological distance operates most likely at the input-that is, perceptual-level. The findings are discussed in relation to construal level theory and extant theories of imitation.

KW - Construal level

KW - Goal

KW - Imitation

KW - Movement

KW - Psychological distance

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069521045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xhp0000654

DO - 10.1037/xhp0000654

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 31135170

AN - SCOPUS:85069521045

VL - 45

SP - 1031

EP - 1048

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 8

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Tobias Rahm

Publications

  1. If You Have a Hammer, You Only Look for Nails
  2. Future-Proofing Fuel Cells
  3. Local Use of Antibiotics and their Input and Fate in a Small Sewage Treatment Plant
  4. ‘I can show you; here’s the video’–video-supported student-led debates in game-based approaches
  5. Governance of professional service firms: a configurational approach
  6. Zwischen Disruption und Integration
  7. Assessment of key competencies
  8. Aufbruch?!
  9. Entrepreneurship and the "theory of planned behavior"
  10. Benchmarking nesting aids for cavity-nesting bees and wasps
  11. Precipitation hardening on mechanical and corrosion properties of extruded Mg10Gd modified with Nd and La
  12. The documentary method
  13. Human trafficking in nairaland digital community: A corpus-assisted critical discourse study
  14. Gaseous nitrogen losses from urea applied to maize on a calcareous fluvo-aquic soil in the North China Plain
  15. Normalisierung und Ausschluss
  16. Remote Sensing Data
  17. Souveräne Bindungen
  18. Why Art Criticism? A Reader
  19. From Making to Displaying: The Role of Organizational Space in Showing Creative Coolness at the Volkshotel
  20. Fest oder flüssig? Nichtnewtonsche Stoffsysteme
  21. Ambient Assisted Living
  22. Deriving Collaboration Cases in Production Networks Considering Smart Services
  23. Probing alignment of personal and organisational values for sustainability
  24. Correction: Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research(PLoS ONE (2019) 14:10(e0223675) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223675)
  25. Die schwache Gewalt?
  26. Semi-infinite Optimierung
  27. Stock price reactions to climate science information from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  28. Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services
  29. Crises in education and social change, 1780-2000
  30. E/Z isomerism without a double bond - An unusual type of stereoisomerism, and an unprecedented isomerisation in a bicyclobutane
  31. Translating children’s literature: what, for whom, how, and why. A basic map of actors, factors and contexts
  32. Testing Lazear's Jack-of-all-trades
  33. Report on the First CELIS NOW Conference ‘The Age of Open Strategic Autonomy’
  34. Tourist perceptions of summer weather in Scandinavia
  35. Freie Pizzawahl für Informatiker und Wirtschaftsinformatiker
  36. NFDI4DS Transfer and Application
  37. Justice in environmental institutions - How do frameworks for institutional analysis consider ideas of justice?
  38. What do citizens in tax havens think? The EU blacklist and public opinion in Switzerland
  39. Effects of facebook activities on the performance of start-ups
  40. Existential insecurity and trust during the COVID-19 pandemic
  41. Threshold stress during tensile and compressive creep in AE42 magnesium alloy
  42. Direct negative density-dependence in a pond-breeding frog population
  43. Edge Effects
  44. Hidden in full view