Productivity and the product scope of multi-product firms: a test of Feenstra-Ma

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Feenstra and Ma (2008) develop a monopolistic competition model where firms choose their optimal product scope by balancing the profits from a new variety against the costs of "cannibalizing" sales of existing varieties. While more productive firms always have a higher market share, there is no monotonic relationship between firms' productivity level and their choices of product scope. In the model having a higher market share means that firms are hurt more by the "cannibalization effect". Therefore, the incentive to add more products weakens as productivity rises. This leads to Lemma 3 in Feenstra and Ma (2008): There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between firms' productivities and the range of varieties they choose to produce. This empirical note takes this Lemma to the data for firms from German manufacturing industries. Empirical evidence is in line with the results from the theoretical model.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEconomics Bulletin
Volume33
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)415-419
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe
  2. Monitoring networking between higher education institutions and regional actors
  3. Gender in Trouble
  4. Accounting for Eco-Efficiency
  5. Trust Centrality in Online Social Networks
  6. A world of abundance
  7. The effects of hybrid order processing strategies on economic and logistic objectives
  8. Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education
  9. Effect of the gap width in AZ31 magnesium alloy joints obtained by friction stir welding
  10. Challenges in Education A Deweyan Assessment of AI Technologies in the Classroom
  11. Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders
  12. Happy just because. A cross-cultural study on subjective wellbeing in three Indigenous societies
  13. Occurrence and Air-sea exchange of phthalates in the Arctic
  14. On anisotropic tensile mechanical behavior of Al-Cu-Li AA2198 alloy under different ageing conditions
  15. Influence of strontium, silicon and calcium additions on the properties of the AM50 alloy
  16. Working time dimensions and well-being
  17. Interventionen im Datenraum
  18. Special issue: Frameworks for Sustainability Management
  19. Scenes of Empowerment: Virtual Racial Diversity and Digital Divides
  20. Application of non-target analysis with LC-HRMS for the monitoring of raw and potable water
  21. Responsibility and Economics
  22. Whistle-Blowing heißt nicht: "verpfeifen"
  23. Imagining ways forward
  24. Systemic aspects of auditory interactive art in the public sphere.
  25. The "Attention" Entrapment Phenomenon
  26. The Making of Urban Computing Environments
  27. Migration
  28. SOFTWARE - SOUND-Spiele.
  29. The quantitative organization of speech
  30. Prozessoptimierung macht stark
  31. Impacts of software and its engineering on the carbon footprint of ICT
  32. Article 30 Review Clause
  33. Begriff und Merkmale junger Unternehmen
  34. Effectiveness of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in nurses with shift work sleep disorder