Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Sonia Valdivia
  • Jana Gerta Backes
  • Marzia Traverso
  • Guido Sonnemann
  • Stefano Cucurachi
  • Jeroen B. Guinée
  • Thomas Schaubroeck
  • Matthias Finkbeiner
  • Noemie Leroy-Parmentier
  • Cássia Ugaya
  • Claudia Peña
  • Alessandra Zamagni
  • Atsushi Inaba
  • Milena Amaral
  • Markus Berger
  • Jolanta Dvarioniene
  • Tatiana Vakhitova
  • Catherine Benoit-Norris
  • Martina Prox
  • Rajendra Foolmaun
  • And 1 others
  • Mark Goedkoop

Purpose and context: This paper aims to establish principles for the increased application and use of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). Sustainable development (SD) encompassing resilient economies and social stability of the global system is growingly important for decision-makers from business and governments. The “17 SDGs” emerge as a high-level shared blueprint for peace, abundance, and prosperity for people and the planet, and “sustainability” for supporting improvements of products and organizations. A “sustainability” interpretation—successful in aligning stakeholders’ understanding—subdivides the impacts according to a triple bottom line or three pillars: economic, social, and environmental impacts. These context and urgent needs inspired the LCSA framework. This entails a sustainability assessment of products and organizations in accordance with the three pillars, while adopting a life cycle perspective. Methods: The Life Cycle Initiative promotes since 2011 a pragmatic LCSA framework based on the three techniques: LCSA = environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) + life cycle costing (LCC) + social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). This is the focus of the paper, while acknowledging previous developments. Identified and reviewed literature shows challenges of addressing the three pillars in the LCSA framework implementation like considering only two pillars; not being fully aligned with ISO 14040; lacking interconnectedness among the three pillars; not having clear criteria for results’ weighting nor clear results’ interpretation; and not following cause-effect chains and mechanisms leading to an endpoint. Agreement building among LCSA experts and reviewing processes strengthened the consensus on this paper. Broad support and outreach are ensured by publishing this as position paper. Results: For harmonizing practical LCSA applications, easing interpretation, and increasing usefulness, consensed ten LCSA principles (10P) are established: understanding the areas of protection, alignment with ISO 14040, completeness, stakeholders’ and product utility considerations, materiality of system boundaries, transparency, consistency, explicit trade-offs’ communication, and caution when compensating impacts. Examples were provided based on a fictional plastic water bottle Conclusions: In spite of increasing needs for and interest in SD and sustainability supporting tools, LCSA is at an early application stage of application. The 10P aim to promote more and better LCSA applications by ensuring alignment with ISO 14040, completeness and clear interpretation of integrated results, among others. For consolidating its use, however, more consensus-building is needed (e.g., on value-laden ethical aspects of LCSA, interdependencies and interconnectedness among the three dimensions, and harmonization and integration of the three techniques) and technical and policy recommendations for application.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume26
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1900-1905
Number of pages6
ISSN0948-3349
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09.2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Cooperation and Trust in the Context of SMEs
  2. Crown and leaf traits as predictors of subtropical tree sapling growth rates
  3. The Contribution of Education for Sustainable Development in Promoting Sustainable Water Use
  4. The F.D.P.
  5. Der Flaneur in einer "quälenden Doppelwelt"
  6. Semi-stationary shoulder bobbin-tool
  7. Commentary LIAB
  8. Mela Hartwig: Ekstasen. Novellen
  9. Land sparing versus land sharing
  10. Process Development for Wire-based Laser Metal Deposition of 5087 Aluminium alloy by using Fibre Laser
  11. Transdisciplinary Partnerships for Developing Sustainable Food Forests
  12. Between Fostering and Outsourcing Educational Justice: The EU-Turkey Statement and its Impacts on the Education of "Refugee Students" in Turkey
  13. Independence, Accountability and Perceived Quality of Regulators
  14. Situative bewegungssimulation des zweibeinigen, parallelkinematischen schreitroboters centaurob
  15. Bärenstark
  16. Sonnenscheinchen
  17. Towards gender equality in the Ukrainian society
  18. Alkohol Myopie
  19. Ökofeminismus
  20. Optimales Anlagevermögen von Versicherungsunternehmen
  21. Error management or error prevention
  22. PoNa – Shaping Nature: Policy, Politics and Polity. Inter- and transdisciplinary research in the policy areas of rural development and agro-biotechnology
  23. Compressive strength and hot deformation mechanisms in as-cast Mg-4Al-2Ba-2Ca (ABaX422) alloy
  24. Human behavior and sustainability
  25. Kinderliterarisches Übersetzen
  26. Reallabore als Lernräume
  27. Bildung und Emanzipation
  28. De Publieksbijdrage
  29. Enterprise Integration
  30. Marktorientierte Markenbewertung
  31. Design guidelines for metal binder jetting
  32. Handelsgesetzbuch
  33. Transnational collaboration for sustainability in higher education
  34. The role of institutions in food system transformations