Predictions of entrepreneurial behavior: A personality approach

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Standard

Predictions of entrepreneurial behavior: A personality approach. / Rauch, Andreas.
Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. ed. / Elizabeth Chell; Mine Karatas-Özkan. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. p. 165–184.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Harvard

Rauch, A 2014, Predictions of entrepreneurial behavior: A personality approach. in E Chell & M Karatas-Özkan (eds), Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 165–184. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809245.00018

APA

Rauch, A. (2014). Predictions of entrepreneurial behavior: A personality approach. In E. Chell, & M. Karatas-Özkan (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship (pp. 165–184). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809245.00018

Vancouver

Rauch A. Predictions of entrepreneurial behavior: A personality approach. In Chell E, Karatas-Özkan M, editors, Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2014. p. 165–184 doi: 10.4337/9781849809245.00018

Bibtex

@inbook{c766207094b441d38afe09704a4df3ba,
title = "Predictions of entrepreneurial behavior: A personality approach",
abstract = "The personality approach to entrepreneurship intends to show the relationship between personality traits and entrepreneurial behavior such as opportunity recognition, and outcomes such as business creation and business success. Studies in this tradition aimed to identify the most important personality characteristics and, moreover, aimed to understand the conditions under which these traits predict entrepreneurial behavior. Personality theory is one of the classical approaches to explain the activities of enterprising individuals. One reason for this interest is based on early economic theorizing about the role of entrepreneurship in economic growth. For example, Schumpeter (1935) explained economic growth by innovations that destroy equilibrium conditions. The agents of this creative destruction are entrepreneurs that are characterized by innovativeness, foresight, dominance and a desire to create a kingdom (Utsch, Rauch, Rothfuss, & Frese, 1999). Knight (1921) described entrepreneurship as decision-making under uncertainty. McClelland (1961) introduced achievement motivation theory in order to explain economic growth. And even more recent economic theorizing that stressed the role of market disequilibrium and knowledge asymmetries introduced the alertness construct to explain which people recognize business opportunities (Kirzner, 1997). This early interest in personality characteristics was also picked up in numerous books and articles in the popular press describing success stories of entrepreneurs such as Steve Jobs, Richard Branson, or Oprah Winfrey. Nevertheless, the scientific community has criticized the personality approach heavily during the eighties (Chell, 1985; Brockhaus & Horwitz, 1986; Gartner, 1988). Several issues have stimulated the critique.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurship",
author = "Andreas Rauch",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4337/9781849809245.00018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781849809238",
pages = "165–184",
editor = "Elizabeth Chell and Mine Karatas-{\"O}zkan",
booktitle = "Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Predictions of entrepreneurial behavior

T2 - A personality approach

AU - Rauch, Andreas

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The personality approach to entrepreneurship intends to show the relationship between personality traits and entrepreneurial behavior such as opportunity recognition, and outcomes such as business creation and business success. Studies in this tradition aimed to identify the most important personality characteristics and, moreover, aimed to understand the conditions under which these traits predict entrepreneurial behavior. Personality theory is one of the classical approaches to explain the activities of enterprising individuals. One reason for this interest is based on early economic theorizing about the role of entrepreneurship in economic growth. For example, Schumpeter (1935) explained economic growth by innovations that destroy equilibrium conditions. The agents of this creative destruction are entrepreneurs that are characterized by innovativeness, foresight, dominance and a desire to create a kingdom (Utsch, Rauch, Rothfuss, & Frese, 1999). Knight (1921) described entrepreneurship as decision-making under uncertainty. McClelland (1961) introduced achievement motivation theory in order to explain economic growth. And even more recent economic theorizing that stressed the role of market disequilibrium and knowledge asymmetries introduced the alertness construct to explain which people recognize business opportunities (Kirzner, 1997). This early interest in personality characteristics was also picked up in numerous books and articles in the popular press describing success stories of entrepreneurs such as Steve Jobs, Richard Branson, or Oprah Winfrey. Nevertheless, the scientific community has criticized the personality approach heavily during the eighties (Chell, 1985; Brockhaus & Horwitz, 1986; Gartner, 1988). Several issues have stimulated the critique.

AB - The personality approach to entrepreneurship intends to show the relationship between personality traits and entrepreneurial behavior such as opportunity recognition, and outcomes such as business creation and business success. Studies in this tradition aimed to identify the most important personality characteristics and, moreover, aimed to understand the conditions under which these traits predict entrepreneurial behavior. Personality theory is one of the classical approaches to explain the activities of enterprising individuals. One reason for this interest is based on early economic theorizing about the role of entrepreneurship in economic growth. For example, Schumpeter (1935) explained economic growth by innovations that destroy equilibrium conditions. The agents of this creative destruction are entrepreneurs that are characterized by innovativeness, foresight, dominance and a desire to create a kingdom (Utsch, Rauch, Rothfuss, & Frese, 1999). Knight (1921) described entrepreneurship as decision-making under uncertainty. McClelland (1961) introduced achievement motivation theory in order to explain economic growth. And even more recent economic theorizing that stressed the role of market disequilibrium and knowledge asymmetries introduced the alertness construct to explain which people recognize business opportunities (Kirzner, 1997). This early interest in personality characteristics was also picked up in numerous books and articles in the popular press describing success stories of entrepreneurs such as Steve Jobs, Richard Branson, or Oprah Winfrey. Nevertheless, the scientific community has criticized the personality approach heavily during the eighties (Chell, 1985; Brockhaus & Horwitz, 1986; Gartner, 1988). Several issues have stimulated the critique.

KW - Entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957451303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4337/9781849809245.00018

DO - 10.4337/9781849809245.00018

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781849809238

SP - 165

EP - 184

BT - Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

A2 - Chell, Elizabeth

A2 - Karatas-Özkan, Mine

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Vor der maximalen strategischen Herausforderung
  2. Interkulturelle Narration. Zur Theorie und Praxis der Analyse und Interpretation - am Beispiel einer Palästina-Reportage von Richard A. Bermann
  3. Die Rückkehr der Plantafel
  4. Freiheit durch Bindung
  5. Islamophobia without Muslims? The "contact Hypothesis" as an Explanation for Anti-Muslim Attitudes - Eastern European Societies in a Comparative Perspective
  6. Housing in the Margins: Negotiating Urban Formalities in Berlin's Allotment Gardens
  7. Ecotoxicological evaluation of selected anticancer drugs
  8. Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies
  9. UV-photodegradation of desipramine
  10. Wie ein Fisch im Trockenen?
  11. Treffen der Generationen
  12. Qualitätssicherung durch studentische Lehrevaluation
  13. Individuationskräfte
  14. Trading many goods with many countries: Exporters and importers from German manufacturing industries
  15. Renewable Energy
  16. Forschendes Lernen auf Hochschul- und Unterrichtsebene beforschen
  17. COVID-19 stressors and health behaviors
  18. Was wirkt? Der Plakatparcours - ein Erfahrungsbericht
  19. Lekcja 25-26
  20. Mehr Transparenz wagen
  21. Old-growth beech forests in Germany as cool islands in a warming landscape
  22. Digitalization, structuration and agency in organizations concerned with the placement of refugee parents in institutions of early childhood care and education
  23. "Wehrhaft" und "resilient"? Wie sich Demokratien verteidigen
  24. Theatralisierung des Alltags
  25. A three-dimensional framework to explore corporate sustainability activities in the mining industry
  26. Managing entrepreneurial and corporate contributions to sustainability transitions
  27. Überzeugungen von Lehramtsstudierenden zu Mehrsprachigkeit in der Schule.
  28. Towards sustainable land uses within the Elbe river biosphere reserve in Lower Saxony, Germany by means of TerraSAR-X images
  29. "Worte sind hier umsonst"
  30. Focus Group Practice
  31. Konzeptionelle Grundlagen des Hochschulmanagements
  32. Mit dem Rechenwege-Quartett Rechenwege erkunden