Peter Sloterdijk (1947b)

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Peter Sloterdijk (1947b). / Beyes, Timon.
The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. ed. / Jenny Helin ; Tor Hernes; Daniel Hjorth; Robin Holt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 567-584.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Beyes, T 2014, Peter Sloterdijk (1947b). in J Helin , T Hernes, D Hjorth & R Holt (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 567-584. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0035

APA

Beyes, T. (2014). Peter Sloterdijk (1947b). In J. Helin , T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, & R. Holt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies (pp. 567-584). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0035

Vancouver

Beyes T. Peter Sloterdijk (1947b). In Helin J, Hernes T, Hjorth D, Holt R, editors, The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. p. 567-584 doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0035

Bibtex

@inbook{acd90597525f47819a385c04da84d333,
title = "Peter Sloterdijk (1947b)",
abstract = "Peter Sloterdijk is a German philosopher and public intellectual whose work constitutes an original philosophy of becoming, of processes of formation and self-formation. Due to his wide-ranging interests––he has been called a {\textquoteleft}morphological thinker{\textquoteright} and a {\textquoteleft}trainee{\textquoteright} experimenting with new forms and combinations of thought––and his outspoken disdain for the {\textquoteleft}scholastic aberrance{\textquoteright} of institutional philosophy, Sloterdijk has become a singular and contested figure in the intellectual landscape. This chapter examines Sloterdijk{\textquoteright}s body of thought and its relevance to organization studies, especially with regard to embodiment, space, affect, and a scholarly ethics of generosity. In particular, it discusses his notions of {\textquoteleft}coming-into-the-world{\textquoteright} and relational movement, cynicism and kynicism, anthropotechnics and acrobatics, spatiality and (atmo)sphere, and thymotic energies and psychopolitics.",
keywords = "Digital media",
author = "Timon Beyes",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0035",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-19-874653-9",
pages = "567--584",
editor = "{Helin }, Jenny and Tor Hernes and Hjorth, {Daniel } and Robin Holt",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Peter Sloterdijk (1947b)

AU - Beyes, Timon

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Peter Sloterdijk is a German philosopher and public intellectual whose work constitutes an original philosophy of becoming, of processes of formation and self-formation. Due to his wide-ranging interests––he has been called a ‘morphological thinker’ and a ‘trainee’ experimenting with new forms and combinations of thought––and his outspoken disdain for the ‘scholastic aberrance’ of institutional philosophy, Sloterdijk has become a singular and contested figure in the intellectual landscape. This chapter examines Sloterdijk’s body of thought and its relevance to organization studies, especially with regard to embodiment, space, affect, and a scholarly ethics of generosity. In particular, it discusses his notions of ‘coming-into-the-world’ and relational movement, cynicism and kynicism, anthropotechnics and acrobatics, spatiality and (atmo)sphere, and thymotic energies and psychopolitics.

AB - Peter Sloterdijk is a German philosopher and public intellectual whose work constitutes an original philosophy of becoming, of processes of formation and self-formation. Due to his wide-ranging interests––he has been called a ‘morphological thinker’ and a ‘trainee’ experimenting with new forms and combinations of thought––and his outspoken disdain for the ‘scholastic aberrance’ of institutional philosophy, Sloterdijk has become a singular and contested figure in the intellectual landscape. This chapter examines Sloterdijk’s body of thought and its relevance to organization studies, especially with regard to embodiment, space, affect, and a scholarly ethics of generosity. In particular, it discusses his notions of ‘coming-into-the-world’ and relational movement, cynicism and kynicism, anthropotechnics and acrobatics, spatiality and (atmo)sphere, and thymotic energies and psychopolitics.

KW - Digital media

UR - https://books.google.de/books?id=X-F_AwAAQBAJ&pg=PR5&hl=de&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0035

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0035

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-0-19-874653-9

SP - 567

EP - 584

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies

A2 - Helin , Jenny

A2 - Hernes, Tor

A2 - Hjorth, Daniel

A2 - Holt, Robin

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -