Personal initiative training for small business owners
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Vol. 5, 2016, p. 27-36.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Personal initiative training for small business owners
AU - Frese, Michael
AU - Hass, Lydia
AU - Friedrich, Christian
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Research shows that personal initiative is important for small business owners’ success (Frese, 2009). An intervention study in Germany evaluated a 3-day personal initiative intervention program for small scale business owners. This intervention consisted of a training that taught a proactive, self-starting approach to planning, innovation, time management and goal-setting and the ability to overcome barriers. A before-and-after design was used for the training group (N=36); the dependent variable was employment growth which we also measured in a comparison group (N=97). Measures were ascertained before the intervention, directly afterwards and 1 year after the training. We found positive changes after the training and the participants of the training group employed about 20% more employees after the training than before or than existed in the comparison group. Positive effects occurred on all four of Kirkpatrick's (1975) evaluation levels: reaction, learning, behavior-based, and success measures.
AB - Research shows that personal initiative is important for small business owners’ success (Frese, 2009). An intervention study in Germany evaluated a 3-day personal initiative intervention program for small scale business owners. This intervention consisted of a training that taught a proactive, self-starting approach to planning, innovation, time management and goal-setting and the ability to overcome barriers. A before-and-after design was used for the training group (N=36); the dependent variable was employment growth which we also measured in a comparison group (N=97). Measures were ascertained before the intervention, directly afterwards and 1 year after the training. We found positive changes after the training and the participants of the training group employed about 20% more employees after the training than before or than existed in the comparison group. Positive effects occurred on all four of Kirkpatrick's (1975) evaluation levels: reaction, learning, behavior-based, and success measures.
KW - Experiment with non-random comparison group
KW - Personal Initiative
KW - Psychological approach
KW - Training of Entrepreneurship
KW - Entrepreneurship
KW - Business psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982261359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.01.001
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:84982261359
VL - 5
SP - 27
EP - 36
JO - Journal of Business Venturing Insights
JF - Journal of Business Venturing Insights
SN - 2352-6734
ER -