Patching Meaningfulness: How Early Career Scholars Construct Meaning in a Pluralistic Work Context
Research output: Journal contributions › Conference abstract in journal › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2022, No. 1, 11432, 01.08.2022.
Research output: Journal contributions › Conference abstract in journal › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Patching Meaningfulness:
T2 - 83. Jahrestagung des Verbandes der HochschullehrerInnen für Betriebswirtschaftslehre 2022
AU - Duesterbeck, Johanne Ragna
AU - Habersang, Stefanie
N1 - Conference code: 83
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Despite an increasing interest in the concept of meaningfulness at work, so far, relatively little research has been conducted on how the construction of meaningfulness evolves in pluralistic work contexts. We explore the construction of meaningfulness in pluralistic contexts by drawing on the case of academia, particularly the experiences of early career scholars (ECS) in Germany. We found that ECS draw on three competing discourses about legitimate academic work: the “performance discourse”, the “intellectual discourse” and the “engagement discourse”. The competing nature of these discourses generates tensions for ECS and the need to engage in a practice that we label patching meaningfulness. Our study contributes to the emerging stream of research that conceptualizes meaningfulness as a constant tension between the “self” and “others”. We show that work roles pose an important channel enabling scholars to perpetuate multiple valued self-definitions in a context of conflicting ideals about academic work. Similarly, we contribute to the literature that understands meaningfulness as inherently temporal and episodic.
AB - Despite an increasing interest in the concept of meaningfulness at work, so far, relatively little research has been conducted on how the construction of meaningfulness evolves in pluralistic work contexts. We explore the construction of meaningfulness in pluralistic contexts by drawing on the case of academia, particularly the experiences of early career scholars (ECS) in Germany. We found that ECS draw on three competing discourses about legitimate academic work: the “performance discourse”, the “intellectual discourse” and the “engagement discourse”. The competing nature of these discourses generates tensions for ECS and the need to engage in a practice that we label patching meaningfulness. Our study contributes to the emerging stream of research that conceptualizes meaningfulness as a constant tension between the “self” and “others”. We show that work roles pose an important channel enabling scholars to perpetuate multiple valued self-definitions in a context of conflicting ideals about academic work. Similarly, we contribute to the literature that understands meaningfulness as inherently temporal and episodic.
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188104170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2022.117
DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2022.117
M3 - Conference abstract in journal
VL - 2022
JO - Academy of Management Proceedings
JF - Academy of Management Proceedings
SN - 0065-0668
IS - 1
M1 - 11432
Y2 - 3 March 2022 through 11 March 2022
ER -