Old wine in new bottles ? The actual and potential contribution of civil society organisations to democratic governance in Europe

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

Old wine in new bottles ? The actual and potential contribution of civil society organisations to democratic governance in Europe. / Friedrich, Dawid.
Oslo: ARENA - Centre for European Studies, 2007. (RECON Online Working Paper; Vol. 2007, No. 08).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@techreport{53aa3578d7894712b4992f5f21353fe2,
title = "Old wine in new bottles ?: The actual and potential contribution of civil society organisations to democratic governance in Europe",
abstract = "Political science literature often claims that the participation of civil societyorganisations increases the democratic quality of policy-making in internationalgovernance arrangements. However, it remains unclear under what conditions such a democratic value can be achieved and how the empirical reality of this participation relates to the alleged democracy-enhancing quality. In recent years, the European initiatives to establish a civil dialogue, to improve the consultation with civil society organisations and above all the White Paper on European Governance have triggered some scientific expectations that the EU seeks to establish a participatory regime which possibly improves the democratic character of EU policy-making.The central hypothesis put forward in this paper is that the participation of civilsociety organisations is only then of democratic value if it takes place in anenvironment of clear rules; thus, an argument is made for a regulated model ofparticipation which is both normatively meaningful and practically feasible. Thesafeguarding functions of legally enforceable rights to participation ensuredemocratic instead of lobbying-like participation.Based on normative theoretical reflections on the democratic value of participation of civil society organisations as well as on empirical research in the fields of environmental policy (chemicals, REACH) and migration policy (familyreunification), this paper argues that the EU has not yet established an approach to participation that increases the democratic quality of EU policy-making but that it rather follows a voluntaristic and instrumental approach. Nevertheless, some developments in the environmental area give reason for cautious optimism that the EU might move towards a more democratic participatory regime of policy-making.",
keywords = "Politics, Europ{\"a}ische Demokratie, Europ{\"a}ische Zivilgesellschaft, Europ{\"a}ische Union / REACH-Verordnung , Migration, Partizipation ",
author = "Dawid Friedrich",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
series = "RECON Online Working Paper",
publisher = "ARENA - Centre for European Studies",
number = "08",
address = "Norway",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "ARENA - Centre for European Studies",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Old wine in new bottles ?

T2 - The actual and potential contribution of civil society organisations to democratic governance in Europe

AU - Friedrich, Dawid

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Political science literature often claims that the participation of civil societyorganisations increases the democratic quality of policy-making in internationalgovernance arrangements. However, it remains unclear under what conditions such a democratic value can be achieved and how the empirical reality of this participation relates to the alleged democracy-enhancing quality. In recent years, the European initiatives to establish a civil dialogue, to improve the consultation with civil society organisations and above all the White Paper on European Governance have triggered some scientific expectations that the EU seeks to establish a participatory regime which possibly improves the democratic character of EU policy-making.The central hypothesis put forward in this paper is that the participation of civilsociety organisations is only then of democratic value if it takes place in anenvironment of clear rules; thus, an argument is made for a regulated model ofparticipation which is both normatively meaningful and practically feasible. Thesafeguarding functions of legally enforceable rights to participation ensuredemocratic instead of lobbying-like participation.Based on normative theoretical reflections on the democratic value of participation of civil society organisations as well as on empirical research in the fields of environmental policy (chemicals, REACH) and migration policy (familyreunification), this paper argues that the EU has not yet established an approach to participation that increases the democratic quality of EU policy-making but that it rather follows a voluntaristic and instrumental approach. Nevertheless, some developments in the environmental area give reason for cautious optimism that the EU might move towards a more democratic participatory regime of policy-making.

AB - Political science literature often claims that the participation of civil societyorganisations increases the democratic quality of policy-making in internationalgovernance arrangements. However, it remains unclear under what conditions such a democratic value can be achieved and how the empirical reality of this participation relates to the alleged democracy-enhancing quality. In recent years, the European initiatives to establish a civil dialogue, to improve the consultation with civil society organisations and above all the White Paper on European Governance have triggered some scientific expectations that the EU seeks to establish a participatory regime which possibly improves the democratic character of EU policy-making.The central hypothesis put forward in this paper is that the participation of civilsociety organisations is only then of democratic value if it takes place in anenvironment of clear rules; thus, an argument is made for a regulated model ofparticipation which is both normatively meaningful and practically feasible. Thesafeguarding functions of legally enforceable rights to participation ensuredemocratic instead of lobbying-like participation.Based on normative theoretical reflections on the democratic value of participation of civil society organisations as well as on empirical research in the fields of environmental policy (chemicals, REACH) and migration policy (familyreunification), this paper argues that the EU has not yet established an approach to participation that increases the democratic quality of EU policy-making but that it rather follows a voluntaristic and instrumental approach. Nevertheless, some developments in the environmental area give reason for cautious optimism that the EU might move towards a more democratic participatory regime of policy-making.

KW - Politics

KW - Europäische Demokratie

KW - Europäische Zivilgesellschaft

KW - Europäische Union / REACH-Verordnung

KW - Migration

KW - Partizipation

M3 - Working papers

T3 - RECON Online Working Paper

BT - Old wine in new bottles ?

PB - ARENA - Centre for European Studies

CY - Oslo

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Internationaler Personaleinsatz
  2. Buchhaltung und Jahresabschluss
  3. John Stuart Mill zur Einführung
  4. Der Kunde als Innovationsquelle
  5. Grundfragen ästhetischer Bildung
  6. Mining product configurator data
  7. § 66 Islamische Republik Pakistan
  8. Frauen in Unternehmensberatungen
  9. From Subjectivity to Objectivity
  10. Digitization and path disruption
  11. Strategisches Logistikmanagement
  12. From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics
  13. Marktorientierte Markenbewertung
  14. Partizipatives Regieren in der EU
  15. Im Schatten der Großen Koalition?
  16. Good Governance and Bad Neighbors?
  17. Rezension zu "The Lonesome Painter"
  18. Ein anderes land, eine andere stadt
  19. Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung
  20. § 61 Sozialistische Republik Vietnam
  21. Fernreisen als postkoloniales Reisen
  22. Noise level estimation and detection
  23. Close to, but still out of, government
  24. The Forgotten Function of Forgetting
  25. Hub, Fine-Tuner oder Business as Usual?
  26. Left parties in national governments
  27. Innovationsprozesse in Supply chains
  28. Bilanzierung von Leasingverhältnissen
  29. Governing Climate Change by Diffusion
  30. The transaction costs of eProcurement
  31. Warum die Regel von der Ausnahme lebt
  32. Arc spraying of WCFeCSiMn cored wires.
  33. Zensuren in der modernen Gesellschaft
  34. Die "Alte Heimatkunde" im Sachunterricht.
  35. Szenarien in der Unternehmensstrategie
  36. Marketing in der heutigen Gesellschaft
  37. Civil society in an integrating Europe
  38. TransPuG und Corporate Governance Kodex
  39. Optimale Instandhaltung in JIT-Prozessen
  40. Resistance to change at German Media AG
  41. Rezension zu "Ein Stuhl macht Geschichte"
  42. Machine vision system for UAV navigation
  43. Entrepreneurship and personal initiative