TY - JOUR

T1 - Offers in the Old Saxon Hêliand: Illocutionary Force, Recipient Agency, and Speech Representation.

AU - Concu, Valentina

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - This study examines offers in the Hêliand, an Old Saxon gospel harmony, using a combined form-to-function and function-to-form approach. Offers are also classified according to speech representation mode and role configuration to assess how recipient agency and illocutionary force are shaped in discourse. A key finding is that offers appear both in Direct Speech (DS) and in Narrative Representation of Speech Acts (NRSA), showing how the poem exploits different representational strategies to frame this speech act. In DS, offers generally retain their performative force and remain negotiable, even without real-time interaction, though some hybrid cases reduce this immediacy. In NRSA, by contrast, negotiability is reduced, with some instances highlighting deliberate refusal while others present acceptance or rejection as fixed outcomes. Within the Hêliand itself this attenuates their interactive quality, yet in comparison with the Diatessaron the same framing often sharpens volitional elements and foregrounds recipient responsibility more explicitly than its source. By representing religious devotion as an exchange requiring active acceptance, the Hêliand adapts not only lexicon but also pragmatic framing, making offers an additional tool for aligning Christian teaching with Saxon cultural models of lordship-based exchange of service and reward.

AB - This study examines offers in the Hêliand, an Old Saxon gospel harmony, using a combined form-to-function and function-to-form approach. Offers are also classified according to speech representation mode and role configuration to assess how recipient agency and illocutionary force are shaped in discourse. A key finding is that offers appear both in Direct Speech (DS) and in Narrative Representation of Speech Acts (NRSA), showing how the poem exploits different representational strategies to frame this speech act. In DS, offers generally retain their performative force and remain negotiable, even without real-time interaction, though some hybrid cases reduce this immediacy. In NRSA, by contrast, negotiability is reduced, with some instances highlighting deliberate refusal while others present acceptance or rejection as fixed outcomes. Within the Hêliand itself this attenuates their interactive quality, yet in comparison with the Diatessaron the same framing often sharpens volitional elements and foregrounds recipient responsibility more explicitly than its source. By representing religious devotion as an exchange requiring active acceptance, the Hêliand adapts not only lexicon but also pragmatic framing, making offers an additional tool for aligning Christian teaching with Saxon cultural models of lordship-based exchange of service and reward.

M3 - Journal articles

JO - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

SN - 1566-5852

ER -