Negative effects of forest gaps on dung removal in a full-factorial experiment

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Michael Staab
  • Rafael Achury
  • Christian Ammer
  • Martin Ehbrecht
  • Veronika Irmscher
  • Hendrik Mohr
  • Peter Schall
  • Wolfgang W. Weisser
  • Nico Blüthgen

Ecosystem functioning may directly or indirectly—via change in biodiversity—respond to land use. Dung removal is an important ecosystem function central for the decomposition of mammal faeces, including secondary seed dispersal and improved soil quality. Removal usually increases with dung beetle diversity and biomass. In forests, dung removal can vary with structural variables that are, however, often interrelated, making experiments necessary to understand the role of single variables on ecosystem functions. How gaps and deadwood, two main outcomes of forest management influence dung removal, is unknown. We tested if dung removal responds to gap creation and deadwood provisioning or if treatment effects are mediated via responses of dung beetles. We expected lower removal rates in gaps due to lower dung beetle biomass and diversity. We sampled dung beetles and measured dung removal in a highly-replicated full-factorial forest experiment established at 29 sites in three regions of Germany (treatments: Gap, Gap + Deadwood, Deadwood, Control). All gaps were experimentally created and had a diameter of around 30 m. Dung beetle diversity, biomass and dung removal were each lower in gaps than in controls. Dung removal decreased from 61.9% in controls to 48.5% in gaps, irrespective of whether or not the gap had deadwood. This treatment effect was primarily driven by dung beetle biomass but not diversity. Furthermore, dung removal was reduced to 56.9% in the deadwood treatment. Our findings are not consistent with complementarity effects of different dung beetle species linked to biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships that have been shown in several ecosystems. In contrast, identity effects can be pronounced: gaps reduced the abundance of a large-bodied key forest species (Anoplotrupes stercorosus), without compensatory recruitment of open land species. While gaps and deadwood are important for many forest organisms, dung beetles and dung removal respond negatively. Our results exemplify how experiments can contribute to test hypotheses on the interrelation between land use, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
Volume91
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)2113-2124
Number of pages12
ISSN0021-8790
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10.2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Spatial variation in human disturbances and their effects on forest structure and biodiversity across an Afromontane forest
  2. Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives
  3. myStudy
  4. Global decoupling of functional and phylogenetic diversity in plant communities
  5. Umweltrechtsschutz in China
  6. The Influence of Maximum Strength Performance in Seated Calf Raises on Counter Movement Jump and Squat Jump in Elite Junior Basketball Players
  7. Digital transformation in an incumbent organisation
  8. Three-dimensional microstructural analysis of Mg-Al-Zn alloys by synchrotron-radiation-based microtomography
  9. Ideological Stances in Yoruba Nation Secessionist Discourse in Nigerian Virtual Communities
  10. Sustainable engineering education in research and practice
  11. From the environmental state to the sustainability state? Conceptualization, indicators, and examples
  12. Am Grund des Anderen
  13. Collective intentionality in entrepreneurship-as-practice
  14. Space-focused stereotypes and their potential role in group-based disparities in social work services
  15. Revisited
  16. The classification systems of the EQ-5D, the HUI II and the SF-6D
  17. A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts
  18. Modern Micropolitics of Antipopulism
  19. The hidden power of language
  20. Variation revisited: A corpus analysis of offers in Irish English and British English
  21. Community-based Entrepreneurship and Rural Development
  22. On the microstructure of the German export boom: Evidence from establishment panel data, 1995-2002
  23. Mathematik 1
  24. Audit quality and materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting
  25. Communication management of start-ups: an empirical analysis of entrepreneurs’ communication and networking success on Facebook
  26. Früherkennung als Problem der Unternehmensführung in virtuellen Organisationen
  27. Specific SBR population behaviour as revealed by comparative dynamic simulation analysis of three full-scale municipal SBR wastewater treatment plants
  28. Gathering Voices, Feeling Relations
  29. The attenuating effect of mortality salience on dishonest behavior
  30. Activity-based start-up simulations in entrepreneurship education at the German universities
  31. Tree Species Traits but Not Diversity Mitigate Stem Breakage in a Subtropical Forest following a Rare and Extreme Ice Storm
  32. Identity affirmation and social movement support
  33. Top-down social modulation of perception-action coupling
  34. Lernkarten Bibelkunde
  35. Is Export Diversification good for Productivity? First Evidence for Manufacturing Enterprises in Germany
  36. Spatial characterization of coastal marine social-ecological systems
  37. Constructing The European Space Policy
  38. Implications of financial transaction costs on the real economy
  39. Reducing aquatic micropollutants – Increasing the focus on input prevention and integrated emission management
  40. “Normality” Revisited: Fieldwork and Family
  41. Anchoring and Sleep Inertia
  42. Continental-scale ecology versus landscape-scale case studies
  43. What do we know about Antibiotics in the Environment?
  44. Größen bauen auf Längen