Macht KI Rechtschreibkompetenzen überflüssig? Ein diskurslinguistischer Streifzug zum Status der Orthografie

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Macht KI Rechtschreibkompetenzen überflüssig? Ein diskurslinguistischer Streifzug zum Status der Orthografie. / Frick, Karina; Brommer, Sarah.
In: Aptum, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2025, p. 323–338.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e49896f0d9424b6ea8b4b7a3d2fbe108,
title = "Macht KI Rechtschreibkompetenzen {\"u}berfl{\"u}ssig? Ein diskurslinguistischer Streifzug zum Status der Orthografie",
abstract = "In times of changing writing habits, orthography, as an emotional asset and means of distinction, continues to be highly valued. In this paper, we present an explorative diachronic journey through 30 years of spelling discourse – from the reform to generative AI – and show that the positionings towards orthography remain relatively constant. Whereas the intensity of the discourse varies over time, depending on particular discursive events, both the actors and topoi turn out to be recurrent.",
keywords = "Sprachwissenschaften, Sprachkritik, Orthographie, KI, Diskurs",
author = "Karina Frick and Sarah Brommer",
year = "2025",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "21",
pages = "323–338",
journal = "Aptum",
issn = "1614-905X",
publisher = "Hempen",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macht KI Rechtschreibkompetenzen überflüssig? Ein diskurslinguistischer Streifzug zum Status der Orthografie

AU - Frick, Karina

AU - Brommer, Sarah

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - In times of changing writing habits, orthography, as an emotional asset and means of distinction, continues to be highly valued. In this paper, we present an explorative diachronic journey through 30 years of spelling discourse – from the reform to generative AI – and show that the positionings towards orthography remain relatively constant. Whereas the intensity of the discourse varies over time, depending on particular discursive events, both the actors and topoi turn out to be recurrent.

AB - In times of changing writing habits, orthography, as an emotional asset and means of distinction, continues to be highly valued. In this paper, we present an explorative diachronic journey through 30 years of spelling discourse – from the reform to generative AI – and show that the positionings towards orthography remain relatively constant. Whereas the intensity of the discourse varies over time, depending on particular discursive events, both the actors and topoi turn out to be recurrent.

KW - Sprachwissenschaften

KW - Sprachkritik

KW - Orthographie

KW - KI

KW - Diskurs

UR - https://buske.de/hbv_de/10-46771-9783691100150-5-4189

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

VL - 21

SP - 323

EP - 338

JO - Aptum

JF - Aptum

SN - 1614-905X

IS - 3

ER -