Less Populist in Power Online Communication of Populist Parties in Coalition Governments
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Government and Opposition, Vol. 57, No. 3, 10.07.2022, p. 467-489.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Less Populist in Power Online Communication of Populist Parties in Coalition Governments
AU - Schwörer, Jakob
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author, 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Government and Opposition Limited.
PY - 2022/7/10
Y1 - 2022/7/10
N2 - Recently several populist parties have become part of coalition governments in multiparty democracies, specifically in Western Europe. Based on the inclusion-moderation thesis, academics assume that incumbent populist parties tone down their populist rhetoric as a result of the daily businesses of deliberation and compromises in coalitions. However, while the assumption of tamed populists in power is widespread, there is little empirical work dealing with the topic. Using a classical quantitative content analysis of 1,210 Facebook posts published by populist parties in Italy, Spain, Austria and New Zealand, this article examines whether opposition parties are more populist and nativist than those in coalition governments. The findings indicate that populists do not decrease the degree of anti-elite and people-centred messages when they are in power but rather change the type of elites they attack and the antagonist groups they juxtapose. We should therefore rethink the validity of the inclusion-moderation thesis for populist parties in coalition governments.
AB - Recently several populist parties have become part of coalition governments in multiparty democracies, specifically in Western Europe. Based on the inclusion-moderation thesis, academics assume that incumbent populist parties tone down their populist rhetoric as a result of the daily businesses of deliberation and compromises in coalitions. However, while the assumption of tamed populists in power is widespread, there is little empirical work dealing with the topic. Using a classical quantitative content analysis of 1,210 Facebook posts published by populist parties in Italy, Spain, Austria and New Zealand, this article examines whether opposition parties are more populist and nativist than those in coalition governments. The findings indicate that populists do not decrease the degree of anti-elite and people-centred messages when they are in power but rather change the type of elites they attack and the antagonist groups they juxtapose. We should therefore rethink the validity of the inclusion-moderation thesis for populist parties in coalition governments.
KW - government
KW - inclusion-moderation
KW - nativism
KW - populism
KW - social media
KW - Politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102300678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/498d2632-4bf1-31f0-8fa7-36ccec2c2e16/
U2 - 10.1017/gov.2021.2
DO - 10.1017/gov.2021.2
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85102300678
VL - 57
SP - 467
EP - 489
JO - Government and Opposition
JF - Government and Opposition
SN - 0017-257X
IS - 3
ER -