Institutional logics and business models of digital niche marketplaces

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Institutional logics and business models of digital niche marketplaces. / Holzmann, Patrick; Gregori, Patrick; Bohn, Stephan et al.
In: Information and Organization, Vol. 35, No. 2, 100575, 06.2025.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Holzmann P, Gregori P, Bohn S, Reischauer G, Friederici N, Lehdonvirta V. Institutional logics and business models of digital niche marketplaces. Information and Organization. 2025 Jun;35(2):100575. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100575

Bibtex

@article{99e58b6c67514ec0a8fb080e75e3d267,
title = "Institutional logics and business models of digital niche marketplaces",
abstract = "While research on the business models of dominant digital marketplaces such as Amazon, TaskRabbit, and Uber has progressed in recent years, little is known about the business models of niche marketplaces despite their economic and social importance. Taking an institutional logic perspective, we examine how multiple logics shape the business models of digital niche marketplaces. Based on the comparative study of ten European digital niche marketplaces, we identify two business model archetypes that vary concerning problem complexity and the influence of institutional logics. The “concierge business model” is designed to efficiently solve simple location-bound problems through local networks. This model is dominantly shaped by the market logic and complemented by the corporate logic. By contrast, the “wizard business model” seeks innovative solutions to more complex problems by utilizing global networks. It is dominantly shaped by the professional logic and supplemented by the corporate and the market logic. Based on these insights, we develop a framework for the relationship between institutional logics and business models of digital niche marketplaces. Our study adds to research on the mechanisms and manifestations of institutional logics in business models and highlights the role of problem complexity, as well as contributing to better understand the distinctiveness of digital niche marketplaces.",
keywords = "Business model, Comparative case study, Digital marketplace, Institutional logics, Niche, Transaction platform, Management studies",
author = "Patrick Holzmann and Patrick Gregori and Stephan Bohn and Georg Reischauer and Nicolas Friederici and Vili Lehdonvirta",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024",
year = "2025",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100575",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
journal = "Information and Organization",
issn = "1471-7727",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional logics and business models of digital niche marketplaces

AU - Holzmann, Patrick

AU - Gregori, Patrick

AU - Bohn, Stephan

AU - Reischauer, Georg

AU - Friederici, Nicolas

AU - Lehdonvirta, Vili

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024

PY - 2025/6

Y1 - 2025/6

N2 - While research on the business models of dominant digital marketplaces such as Amazon, TaskRabbit, and Uber has progressed in recent years, little is known about the business models of niche marketplaces despite their economic and social importance. Taking an institutional logic perspective, we examine how multiple logics shape the business models of digital niche marketplaces. Based on the comparative study of ten European digital niche marketplaces, we identify two business model archetypes that vary concerning problem complexity and the influence of institutional logics. The “concierge business model” is designed to efficiently solve simple location-bound problems through local networks. This model is dominantly shaped by the market logic and complemented by the corporate logic. By contrast, the “wizard business model” seeks innovative solutions to more complex problems by utilizing global networks. It is dominantly shaped by the professional logic and supplemented by the corporate and the market logic. Based on these insights, we develop a framework for the relationship between institutional logics and business models of digital niche marketplaces. Our study adds to research on the mechanisms and manifestations of institutional logics in business models and highlights the role of problem complexity, as well as contributing to better understand the distinctiveness of digital niche marketplaces.

AB - While research on the business models of dominant digital marketplaces such as Amazon, TaskRabbit, and Uber has progressed in recent years, little is known about the business models of niche marketplaces despite their economic and social importance. Taking an institutional logic perspective, we examine how multiple logics shape the business models of digital niche marketplaces. Based on the comparative study of ten European digital niche marketplaces, we identify two business model archetypes that vary concerning problem complexity and the influence of institutional logics. The “concierge business model” is designed to efficiently solve simple location-bound problems through local networks. This model is dominantly shaped by the market logic and complemented by the corporate logic. By contrast, the “wizard business model” seeks innovative solutions to more complex problems by utilizing global networks. It is dominantly shaped by the professional logic and supplemented by the corporate and the market logic. Based on these insights, we develop a framework for the relationship between institutional logics and business models of digital niche marketplaces. Our study adds to research on the mechanisms and manifestations of institutional logics in business models and highlights the role of problem complexity, as well as contributing to better understand the distinctiveness of digital niche marketplaces.

KW - Business model

KW - Comparative case study

KW - Digital marketplace

KW - Institutional logics

KW - Niche

KW - Transaction platform

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006762751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100575

DO - 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100575

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 35

JO - Information and Organization

JF - Information and Organization

SN - 1471-7727

IS - 2

M1 - 100575

ER -

Recently viewed