Inequality Regimes in Coworking Spaces: How New Forms of Organising (Re)produce Inequalities
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Work, Employment and Society, 21.03.2024.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Inequality Regimes in Coworking Spaces
T2 - How New Forms of Organising (Re)produce Inequalities
AU - Cnossen, Boukje
AU - Knappert, Lena
AU - Ortlieb, Renate
N1 - Funding Information: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was partly supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) [grant number 407-12-008]. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/3/21
Y1 - 2024/3/21
N2 - Coworking is a rapidly growing worldwide phenomenon. While the coworking movement emphasises equality and emancipation, there is little known about the extent to which coworking spaces as new forms of organising live up to this ideal. This study examines inequality in coworking spaces in the Netherlands, employing Acker’s framework of inequality regimes. The findings highlight coworking-specific components of inequality regimes, in particular stereotyped assumptions regarding ‘ideal members’ that establish the bases of inequality, practices that produce inequality (e.g. through the commodification of community) and practices that perpetuate inequality (e.g. the denial of inequality). The study provides an update of Acker’s framework in the context of coworking and speaks, more broadly, to the growing body of literature on (in)equality in emerging organisational contexts.
AB - Coworking is a rapidly growing worldwide phenomenon. While the coworking movement emphasises equality and emancipation, there is little known about the extent to which coworking spaces as new forms of organising live up to this ideal. This study examines inequality in coworking spaces in the Netherlands, employing Acker’s framework of inequality regimes. The findings highlight coworking-specific components of inequality regimes, in particular stereotyped assumptions regarding ‘ideal members’ that establish the bases of inequality, practices that produce inequality (e.g. through the commodification of community) and practices that perpetuate inequality (e.g. the denial of inequality). The study provides an update of Acker’s framework in the context of coworking and speaks, more broadly, to the growing body of literature on (in)equality in emerging organisational contexts.
KW - coworking spaces
KW - inequality regimes
KW - new forms of organising
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188306734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/b88336bd-dbb6-3984-8d08-785e35668283/
U2 - 10.1177/09500170241237188
DO - 10.1177/09500170241237188
M3 - Journal articles
JO - Work, Employment and Society
JF - Work, Employment and Society
SN - 0950-0170
ER -