Implicit processes in moral decision making: Why milliseconds matter

Research output: Journal contributionsConference abstract in journalResearch

Standard

Implicit processes in moral decision making: Why milliseconds matter. / Marquardt, Nicki; Höger, Rainer; Roidl, Ernst.
In: International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 3-4, 01.06.2008, p. 744.

Research output: Journal contributionsConference abstract in journalResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{216a00c0a664406eb2385313e04c9c1c,
title = "Implicit processes in moral decision making: Why milliseconds matter",
abstract = "The present study examines the relationship between implicit mental processes and moral decisions in business. Based on the dual‐process view in implicit social cognition, it is argued that moral judgments can rely on two different modes of information processing (implicit vs. explicit processes). In order to test this assumption, several experiments were conducted. The participants were supposed to work on a complex ethical decision‐making task. Implicit processes were assessed with latency‐based measures (e.g. Implicit Association Test, Eye‐Tracking). Different questionnaires were used to diagnose explicit judgmental processes. The results show that latency‐based measures are a good predictor for moral decision making.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Nicki Marquardt and Rainer H{\"o}ger and Ernst Roidl",
note = "Document Type: Meeting Abstract ",
year = "2008",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00207594.2008.10108487",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "744",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0020-7594",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3-4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit processes in moral decision making: Why milliseconds matter

AU - Marquardt, Nicki

AU - Höger, Rainer

AU - Roidl, Ernst

N1 - Document Type: Meeting Abstract

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - The present study examines the relationship between implicit mental processes and moral decisions in business. Based on the dual‐process view in implicit social cognition, it is argued that moral judgments can rely on two different modes of information processing (implicit vs. explicit processes). In order to test this assumption, several experiments were conducted. The participants were supposed to work on a complex ethical decision‐making task. Implicit processes were assessed with latency‐based measures (e.g. Implicit Association Test, Eye‐Tracking). Different questionnaires were used to diagnose explicit judgmental processes. The results show that latency‐based measures are a good predictor for moral decision making.

AB - The present study examines the relationship between implicit mental processes and moral decisions in business. Based on the dual‐process view in implicit social cognition, it is argued that moral judgments can rely on two different modes of information processing (implicit vs. explicit processes). In order to test this assumption, several experiments were conducted. The participants were supposed to work on a complex ethical decision‐making task. Implicit processes were assessed with latency‐based measures (e.g. Implicit Association Test, Eye‐Tracking). Different questionnaires were used to diagnose explicit judgmental processes. The results show that latency‐based measures are a good predictor for moral decision making.

KW - Business psychology

U2 - 10.1080/00207594.2008.10108487

DO - 10.1080/00207594.2008.10108487

M3 - Conference abstract in journal

VL - 43

SP - 744

JO - International Journal of Psychology

JF - International Journal of Psychology

SN - 0020-7594

IS - 3-4

ER -