Hybrid Regionalism in Africa Towards a Theory of African Union Interventions
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: African and Asian Studies, Vol. 22, No. 1-2, 2023, p. 39-62.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid Regionalism in Africa Towards a Theory of African Union Interventions
AU - Krösche, Niklas
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Niklas Krösche, 2023 |
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Since its establishment, the African Union (AU) takes on an active role in regional security matters through different types of interventions. These interventions, however, remain undertheorized. This paper argues that African hybrid regionalism, which combines problem-solving and regime-serving logics of cooperation, shapes the AU's intervention practice in specific ways. To this end, I first theorize how the parallel presence of these logics shapes AU interventions before probing the empirical validity by studying coercive interventions undertaken by the AU Peace and Security Council (PSC) between 2005 and 2021. For this purpose, I employ methods of content analysis to systematically code all publicly available meeting documents issued by the PSC. The results demonstrate that the AU strives to prevent and manage crises through interventions but does so in ways that protect or promote incumbent regimes, either by producing direct benefits for them or, when their actions contribute to the crisis, by avoiding head-on confrontations. This suggests careful balancing of the two main impetuses in African security regionalism, namely solving transnational problems and serving the interests of incumbents.
AB - Since its establishment, the African Union (AU) takes on an active role in regional security matters through different types of interventions. These interventions, however, remain undertheorized. This paper argues that African hybrid regionalism, which combines problem-solving and regime-serving logics of cooperation, shapes the AU's intervention practice in specific ways. To this end, I first theorize how the parallel presence of these logics shapes AU interventions before probing the empirical validity by studying coercive interventions undertaken by the AU Peace and Security Council (PSC) between 2005 and 2021. For this purpose, I employ methods of content analysis to systematically code all publicly available meeting documents issued by the PSC. The results demonstrate that the AU strives to prevent and manage crises through interventions but does so in ways that protect or promote incumbent regimes, either by producing direct benefits for them or, when their actions contribute to the crisis, by avoiding head-on confrontations. This suggests careful balancing of the two main impetuses in African security regionalism, namely solving transnational problems and serving the interests of incumbents.
KW - African Union
KW - hybrid regionalism
KW - interventions
KW - problem-solving
KW - regime-serving
KW - Politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150426436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/34c668b5-81ef-3273-8ea2-d4f6f37cbf59/
U2 - 10.1163/15692108-12341580
DO - 10.1163/15692108-12341580
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85150426436
VL - 22
SP - 39
EP - 62
JO - African and Asian Studies
JF - African and Asian Studies
SN - 1569-2094
IS - 1-2
ER -