How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksArticle in conference proceedingsResearch

Standard

How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector. / Laurin, L.; Möller, Andreas; Prox, Martina et al.
Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment - Conference Record. IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2006. p. 272-275 1650075 (IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksArticle in conference proceedingsResearch

Harvard

Laurin, L, Möller, A, Prox, M & Schmidt, M 2006, How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector. in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment - Conference Record., 1650075, IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 272-275, International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, United States, 08.05.06. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650075

APA

Laurin, L., Möller, A., Prox, M., & Schmidt, M. (2006). How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment - Conference Record (pp. 272-275). Article 1650075 (IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment). IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650075

Vancouver

Laurin L, Möller A, Prox M, Schmidt M. How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment - Conference Record. IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2006. p. 272-275. 1650075. (IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment). doi: 10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650075

Bibtex

@inbook{3c22356834ca44219e0dcdae916491e3,
title = "How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector",
abstract = "The question surrounding {"}greener{"} products has always been, {"}at what cost?{"} Several decades ago, it was assumed that the product that was easier on the environment would cost more to produce, yet would not command a higher price. Regulations, such as the European WEEE directive, and emissions trading are ways in which governments have changed the market paradigm, rewarding lower polluting manufacturers. With complex issues at stake within a production system, it becomes more difficult to measure the trade-offs between environmental benefit and economics. A modern approach in production theory of business and management economics enables this complex calculation by valuing everything in the system. This approach proposes that objects (e.g. materials) are defined as good, bad, or neutral. In transformation processes in production or recycling systems this makes it possible to distinguish stringently between the economic revenue of a process and the economic and ecological expenditures for it. Materials and energy classified as good are considered as an expense if they are used by the system and a product or revenue, if they are created by the system. This approach can be transferred to entire systems of processes in order to determine the system revenue and the system expenditure. The process can be more easily understood using material flow networks or graphs. In complex material flow systems, it becomes possible to calculate not only the costs, but also the direct and indirect environmental impacts of an individual process or system revenue (for example a product or the elimination of waste) consistently. The approach permits a stringent analysis as well as different analysis perspectives of a material and energy flow system. It is particularly suitable for closed-loop economic systems in which material backflows occur. This paper outlines how this approach can be employed in the field of e-waste management",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, E-waste management, Life cycle assessment, Material flow nets, MFA, Production theory",
author = "L. Laurin and Andreas M{\"o}ller and Martina Prox and Mario Schmidt",
year = "2006",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650075",
language = "English",
isbn = "1424403510",
series = "IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment",
publisher = "IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
pages = "272--275",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment - Conference Record",
address = "United States",
note = "International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, IEEE ; Conference date: 08-05-2006 Through 11-05-2006",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector

AU - Laurin, L.

AU - Möller, Andreas

AU - Prox, Martina

AU - Schmidt, Mario

N1 - Conference code: 14

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - The question surrounding "greener" products has always been, "at what cost?" Several decades ago, it was assumed that the product that was easier on the environment would cost more to produce, yet would not command a higher price. Regulations, such as the European WEEE directive, and emissions trading are ways in which governments have changed the market paradigm, rewarding lower polluting manufacturers. With complex issues at stake within a production system, it becomes more difficult to measure the trade-offs between environmental benefit and economics. A modern approach in production theory of business and management economics enables this complex calculation by valuing everything in the system. This approach proposes that objects (e.g. materials) are defined as good, bad, or neutral. In transformation processes in production or recycling systems this makes it possible to distinguish stringently between the economic revenue of a process and the economic and ecological expenditures for it. Materials and energy classified as good are considered as an expense if they are used by the system and a product or revenue, if they are created by the system. This approach can be transferred to entire systems of processes in order to determine the system revenue and the system expenditure. The process can be more easily understood using material flow networks or graphs. In complex material flow systems, it becomes possible to calculate not only the costs, but also the direct and indirect environmental impacts of an individual process or system revenue (for example a product or the elimination of waste) consistently. The approach permits a stringent analysis as well as different analysis perspectives of a material and energy flow system. It is particularly suitable for closed-loop economic systems in which material backflows occur. This paper outlines how this approach can be employed in the field of e-waste management

AB - The question surrounding "greener" products has always been, "at what cost?" Several decades ago, it was assumed that the product that was easier on the environment would cost more to produce, yet would not command a higher price. Regulations, such as the European WEEE directive, and emissions trading are ways in which governments have changed the market paradigm, rewarding lower polluting manufacturers. With complex issues at stake within a production system, it becomes more difficult to measure the trade-offs between environmental benefit and economics. A modern approach in production theory of business and management economics enables this complex calculation by valuing everything in the system. This approach proposes that objects (e.g. materials) are defined as good, bad, or neutral. In transformation processes in production or recycling systems this makes it possible to distinguish stringently between the economic revenue of a process and the economic and ecological expenditures for it. Materials and energy classified as good are considered as an expense if they are used by the system and a product or revenue, if they are created by the system. This approach can be transferred to entire systems of processes in order to determine the system revenue and the system expenditure. The process can be more easily understood using material flow networks or graphs. In complex material flow systems, it becomes possible to calculate not only the costs, but also the direct and indirect environmental impacts of an individual process or system revenue (for example a product or the elimination of waste) consistently. The approach permits a stringent analysis as well as different analysis perspectives of a material and energy flow system. It is particularly suitable for closed-loop economic systems in which material backflows occur. This paper outlines how this approach can be employed in the field of e-waste management

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - E-waste management

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Material flow nets

KW - MFA

KW - Production theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845587578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/98961e30-5c15-3fdc-acb8-e9992e6a7c2c/

U2 - 10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650075

DO - 10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650075

M3 - Article in conference proceedings

SN - 1424403510

SN - 9781424403516

T3 - IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment

SP - 272

EP - 275

BT - Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment - Conference Record

PB - IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment

Y2 - 8 May 2006 through 11 May 2006

ER -