From Phenomenological Self-Givenness to the Notion of Spiritual Freedom
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: PhaenEx: journal of existential and phenomenological theory and culture, Vol. 13, No. 2, 02.04.2020, p. 38-51.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - From Phenomenological Self-Givenness to the Notion of Spiritual Freedom
AU - Hennigfeld, Iris
PY - 2020/4/2
Y1 - 2020/4/2
N2 - In my paper, I want to focus not only on the notions of givenness and evidence in Husserl’s phenomenology, but also on phenomenological work “after” Husserl. I will elaborate on how these phenomenological key ideas can methodologically be made fruitful, especially for an investigation into religious phenomena. After giving an outline of Husserl’s notions of (self-)givenness, evidence, and original intuition (I), I want to portray key elements of Steinbock’s discovery of a generative dimension in Husserl’s phenomenology and show how this approach correlates to the field of religious experiences (II). Subsequently, I want to focus on Steinbock’s book Phenomenology of Mysticism: The Verticality of Religious Experience (2007), and elucidate how for Steinbock different historical examples of mystical experiences can serve as leading clues for the revelation of the essential, eidetic structures of “vertical experiences”—or, phenomenologically speaking, the eidos of religious experience, which turns out to be “epiphany” (III). The expression “verticality,” as opposed to “horizontality,” denotes the existential and dynamic dimension of experiences which are oriented toward a new height (religiously or morally) “beyond” ourselves.
AB - In my paper, I want to focus not only on the notions of givenness and evidence in Husserl’s phenomenology, but also on phenomenological work “after” Husserl. I will elaborate on how these phenomenological key ideas can methodologically be made fruitful, especially for an investigation into religious phenomena. After giving an outline of Husserl’s notions of (self-)givenness, evidence, and original intuition (I), I want to portray key elements of Steinbock’s discovery of a generative dimension in Husserl’s phenomenology and show how this approach correlates to the field of religious experiences (II). Subsequently, I want to focus on Steinbock’s book Phenomenology of Mysticism: The Verticality of Religious Experience (2007), and elucidate how for Steinbock different historical examples of mystical experiences can serve as leading clues for the revelation of the essential, eidetic structures of “vertical experiences”—or, phenomenologically speaking, the eidos of religious experience, which turns out to be “epiphany” (III). The expression “verticality,” as opposed to “horizontality,” denotes the existential and dynamic dimension of experiences which are oriented toward a new height (religiously or morally) “beyond” ourselves.
KW - Philosophy
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000523586700004
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/70331bd8-2597-3b07-a446-432149916f6d/
U2 - 10.22329/p.v13i2.6217
DO - 10.22329/p.v13i2.6217
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 13
SP - 38
EP - 51
JO - PhaenEx: journal of existential and phenomenological theory and culture
JF - PhaenEx: journal of existential and phenomenological theory and culture
SN - 1911-1576
IS - 2
ER -