Failure as a Process: Shaping What is Worth Doing in Creative Projects

Research output: Journal contributionsComments / Debate / ReportsResearch

Standard

Failure as a Process: Shaping What is Worth Doing in Creative Projects. / Otto, Birke D.; Schiemer, Benjamin; Sminia, Harry et al.
In: Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 91, No. 1, 2025.

Research output: Journal contributionsComments / Debate / ReportsResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Otto BD, Schiemer B, Sminia H, Sydow J. Failure as a Process: Shaping What is Worth Doing in Creative Projects. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. 2025;91(1). doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X20250000091020

Bibtex

@article{282db0cd7e824c6aa2b10f3ac71041d7,
title = "Failure as a Process: Shaping What is Worth Doing in Creative Projects",
abstract = "Abstract – Failure is commonly conceived either as a provisional state or as the unwelcome endpoint of a process. In both scenarios, failure occurs when there is a discrepancy between an expectation and a result, presupposing a well-defined comprehension of intentions and anticipated outcomes. This assumption is particularly challenged when conferred to creative projects, where expectations are not always as explicitly defined and undergo frequent changes. To understand how failure evolves, this study analyzes failure experiences of individuals working on creative projects in the arts and sciences and investigates how shifts in expectations occur with setbacks experienced. We develop three interconnected dimensions of expectation in creative projects: uniqueness, do-ability, and resonance. Together, these create a malleable evaluative space within which a creative project is deemed worthwhile doing. Our findings suggest that disappointed expectations are met by either prioritizing certain expectations over others, or by realigning expectations with new opportunities, and in so doing shape and change the relative importance or meaning of these expectations. We argue that these responses transform the evaluative space in a way that keeps the creative project going. An endpoint failure only occurs when those involved in a creative project run out of possibilities to alter the evaluative space. Our study overcomes the binary conception of failure as being merely the opposite of success and demonstrates that success in creative projects is not always output orientated. It also involves creating and maintaining sustainable ways to continue.",
keywords = "Creative projects, evaluative spaces, expectations, failure, ideas, temporary organization",
author = "Otto, {Birke D.} and Benjamin Schiemer and Harry Sminia and J{\"o}rg Sydow",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 Birke D. Otto, Benjamin Schiemer, Harry Sminia and J{\"o}rg Sydow",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1108/S0733-558X20250000091020",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
journal = "Research in the Sociology of Organizations",
issn = "0733-558X",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure as a Process

T2 - Shaping What is Worth Doing in Creative Projects

AU - Otto, Birke D.

AU - Schiemer, Benjamin

AU - Sminia, Harry

AU - Sydow, Jörg

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 Birke D. Otto, Benjamin Schiemer, Harry Sminia and Jörg Sydow

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Abstract – Failure is commonly conceived either as a provisional state or as the unwelcome endpoint of a process. In both scenarios, failure occurs when there is a discrepancy between an expectation and a result, presupposing a well-defined comprehension of intentions and anticipated outcomes. This assumption is particularly challenged when conferred to creative projects, where expectations are not always as explicitly defined and undergo frequent changes. To understand how failure evolves, this study analyzes failure experiences of individuals working on creative projects in the arts and sciences and investigates how shifts in expectations occur with setbacks experienced. We develop three interconnected dimensions of expectation in creative projects: uniqueness, do-ability, and resonance. Together, these create a malleable evaluative space within which a creative project is deemed worthwhile doing. Our findings suggest that disappointed expectations are met by either prioritizing certain expectations over others, or by realigning expectations with new opportunities, and in so doing shape and change the relative importance or meaning of these expectations. We argue that these responses transform the evaluative space in a way that keeps the creative project going. An endpoint failure only occurs when those involved in a creative project run out of possibilities to alter the evaluative space. Our study overcomes the binary conception of failure as being merely the opposite of success and demonstrates that success in creative projects is not always output orientated. It also involves creating and maintaining sustainable ways to continue.

AB - Abstract – Failure is commonly conceived either as a provisional state or as the unwelcome endpoint of a process. In both scenarios, failure occurs when there is a discrepancy between an expectation and a result, presupposing a well-defined comprehension of intentions and anticipated outcomes. This assumption is particularly challenged when conferred to creative projects, where expectations are not always as explicitly defined and undergo frequent changes. To understand how failure evolves, this study analyzes failure experiences of individuals working on creative projects in the arts and sciences and investigates how shifts in expectations occur with setbacks experienced. We develop three interconnected dimensions of expectation in creative projects: uniqueness, do-ability, and resonance. Together, these create a malleable evaluative space within which a creative project is deemed worthwhile doing. Our findings suggest that disappointed expectations are met by either prioritizing certain expectations over others, or by realigning expectations with new opportunities, and in so doing shape and change the relative importance or meaning of these expectations. We argue that these responses transform the evaluative space in a way that keeps the creative project going. An endpoint failure only occurs when those involved in a creative project run out of possibilities to alter the evaluative space. Our study overcomes the binary conception of failure as being merely the opposite of success and demonstrates that success in creative projects is not always output orientated. It also involves creating and maintaining sustainable ways to continue.

KW - Creative projects

KW - evaluative spaces

KW - expectations

KW - failure

KW - ideas

KW - temporary organization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105017033601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S0733-558X20250000091020

DO - 10.1108/S0733-558X20250000091020

M3 - Comments / Debate / Reports

AN - SCOPUS:105017033601

VL - 91

JO - Research in the Sociology of Organizations

JF - Research in the Sociology of Organizations

SN - 0733-558X

IS - 1

ER -