Effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing recurrence of depressive disorder: Meta-analysis and meta-regression

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing recurrence of depressive disorder: Meta-analysis and meta-regression. / Biesheuvel-Leliefeld, Karolien E M; Kok, Gemma D.; Bockting, Claudi L H et al.
In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 174, 15.03.2015, p. 400-410.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Biesheuvel-Leliefeld, KEM, Kok, GD, Bockting, CLH, Cuijpers, P, Hollon, SD, Van Marwijk, HWJ & Smit, F 2015, 'Effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing recurrence of depressive disorder: Meta-analysis and meta-regression', Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 174, pp. 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.016

APA

Biesheuvel-Leliefeld, K. E. M., Kok, G. D., Bockting, C. L. H., Cuijpers, P., Hollon, S. D., Van Marwijk, H. W. J., & Smit, F. (2015). Effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing recurrence of depressive disorder: Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.016

Vancouver

Biesheuvel-Leliefeld KEM, Kok GD, Bockting CLH, Cuijpers P, Hollon SD, Van Marwijk HWJ et al. Effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing recurrence of depressive disorder: Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015 Mar 15;174:400-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.016

Bibtex

@article{dcd2b903ce3a488bb3c1c3c60597139e,
title = "Effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing recurrence of depressive disorder: Meta-analysis and meta-regression",
abstract = "Methods We systematically reviewed the pertinent trial literature until May 2014. The random-effects model was used to compute the pooled relative risk of relapse or recurrence (RR). A distinction was made between two comparator conditions: (1) treatment-as-usual and (2) the use of antidepressants. Other sources of heterogeneity in the data were explored using meta-regression.Background Major depression is probably best seen as a chronically recurrent disorder, with patients experiencing another depressive episode after remission. Therefore, attention to reduce the risk of relapse or recurrence after remission is warranted. The aim of this review is to meta-analytically examine the effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce relapse or recurrence rates of depressive disorder.Results Twenty-five randomised trials met inclusion criteria. Preventive psychological interventions were significantly better than treatment-as-usual in reducing the risk of relapse or recurrence (RR=0.64, 95% CI=0.53-0.76, z=4.89, p<0.001, NNT=5) and also more successful than antidepressants (RR=0.83, 95% CI=0.70-0.97, z=2.40, p=0.017, NNT=13). Meta-regression showed homogeneity in effect size across a range of study, population and intervention characteristics, but the preventive effect of psychological intervention was usually better when the prevention was preceded by treatment in the acute phase (b=-1.94, SEb=0.68, z=-2.84, p=0.005).Limitations Differences between the primary studies in methodological design, composition of the patient groups and type of intervention may have caused heterogeneity in the data, but could not be evaluated in a meta-regression owing to poor reporting.Conclusions We conclude that there is supporting evidence that preventive psychological interventions reduce the risk of relapse or recurrence in major depression.",
keywords = "Health sciences, Major depressive disorder, Meta-analysis, Prevention, Psychotherapy, Recurrence, Relapse",
author = "Biesheuvel-Leliefeld, {Karolien E M} and Kok, {Gemma D.} and Bockting, {Claudi L H} and Pim Cuijpers and Hollon, {Steven D.} and {Van Marwijk}, {Harm W J} and Filip Smit",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.016",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
pages = "400--410",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing recurrence of depressive disorder

T2 - Meta-analysis and meta-regression

AU - Biesheuvel-Leliefeld, Karolien E M

AU - Kok, Gemma D.

AU - Bockting, Claudi L H

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Hollon, Steven D.

AU - Van Marwijk, Harm W J

AU - Smit, Filip

PY - 2015/3/15

Y1 - 2015/3/15

N2 - Methods We systematically reviewed the pertinent trial literature until May 2014. The random-effects model was used to compute the pooled relative risk of relapse or recurrence (RR). A distinction was made between two comparator conditions: (1) treatment-as-usual and (2) the use of antidepressants. Other sources of heterogeneity in the data were explored using meta-regression.Background Major depression is probably best seen as a chronically recurrent disorder, with patients experiencing another depressive episode after remission. Therefore, attention to reduce the risk of relapse or recurrence after remission is warranted. The aim of this review is to meta-analytically examine the effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce relapse or recurrence rates of depressive disorder.Results Twenty-five randomised trials met inclusion criteria. Preventive psychological interventions were significantly better than treatment-as-usual in reducing the risk of relapse or recurrence (RR=0.64, 95% CI=0.53-0.76, z=4.89, p<0.001, NNT=5) and also more successful than antidepressants (RR=0.83, 95% CI=0.70-0.97, z=2.40, p=0.017, NNT=13). Meta-regression showed homogeneity in effect size across a range of study, population and intervention characteristics, but the preventive effect of psychological intervention was usually better when the prevention was preceded by treatment in the acute phase (b=-1.94, SEb=0.68, z=-2.84, p=0.005).Limitations Differences between the primary studies in methodological design, composition of the patient groups and type of intervention may have caused heterogeneity in the data, but could not be evaluated in a meta-regression owing to poor reporting.Conclusions We conclude that there is supporting evidence that preventive psychological interventions reduce the risk of relapse or recurrence in major depression.

AB - Methods We systematically reviewed the pertinent trial literature until May 2014. The random-effects model was used to compute the pooled relative risk of relapse or recurrence (RR). A distinction was made between two comparator conditions: (1) treatment-as-usual and (2) the use of antidepressants. Other sources of heterogeneity in the data were explored using meta-regression.Background Major depression is probably best seen as a chronically recurrent disorder, with patients experiencing another depressive episode after remission. Therefore, attention to reduce the risk of relapse or recurrence after remission is warranted. The aim of this review is to meta-analytically examine the effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce relapse or recurrence rates of depressive disorder.Results Twenty-five randomised trials met inclusion criteria. Preventive psychological interventions were significantly better than treatment-as-usual in reducing the risk of relapse or recurrence (RR=0.64, 95% CI=0.53-0.76, z=4.89, p<0.001, NNT=5) and also more successful than antidepressants (RR=0.83, 95% CI=0.70-0.97, z=2.40, p=0.017, NNT=13). Meta-regression showed homogeneity in effect size across a range of study, population and intervention characteristics, but the preventive effect of psychological intervention was usually better when the prevention was preceded by treatment in the acute phase (b=-1.94, SEb=0.68, z=-2.84, p=0.005).Limitations Differences between the primary studies in methodological design, composition of the patient groups and type of intervention may have caused heterogeneity in the data, but could not be evaluated in a meta-regression owing to poor reporting.Conclusions We conclude that there is supporting evidence that preventive psychological interventions reduce the risk of relapse or recurrence in major depression.

KW - Health sciences

KW - Major depressive disorder

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Prevention

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - Recurrence

KW - Relapse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920177798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.016

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 25553400

AN - SCOPUS:84920177798

VL - 174

SP - 400

EP - 410

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -