Ecosystem Services Justice: The Emergence of a Critical Research Field

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ecosystem Services Justice: The Emergence of a Critical Research Field. / Langemeyer, Johannes; Benra, Felipe; Nahuelhual, Laura et al.
In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 69, 101655, 01.10.2024.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Langemeyer J, Benra F, Nahuelhual L, Zoderer BM. Ecosystem Services Justice: The Emergence of a Critical Research Field. Ecosystem Services. 2024 Oct 1;69:101655. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101655

Bibtex

@article{d04602ccf50a4443b1ebf0c0d4512cc6,
title = "Ecosystem Services Justice: The Emergence of a Critical Research Field",
abstract = "Ecosystem services justice is an emergent research field. Over the past decade, research on ecosystem services has increasingly developed a justice perspective and incorporated it into its conceptual and empirical frameworks. This perspective aims at providing a review of the emergent strands of research addressing ecosystem services justice, and at creating an outlook on future research needs and frontiers. The review departs from central critiques to the ecosystem service approach, which have been foundational for the research field of ecosystem services justice. To be precise, we address three different research strands on which justice issues arise. First, ecosystem services production, considering the (increasing) commodification of ecosystem services, the concentration of ecosystem services production assets and the role of trade-offs in production capacities. Second, the distribution of ecosystem services benefits under the aspects of unequal vulnerabilities, the consideration of accessibility and individual's capabilities to obtain ecosystem services. Third, the recognition of ecosystem services pluralisms, including socially differentiated forms of wellbeing, plural values and knowledge concerning ecosystem services. While ES justice has strongly advanced from a scientific perspective, we are still lacking a stronger reflection of these advances in practice. Future research, we argue, needs to develop holistic procedural frameworks for integrating the complexity of ecosystem services justice, addressing the ecosystem services production under consideration of historic inequalities, the distribution of ecosystem services benefits with respect to people's diverse needs, vulnerabilities, and capabilities, as well as diverse wellbeing-, value-, and knowledge-systems. The social-ecological understanding of ecosystem services co-production, which recognizes the dynamic and reciprocal relationship between humans and ecosystems, is identified as a crucial framing for this endeavor.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research",
author = "Johannes Langemeyer and Felipe Benra and Laura Nahuelhual and Zoderer, {Brenda Maria}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101655",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecosystem Services Justice

T2 - The Emergence of a Critical Research Field

AU - Langemeyer, Johannes

AU - Benra, Felipe

AU - Nahuelhual, Laura

AU - Zoderer, Brenda Maria

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

PY - 2024/10/1

Y1 - 2024/10/1

N2 - Ecosystem services justice is an emergent research field. Over the past decade, research on ecosystem services has increasingly developed a justice perspective and incorporated it into its conceptual and empirical frameworks. This perspective aims at providing a review of the emergent strands of research addressing ecosystem services justice, and at creating an outlook on future research needs and frontiers. The review departs from central critiques to the ecosystem service approach, which have been foundational for the research field of ecosystem services justice. To be precise, we address three different research strands on which justice issues arise. First, ecosystem services production, considering the (increasing) commodification of ecosystem services, the concentration of ecosystem services production assets and the role of trade-offs in production capacities. Second, the distribution of ecosystem services benefits under the aspects of unequal vulnerabilities, the consideration of accessibility and individual's capabilities to obtain ecosystem services. Third, the recognition of ecosystem services pluralisms, including socially differentiated forms of wellbeing, plural values and knowledge concerning ecosystem services. While ES justice has strongly advanced from a scientific perspective, we are still lacking a stronger reflection of these advances in practice. Future research, we argue, needs to develop holistic procedural frameworks for integrating the complexity of ecosystem services justice, addressing the ecosystem services production under consideration of historic inequalities, the distribution of ecosystem services benefits with respect to people's diverse needs, vulnerabilities, and capabilities, as well as diverse wellbeing-, value-, and knowledge-systems. The social-ecological understanding of ecosystem services co-production, which recognizes the dynamic and reciprocal relationship between humans and ecosystems, is identified as a crucial framing for this endeavor.

AB - Ecosystem services justice is an emergent research field. Over the past decade, research on ecosystem services has increasingly developed a justice perspective and incorporated it into its conceptual and empirical frameworks. This perspective aims at providing a review of the emergent strands of research addressing ecosystem services justice, and at creating an outlook on future research needs and frontiers. The review departs from central critiques to the ecosystem service approach, which have been foundational for the research field of ecosystem services justice. To be precise, we address three different research strands on which justice issues arise. First, ecosystem services production, considering the (increasing) commodification of ecosystem services, the concentration of ecosystem services production assets and the role of trade-offs in production capacities. Second, the distribution of ecosystem services benefits under the aspects of unequal vulnerabilities, the consideration of accessibility and individual's capabilities to obtain ecosystem services. Third, the recognition of ecosystem services pluralisms, including socially differentiated forms of wellbeing, plural values and knowledge concerning ecosystem services. While ES justice has strongly advanced from a scientific perspective, we are still lacking a stronger reflection of these advances in practice. Future research, we argue, needs to develop holistic procedural frameworks for integrating the complexity of ecosystem services justice, addressing the ecosystem services production under consideration of historic inequalities, the distribution of ecosystem services benefits with respect to people's diverse needs, vulnerabilities, and capabilities, as well as diverse wellbeing-, value-, and knowledge-systems. The social-ecological understanding of ecosystem services co-production, which recognizes the dynamic and reciprocal relationship between humans and ecosystems, is identified as a crucial framing for this endeavor.

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202045536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/39887231-7f38-3e3b-8a6b-50bb7c1c3a1e/

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101655

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101655

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85202045536

VL - 69

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 101655

ER -