Economic/ecological tradeoffs among ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 93, 09.2013, p. 116-127.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic/ecological tradeoffs among ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation
AU - Hussain, Abul Maala Tanvir
AU - Tschirhart, John
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - An integrated economic/ecological model is built to address tradeoffs betweenbiodiversity conservation and two marketable rangeland ecosystem services: cattle grazing and elk hunting. The ecology is represented by an eleven species food web in which individual optimizing plants and animals engage in competitive and predator/prey relationships. The ecological model defines a steady-state set of sustainable grazing and hunting options, and for each option biodiversity is measured using an index defined over the eleven species. In linking the ecology to the economics, social welfare depends on grazing profits and hunter net benefits. The problem can be stated as maximizing economic welfare over two ecosystem services, subject to their sustainable use and subject to a target level of biodiversity. A numerical application with economic and biological data from the Western United States is used to determine sustainable grazing and hunting options for alternative biodiversity levels, and to select the option that maximizes welfare.
AB - An integrated economic/ecological model is built to address tradeoffs betweenbiodiversity conservation and two marketable rangeland ecosystem services: cattle grazing and elk hunting. The ecology is represented by an eleven species food web in which individual optimizing plants and animals engage in competitive and predator/prey relationships. The ecological model defines a steady-state set of sustainable grazing and hunting options, and for each option biodiversity is measured using an index defined over the eleven species. In linking the ecology to the economics, social welfare depends on grazing profits and hunter net benefits. The problem can be stated as maximizing economic welfare over two ecosystem services, subject to their sustainable use and subject to a target level of biodiversity. A numerical application with economic and biological data from the Western United States is used to determine sustainable grazing and hunting options for alternative biodiversity levels, and to select the option that maximizes welfare.
KW - Sustainability Science
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Threshold
KW - Multispecies
KW - Economic/ecological integration
KW - Rangelands
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878949923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.013
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 93
SP - 116
EP - 127
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
SN - 0921-8009
ER -