DRGs and the Professional Independence of Physicians

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearch

Standard

DRGs and the Professional Independence of Physicians. / Frisina, Lorraine; Cacace, Mirella.
Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare. ed. / Ashish N. Dwivedi . Vol. 1 Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference, 2009. p. 173-191.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearch

Harvard

Frisina, L & Cacace, M 2009, DRGs and the Professional Independence of Physicians. in AN Dwivedi (ed.), Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare. vol. 1, Medical Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA, pp. 173-191. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-356-2.ch012

APA

Frisina, L., & Cacace, M. (2009). DRGs and the Professional Independence of Physicians. In A. N. Dwivedi (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare (Vol. 1, pp. 173-191). Medical Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-356-2.ch012

Vancouver

Frisina L, Cacace M. DRGs and the Professional Independence of Physicians. In Dwivedi AN, editor, Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare. Vol. 1. Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference. 2009. p. 173-191 doi: 10.4018/978-1-60566-356-2.ch012

Bibtex

@inbook{a61a43df5d7a4c71ab773cbe9b552874,
title = "DRGs and the Professional Independence of Physicians",
abstract = "This chapter examines the effects of diagnosis related groups (DRGs) on the professional independence of physicians in three distinct types of healthcare systems: the U.S. private insurance system, where DRGs were first developed and subsequently implemented in the public Medicare program in 1983; the British National Health Service (NHS), which adopted an analogous version of DRGs referred to as Health Resource Groups (HRGs) in 1992; and the German social insurance system, which adopted its own DRG version (G-DRGs) based on a refined version of the Australian model that is to be fully phased into the hospital system by 2009. By examining these three cases, the present contribution asks (a) whether it is possible to identify any effects of DRGs on the professional independence of physicians; and (b) whether these effects are specific to the respective healthcare system and/or DRG version at hand.",
keywords = "Health sciences",
author = "Lorraine Frisina and Mirella Cacace",
note = "Chapter XII",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.4018/978-1-60566-356-2.ch012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781605663562",
volume = "1",
pages = "173--191",
editor = "{Dwivedi }, {Ashish N.}",
booktitle = "Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare",
publisher = "Medical Information Science Reference",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - DRGs and the Professional Independence of Physicians

AU - Frisina, Lorraine

AU - Cacace, Mirella

N1 - Chapter XII

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This chapter examines the effects of diagnosis related groups (DRGs) on the professional independence of physicians in three distinct types of healthcare systems: the U.S. private insurance system, where DRGs were first developed and subsequently implemented in the public Medicare program in 1983; the British National Health Service (NHS), which adopted an analogous version of DRGs referred to as Health Resource Groups (HRGs) in 1992; and the German social insurance system, which adopted its own DRG version (G-DRGs) based on a refined version of the Australian model that is to be fully phased into the hospital system by 2009. By examining these three cases, the present contribution asks (a) whether it is possible to identify any effects of DRGs on the professional independence of physicians; and (b) whether these effects are specific to the respective healthcare system and/or DRG version at hand.

AB - This chapter examines the effects of diagnosis related groups (DRGs) on the professional independence of physicians in three distinct types of healthcare systems: the U.S. private insurance system, where DRGs were first developed and subsequently implemented in the public Medicare program in 1983; the British National Health Service (NHS), which adopted an analogous version of DRGs referred to as Health Resource Groups (HRGs) in 1992; and the German social insurance system, which adopted its own DRG version (G-DRGs) based on a refined version of the Australian model that is to be fully phased into the hospital system by 2009. By examining these three cases, the present contribution asks (a) whether it is possible to identify any effects of DRGs on the professional independence of physicians; and (b) whether these effects are specific to the respective healthcare system and/or DRG version at hand.

KW - Health sciences

U2 - 10.4018/978-1-60566-356-2.ch012

DO - 10.4018/978-1-60566-356-2.ch012

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 9781605663562

VL - 1

SP - 173

EP - 191

BT - Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare

A2 - Dwivedi , Ashish N.

PB - Medical Information Science Reference

CY - Hershey, PA

ER -