Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance: The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance: The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive. / Newig, Jens; Schulz, Daniel; Jager, Nicolas Wilhelm.
In: Environmental Management, Vol. 58, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 998 - 1014.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b36d06ff805e42ad83985fd00ed7fe3d,
title = "Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance: The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive",
abstract = "This article attempts to shed new light on prevailing puzzles of spatial scales in multi-level, participatory governance as regards the democratic legitimacy andenvironmental effectiveness of governance systems. We focus on the governance re-scaling by the European Water Framework Directive, which introduced new governance scales (mandated river basin management) and demandsconsultation of citizens and encourages {\textquoteleft}active involvement{\textquoteright} of stakeholders. This allows to examine whether and how re-scaling through deliberate governance interventions impacts on democratic legitimacy and effective environmental policy delivery. To guide the enquiry, this article organizes existing—partly contradictory—claims on the relation of scale, democratic legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness into three clusters of mechanisms, integrating insights from multi-level governance, social-ecologicalsystems, and public participation. We empirically examine Water Framework Directive implementation in a comparative case study of multi-level systems in the light of the suggested mechanisms. We compare two planning areas inGermany: North Rhine Westphalia and Lower Saxony. Findings suggest that the Water Framework Directive did have some impact on institutionalizing hydrological scales and participation. Local participation appears generally bothmore effective and legitimate than on higher levels, pointing to the need for yet more tailored multi-level governance approaches, depending on whether environmental knowledge or advocacy is sought. We find mixed results regarding the potential of participation to bridge spatial {\textquoteleft}misfits{\textquoteright} between ecological and administrative scales of governance, depending on the historical institutionalization of governance on ecological scales. Polycentricity, finally, appeared somewhat favorable in effectiveness terms with some distinctdifferences regarding polycentricity in planning vs. polycentricity in implementation.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Multi-level governance, Re-scaling, Democratic dilemma , Polycentric governance, Sustainable water resources management, Mandated participatory planning",
author = "Jens Newig and Daniel Schulz and Jager, {Nicolas Wilhelm}",
note = "Funding Information: This work has been carried out within the project GoScaLE (Participatory Governance and the Impact of Scales on Democratic Legitimacy and Effectiveness) under grant no. 1207/3-1 of the German Research Foundation (DFG). GoScaLE was part of the collaborative project WaterScale (Water Governance and Problems of Scale. The Example of Institutionalizing River Basin Management through the EC-Water Framework Directive), www.waterscale.info . We thank Tim Moss, Frank H{\"u}esker, and Wiebke Grund for discussions and comments on the research presented here. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, The Author(s).",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-016-0753-8",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "998 -- 1014",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance

T2 - The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Schulz, Daniel

AU - Jager, Nicolas Wilhelm

N1 - Funding Information: This work has been carried out within the project GoScaLE (Participatory Governance and the Impact of Scales on Democratic Legitimacy and Effectiveness) under grant no. 1207/3-1 of the German Research Foundation (DFG). GoScaLE was part of the collaborative project WaterScale (Water Governance and Problems of Scale. The Example of Institutionalizing River Basin Management through the EC-Water Framework Directive), www.waterscale.info . We thank Tim Moss, Frank Hüesker, and Wiebke Grund for discussions and comments on the research presented here. Publisher Copyright: © 2016, The Author(s).

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - This article attempts to shed new light on prevailing puzzles of spatial scales in multi-level, participatory governance as regards the democratic legitimacy andenvironmental effectiveness of governance systems. We focus on the governance re-scaling by the European Water Framework Directive, which introduced new governance scales (mandated river basin management) and demandsconsultation of citizens and encourages ‘active involvement’ of stakeholders. This allows to examine whether and how re-scaling through deliberate governance interventions impacts on democratic legitimacy and effective environmental policy delivery. To guide the enquiry, this article organizes existing—partly contradictory—claims on the relation of scale, democratic legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness into three clusters of mechanisms, integrating insights from multi-level governance, social-ecologicalsystems, and public participation. We empirically examine Water Framework Directive implementation in a comparative case study of multi-level systems in the light of the suggested mechanisms. We compare two planning areas inGermany: North Rhine Westphalia and Lower Saxony. Findings suggest that the Water Framework Directive did have some impact on institutionalizing hydrological scales and participation. Local participation appears generally bothmore effective and legitimate than on higher levels, pointing to the need for yet more tailored multi-level governance approaches, depending on whether environmental knowledge or advocacy is sought. We find mixed results regarding the potential of participation to bridge spatial ‘misfits’ between ecological and administrative scales of governance, depending on the historical institutionalization of governance on ecological scales. Polycentricity, finally, appeared somewhat favorable in effectiveness terms with some distinctdifferences regarding polycentricity in planning vs. polycentricity in implementation.

AB - This article attempts to shed new light on prevailing puzzles of spatial scales in multi-level, participatory governance as regards the democratic legitimacy andenvironmental effectiveness of governance systems. We focus on the governance re-scaling by the European Water Framework Directive, which introduced new governance scales (mandated river basin management) and demandsconsultation of citizens and encourages ‘active involvement’ of stakeholders. This allows to examine whether and how re-scaling through deliberate governance interventions impacts on democratic legitimacy and effective environmental policy delivery. To guide the enquiry, this article organizes existing—partly contradictory—claims on the relation of scale, democratic legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness into three clusters of mechanisms, integrating insights from multi-level governance, social-ecologicalsystems, and public participation. We empirically examine Water Framework Directive implementation in a comparative case study of multi-level systems in the light of the suggested mechanisms. We compare two planning areas inGermany: North Rhine Westphalia and Lower Saxony. Findings suggest that the Water Framework Directive did have some impact on institutionalizing hydrological scales and participation. Local participation appears generally bothmore effective and legitimate than on higher levels, pointing to the need for yet more tailored multi-level governance approaches, depending on whether environmental knowledge or advocacy is sought. We find mixed results regarding the potential of participation to bridge spatial ‘misfits’ between ecological and administrative scales of governance, depending on the historical institutionalization of governance on ecological scales. Polycentricity, finally, appeared somewhat favorable in effectiveness terms with some distinctdifferences regarding polycentricity in planning vs. polycentricity in implementation.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Multi-level governance

KW - Re-scaling

KW - Democratic dilemma

KW - Polycentric governance

KW - Sustainable water resources management

KW - Mandated participatory planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988603361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-016-0753-8

DO - 10.1007/s00267-016-0753-8

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 27650440

VL - 58

SP - 998

EP - 1014

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 6

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Mainstream parties and global warming
  2. Communication management of start-ups: an empirical analysis of entrepreneurs’ communication and networking success on Facebook
  3. Responder Feelings in a Three-Player Three-Option Ultimatum Game
  4. Demand response aggregators as institutional entrepreneurs in the European electricity market
  5. Twin-roll casting after intensive melt shearing and subsequent rolling of an am30 magnesium alloy with addition of cao and sic
  6. Keine große Nummer
  7. Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Mental Health Problems
  8. Introduction: Interiors and interiority
  9. Artificial animals
  10. SHEstainability
  11. Connecting feedback to self-efficacy
  12. Knowledge-networking capability in German SMEs
  13. Themenheft: Zu Ehren von Irene Neverla
  14. Intendierte Lerneffekte: Formative Evaluation inter- und transdisziplinärer Forschung
  15. The Creativity Complex
  16. Cabinets and Decision-Making Processes
  17. Die deutsche Selbstbeurteilungsversion des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu-S)
  18. Evidence-Based Management and Organisational Reality
  19. Playing the past to understand the present
  20. Der Auftrag
  21. Longitudinal and Latitudinal Distribution of Perfluoroalkyl Compounds in the Surface Water of the Atlantic Ocean
  22. Reputation und Reiseentscheidung im Internet
  23. Paradigmawechsel
  24. Digitisation and Sovereignty in Humanitarian Space
  25. NGOs
  26. Einführung in die Ästhetische Bildung
  27. Geheimnistheater
  28. Measuring the Impacts of NGO Partnerships
  29. Beyond Tolerance
  30. The Americas: Evo's Bolivia: Continuity and Change, C. Farthing Linda & H. Kohl Benjamin . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2014. 272pp
  31. Adrienne Windhoff-Heritier: Policy Analyse : eine Einführung