Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance: The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance: The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive. / Newig, Jens; Schulz, Daniel; Jager, Nicolas Wilhelm.
In: Environmental Management, Vol. 58, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 998 - 1014.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b36d06ff805e42ad83985fd00ed7fe3d,
title = "Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance: The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive",
abstract = "This article attempts to shed new light on prevailing puzzles of spatial scales in multi-level, participatory governance as regards the democratic legitimacy andenvironmental effectiveness of governance systems. We focus on the governance re-scaling by the European Water Framework Directive, which introduced new governance scales (mandated river basin management) and demandsconsultation of citizens and encourages {\textquoteleft}active involvement{\textquoteright} of stakeholders. This allows to examine whether and how re-scaling through deliberate governance interventions impacts on democratic legitimacy and effective environmental policy delivery. To guide the enquiry, this article organizes existing—partly contradictory—claims on the relation of scale, democratic legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness into three clusters of mechanisms, integrating insights from multi-level governance, social-ecologicalsystems, and public participation. We empirically examine Water Framework Directive implementation in a comparative case study of multi-level systems in the light of the suggested mechanisms. We compare two planning areas inGermany: North Rhine Westphalia and Lower Saxony. Findings suggest that the Water Framework Directive did have some impact on institutionalizing hydrological scales and participation. Local participation appears generally bothmore effective and legitimate than on higher levels, pointing to the need for yet more tailored multi-level governance approaches, depending on whether environmental knowledge or advocacy is sought. We find mixed results regarding the potential of participation to bridge spatial {\textquoteleft}misfits{\textquoteright} between ecological and administrative scales of governance, depending on the historical institutionalization of governance on ecological scales. Polycentricity, finally, appeared somewhat favorable in effectiveness terms with some distinctdifferences regarding polycentricity in planning vs. polycentricity in implementation.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Multi-level governance, Re-scaling, Democratic dilemma , Polycentric governance, Sustainable water resources management, Mandated participatory planning",
author = "Jens Newig and Daniel Schulz and Jager, {Nicolas Wilhelm}",
note = "Funding Information: This work has been carried out within the project GoScaLE (Participatory Governance and the Impact of Scales on Democratic Legitimacy and Effectiveness) under grant no. 1207/3-1 of the German Research Foundation (DFG). GoScaLE was part of the collaborative project WaterScale (Water Governance and Problems of Scale. The Example of Institutionalizing River Basin Management through the EC-Water Framework Directive), www.waterscale.info . We thank Tim Moss, Frank H{\"u}esker, and Wiebke Grund for discussions and comments on the research presented here. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, The Author(s).",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-016-0753-8",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "998 -- 1014",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance

T2 - The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Schulz, Daniel

AU - Jager, Nicolas Wilhelm

N1 - Funding Information: This work has been carried out within the project GoScaLE (Participatory Governance and the Impact of Scales on Democratic Legitimacy and Effectiveness) under grant no. 1207/3-1 of the German Research Foundation (DFG). GoScaLE was part of the collaborative project WaterScale (Water Governance and Problems of Scale. The Example of Institutionalizing River Basin Management through the EC-Water Framework Directive), www.waterscale.info . We thank Tim Moss, Frank Hüesker, and Wiebke Grund for discussions and comments on the research presented here. Publisher Copyright: © 2016, The Author(s).

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - This article attempts to shed new light on prevailing puzzles of spatial scales in multi-level, participatory governance as regards the democratic legitimacy andenvironmental effectiveness of governance systems. We focus on the governance re-scaling by the European Water Framework Directive, which introduced new governance scales (mandated river basin management) and demandsconsultation of citizens and encourages ‘active involvement’ of stakeholders. This allows to examine whether and how re-scaling through deliberate governance interventions impacts on democratic legitimacy and effective environmental policy delivery. To guide the enquiry, this article organizes existing—partly contradictory—claims on the relation of scale, democratic legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness into three clusters of mechanisms, integrating insights from multi-level governance, social-ecologicalsystems, and public participation. We empirically examine Water Framework Directive implementation in a comparative case study of multi-level systems in the light of the suggested mechanisms. We compare two planning areas inGermany: North Rhine Westphalia and Lower Saxony. Findings suggest that the Water Framework Directive did have some impact on institutionalizing hydrological scales and participation. Local participation appears generally bothmore effective and legitimate than on higher levels, pointing to the need for yet more tailored multi-level governance approaches, depending on whether environmental knowledge or advocacy is sought. We find mixed results regarding the potential of participation to bridge spatial ‘misfits’ between ecological and administrative scales of governance, depending on the historical institutionalization of governance on ecological scales. Polycentricity, finally, appeared somewhat favorable in effectiveness terms with some distinctdifferences regarding polycentricity in planning vs. polycentricity in implementation.

AB - This article attempts to shed new light on prevailing puzzles of spatial scales in multi-level, participatory governance as regards the democratic legitimacy andenvironmental effectiveness of governance systems. We focus on the governance re-scaling by the European Water Framework Directive, which introduced new governance scales (mandated river basin management) and demandsconsultation of citizens and encourages ‘active involvement’ of stakeholders. This allows to examine whether and how re-scaling through deliberate governance interventions impacts on democratic legitimacy and effective environmental policy delivery. To guide the enquiry, this article organizes existing—partly contradictory—claims on the relation of scale, democratic legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness into three clusters of mechanisms, integrating insights from multi-level governance, social-ecologicalsystems, and public participation. We empirically examine Water Framework Directive implementation in a comparative case study of multi-level systems in the light of the suggested mechanisms. We compare two planning areas inGermany: North Rhine Westphalia and Lower Saxony. Findings suggest that the Water Framework Directive did have some impact on institutionalizing hydrological scales and participation. Local participation appears generally bothmore effective and legitimate than on higher levels, pointing to the need for yet more tailored multi-level governance approaches, depending on whether environmental knowledge or advocacy is sought. We find mixed results regarding the potential of participation to bridge spatial ‘misfits’ between ecological and administrative scales of governance, depending on the historical institutionalization of governance on ecological scales. Polycentricity, finally, appeared somewhat favorable in effectiveness terms with some distinctdifferences regarding polycentricity in planning vs. polycentricity in implementation.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Multi-level governance

KW - Re-scaling

KW - Democratic dilemma

KW - Polycentric governance

KW - Sustainable water resources management

KW - Mandated participatory planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988603361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-016-0753-8

DO - 10.1007/s00267-016-0753-8

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 27650440

VL - 58

SP - 998

EP - 1014

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 6

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Foreign and Domestic Takeovers in Germany: Cherry-picking and Lemon-grabbing
  2. Mathematics teachers’ domain-specific professional knowledge: conceptualization and test construction in COACTIV
  3. Nitrogen losses from fertilizers applied to maize, wheat and rice in the North China Plain
  4. Patterns and hotspots of carabid beetle diversity in the Palaearctic – insights from a hyperdiverse invertebrate taxon
  5. A sticky affair
  6. Friction analyses in twisted and helical profile extrusion of aluminum alloys
  7. Die Rentenreform in der Diskussion
  8. A Lyapunov-based Adaptive Control Law for an Electromagnetic Actuator
  9. The Challenge of Long-Term Climate Change
  10. Course Evaluations
  11. Do red herrings swim in circles?
  12. In situ studies of light metals with synchrotron radiation and neutrons
  13. Multiple import sourcing
  14. Exports and Firm Characteristics in Germany: A Survey of Empirical Studies (1991 to 2011)
  15. The reputation costs of executive misconduct accusations
  16. Relative inequality and poverty in Germany and the United States using alternative equivalence scales
  17. Export entry, export exit and productivity in German manufacturing industries
  18. Fourier methods for quasi-periodic oscillations
  19. Dating the Neanderthal environment
  20. Gewalt
  21. Ecophysiological isotope tools for characterising the drought sensitivity of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb. Franco)
  22. Simulationsbasierte Optimierung der Reihenfolgeplanung am Beispiel eines Liniensorters in der Automobilindustrie
  23. Species diversity of forest floor biota in non-native Douglas-fir stands is similar to that of native stands
  24. Öffentlichkeiten
  25. Gaseous nitrogen losses from urea applied to maize on a calcareous fluvo-aquic soil in the North China Plain
  26. Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and creep behavior of Mg-Sn-Ca alloys
  27. Palaeodose underestimation of heated quartz in red-TL dating of volcanic contexts
  28. What is green worth to you? Activating environmental values lowers price sensitivity towards electric vehicles
  29. Parketto
  30. Der Kompass "Nachhaltiger Konsum"
  31. In situ tensile texture analysis of a new Mg-RE alloy
  32. Verteilungseffekte von Kapazitätsmechanismen
  33. Optimal maintenance in the supply chain
  34. BRANGE EFFECTS IN HEDONIC EVALUATION OF OLFACTORY STIMULI
  35. Coherence in mathematics teacher education
  36. Case Study