Diffusion and Decentralized Bargaining in International Organizations: Evidence from Mercosur’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Diffusion and Decentralized Bargaining in International Organizations: Evidence from Mercosur’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism. / Lenz, Tobias.

In: International Studies Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.12.2021, p. 1859–1883.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{342b427213874b8581e88cc222bb9004,
title = "Diffusion and Decentralized Bargaining in International Organizations: Evidence from Mercosur{\textquoteright}s Dispute Settlement Mechanism",
abstract = "How and with what effects do institutions diffuse between international organizations (IOs)? An emerging literature extends a key insight of the study of diffusion processes among states to the international level, establishing that the adoption of institutions in IOs is regularly conditioned by the choices of other IOs. Yet, this literature neglects a key contextual difference between the two settings: unlike in the hierarchically structured organizations that have dominated the literature on diffusion, institutional creation, and change in IOs are the result of decentralized bargaining among sovereign governments. This paper develops a heuristic model that shows how diffusion between IOs shapes decision-making within them through its impact on the institutional preferences of individual governments. The model establishes that, unlike in diffusion processes among states, convergence is an unlikely outcome of diffusion between IOs. By implication, studies that take institutional convergence as their starting point are likely to underestimate the pervasiveness of diffusion effects. I demonstrate these arguments with a case study of the establishment of a regional dispute settlement system in Mercosur, a regional organization in Latin America.",
keywords = "Politics, diffusion, bargaining, international organization, institutional design, dispute settlement, mercosur",
author = "Tobias Lenz",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/isr/viab051",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1859–1883",
journal = "International Studies Review",
issn = "1521-9488",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diffusion and Decentralized Bargaining in International Organizations: Evidence from Mercosur’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism

AU - Lenz, Tobias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.

PY - 2021/12/1

Y1 - 2021/12/1

N2 - How and with what effects do institutions diffuse between international organizations (IOs)? An emerging literature extends a key insight of the study of diffusion processes among states to the international level, establishing that the adoption of institutions in IOs is regularly conditioned by the choices of other IOs. Yet, this literature neglects a key contextual difference between the two settings: unlike in the hierarchically structured organizations that have dominated the literature on diffusion, institutional creation, and change in IOs are the result of decentralized bargaining among sovereign governments. This paper develops a heuristic model that shows how diffusion between IOs shapes decision-making within them through its impact on the institutional preferences of individual governments. The model establishes that, unlike in diffusion processes among states, convergence is an unlikely outcome of diffusion between IOs. By implication, studies that take institutional convergence as their starting point are likely to underestimate the pervasiveness of diffusion effects. I demonstrate these arguments with a case study of the establishment of a regional dispute settlement system in Mercosur, a regional organization in Latin America.

AB - How and with what effects do institutions diffuse between international organizations (IOs)? An emerging literature extends a key insight of the study of diffusion processes among states to the international level, establishing that the adoption of institutions in IOs is regularly conditioned by the choices of other IOs. Yet, this literature neglects a key contextual difference between the two settings: unlike in the hierarchically structured organizations that have dominated the literature on diffusion, institutional creation, and change in IOs are the result of decentralized bargaining among sovereign governments. This paper develops a heuristic model that shows how diffusion between IOs shapes decision-making within them through its impact on the institutional preferences of individual governments. The model establishes that, unlike in diffusion processes among states, convergence is an unlikely outcome of diffusion between IOs. By implication, studies that take institutional convergence as their starting point are likely to underestimate the pervasiveness of diffusion effects. I demonstrate these arguments with a case study of the establishment of a regional dispute settlement system in Mercosur, a regional organization in Latin America.

KW - Politics

KW - diffusion

KW - bargaining

KW - international organization

KW - institutional design

KW - dispute settlement

KW - mercosur

UR - https://academic.oup.com/isr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/isr/viab051/6420643?searchresult=1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143863896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8d6e509c-aba4-3791-90ae-ee8f6e04b9bd/

U2 - 10.1093/isr/viab051

DO - 10.1093/isr/viab051

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 23

SP - 1859

EP - 1883

JO - International Studies Review

JF - International Studies Review

SN - 1521-9488

IS - 4

ER -

DOI