Diffusion and Decentralized Bargaining in International Organizations: Evidence from Mercosur’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: International Studies Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.12.2021, p. 1859–1883.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Diffusion and Decentralized Bargaining in International Organizations: Evidence from Mercosur’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism
AU - Lenz, Tobias
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - How and with what effects do institutions diffuse between international organizations (IOs)? An emerging literature extends a key insight of the study of diffusion processes among states to the international level, establishing that the adoption of institutions in IOs is regularly conditioned by the choices of other IOs. Yet, this literature neglects a key contextual difference between the two settings: unlike in the hierarchically structured organizations that have dominated the literature on diffusion, institutional creation, and change in IOs are the result of decentralized bargaining among sovereign governments. This paper develops a heuristic model that shows how diffusion between IOs shapes decision-making within them through its impact on the institutional preferences of individual governments. The model establishes that, unlike in diffusion processes among states, convergence is an unlikely outcome of diffusion between IOs. By implication, studies that take institutional convergence as their starting point are likely to underestimate the pervasiveness of diffusion effects. I demonstrate these arguments with a case study of the establishment of a regional dispute settlement system in Mercosur, a regional organization in Latin America.
AB - How and with what effects do institutions diffuse between international organizations (IOs)? An emerging literature extends a key insight of the study of diffusion processes among states to the international level, establishing that the adoption of institutions in IOs is regularly conditioned by the choices of other IOs. Yet, this literature neglects a key contextual difference between the two settings: unlike in the hierarchically structured organizations that have dominated the literature on diffusion, institutional creation, and change in IOs are the result of decentralized bargaining among sovereign governments. This paper develops a heuristic model that shows how diffusion between IOs shapes decision-making within them through its impact on the institutional preferences of individual governments. The model establishes that, unlike in diffusion processes among states, convergence is an unlikely outcome of diffusion between IOs. By implication, studies that take institutional convergence as their starting point are likely to underestimate the pervasiveness of diffusion effects. I demonstrate these arguments with a case study of the establishment of a regional dispute settlement system in Mercosur, a regional organization in Latin America.
KW - Politics
KW - diffusion
KW - bargaining
KW - international organization
KW - institutional design
KW - dispute settlement
KW - mercosur
UR - https://academic.oup.com/isr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/isr/viab051/6420643?searchresult=1
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143863896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8d6e509c-aba4-3791-90ae-ee8f6e04b9bd/
U2 - 10.1093/isr/viab051
DO - 10.1093/isr/viab051
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 23
SP - 1859
EP - 1883
JO - International Studies Review
JF - International Studies Review
SN - 1521-9488
IS - 4
ER -