Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes: A variable-based analytical scheme

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes: A variable-based analytical scheme. / Newig, Jens; Adzersen, Ana; Challies, Edward et al.
Lüneburg: Institut für Umweltkommunikation der Universität Lüneburg, 2013. (INFU Discussion Paper; No. 37).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

Newig, J, Adzersen, A, Challies, E, Fritsch, O & Jager, NW 2013 'Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes: A variable-based analytical scheme' INFU Discussion Paper, no. 37, Institut für Umweltkommunikation der Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg.

APA

Newig, J., Adzersen, A., Challies, E., Fritsch, O., & Jager, N. W. (2013). Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes: A variable-based analytical scheme. (INFU Discussion Paper; No. 37). Institut für Umweltkommunikation der Universität Lüneburg.

Vancouver

Newig J, Adzersen A, Challies E, Fritsch O, Jager NW. Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes: A variable-based analytical scheme. Lüneburg: Institut für Umweltkommunikation der Universität Lüneburg. 2013 Feb 20. (INFU Discussion Paper; 37).

Bibtex

@techreport{3319837f94ca4bd0b5728c147693f00b,
title = "Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes: A variable-based analytical scheme",
abstract = "In this discussion paper, we introduce and outline in detail an analytical scheme - SCAPE - that has been developed over several years, that has been tested and iteratively refined through application to dozens of case studies, and which is currently in use for a case survey of several hundred case studies of public environmental decision-making. The {\textquoteleft}scheme for the comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making{\textquoteright} (SCAPE) facilitates the systematic comparison of cases of public decision-making and serves to identify causal relationships between the characteristics of a decision-making process and its outcomes. The framework is meant to be applicable to a wide range of public decision-making processes, focused on but not limited to environmental governance processes SCAPE is particularly suited to the analysis of processes in the realm of environmental governance that entail different forms of citizen and interest group involvement or environmental mediation. It develops a clear notion of the {\textquoteleft}decision-making process{\textquoteright} as its core unit of analysis, and provides a coherently structured set of more than 300 items covering: contextual conditions (section B) such as the societal and political environment, the pre-history of a decision-making process, elements of the issue at stake, characteristics of the relevant stakeholder field, and the level of pre-existing conflict; process characteristics (section C) such as who is involved in terms of governmental and non-governmental actors, the configuration of power relations, the role of scientific expertise, communication and information flows between actors, aspects of process facilitation, and process resources; process outputs and outcomes (section D) in terms of social, economic and environmental aspects (with an emphasis on the latter), social learning, trust-building, public acceptance, and conflict resolution, to name but a few",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, participatory governance, case survey, environmental governance, scheme for the comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making (SCAPE), conceptual framework, stakeholder mapping, causal hypotheses, code book, multi-case comparative studies, meta analysis",
author = "Jens Newig and Ana Adzersen and Edward Challies and Oliver Fritsch and Jager, {Nicolas Wilhelm}",
year = "2013",
month = feb,
day = "20",
language = "English",
series = "INFU Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Institut f{\"u}r Umweltkommunikation der Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",
number = "37",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Institut f{\"u}r Umweltkommunikation der Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes

T2 - A variable-based analytical scheme

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Adzersen, Ana

AU - Challies, Edward

AU - Fritsch, Oliver

AU - Jager, Nicolas Wilhelm

PY - 2013/2/20

Y1 - 2013/2/20

N2 - In this discussion paper, we introduce and outline in detail an analytical scheme - SCAPE - that has been developed over several years, that has been tested and iteratively refined through application to dozens of case studies, and which is currently in use for a case survey of several hundred case studies of public environmental decision-making. The ‘scheme for the comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making’ (SCAPE) facilitates the systematic comparison of cases of public decision-making and serves to identify causal relationships between the characteristics of a decision-making process and its outcomes. The framework is meant to be applicable to a wide range of public decision-making processes, focused on but not limited to environmental governance processes SCAPE is particularly suited to the analysis of processes in the realm of environmental governance that entail different forms of citizen and interest group involvement or environmental mediation. It develops a clear notion of the ‘decision-making process’ as its core unit of analysis, and provides a coherently structured set of more than 300 items covering: contextual conditions (section B) such as the societal and political environment, the pre-history of a decision-making process, elements of the issue at stake, characteristics of the relevant stakeholder field, and the level of pre-existing conflict; process characteristics (section C) such as who is involved in terms of governmental and non-governmental actors, the configuration of power relations, the role of scientific expertise, communication and information flows between actors, aspects of process facilitation, and process resources; process outputs and outcomes (section D) in terms of social, economic and environmental aspects (with an emphasis on the latter), social learning, trust-building, public acceptance, and conflict resolution, to name but a few

AB - In this discussion paper, we introduce and outline in detail an analytical scheme - SCAPE - that has been developed over several years, that has been tested and iteratively refined through application to dozens of case studies, and which is currently in use for a case survey of several hundred case studies of public environmental decision-making. The ‘scheme for the comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making’ (SCAPE) facilitates the systematic comparison of cases of public decision-making and serves to identify causal relationships between the characteristics of a decision-making process and its outcomes. The framework is meant to be applicable to a wide range of public decision-making processes, focused on but not limited to environmental governance processes SCAPE is particularly suited to the analysis of processes in the realm of environmental governance that entail different forms of citizen and interest group involvement or environmental mediation. It develops a clear notion of the ‘decision-making process’ as its core unit of analysis, and provides a coherently structured set of more than 300 items covering: contextual conditions (section B) such as the societal and political environment, the pre-history of a decision-making process, elements of the issue at stake, characteristics of the relevant stakeholder field, and the level of pre-existing conflict; process characteristics (section C) such as who is involved in terms of governmental and non-governmental actors, the configuration of power relations, the role of scientific expertise, communication and information flows between actors, aspects of process facilitation, and process resources; process outputs and outcomes (section D) in terms of social, economic and environmental aspects (with an emphasis on the latter), social learning, trust-building, public acceptance, and conflict resolution, to name but a few

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - participatory governance

KW - case survey

KW - environmental governance

KW - scheme for the comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making (SCAPE)

KW - conceptual framework

KW - stakeholder mapping

KW - causal hypotheses

KW - code book

KW - multi-case comparative studies

KW - meta analysis

M3 - Working papers

T3 - INFU Discussion Paper

BT - Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes

PB - Institut für Umweltkommunikation der Universität Lüneburg

CY - Lüneburg

ER -

Documents